Life as a Source of Theory: Erik Erikson’s Contributions, Boundaries, and Marginalities

Chapter

Abstract

Psychobiography and the study of lives – an area of specialized study in the discipline of psychology – asserts that it is often clarifying and sometimes essential to analyze the life histories of intellectual leaders whose ideas have shaped social and cultural life. Psychobiographies can help us understand the personal and historical contexts of theory construction, dissemination, and reception, while providing interpretive clues to the complex process of theory development and institutionalization (Anderson 2005). In fact, William Runyan (2006) has argued that studying how the lives of scientists have influenced their scientific projects can help steer observers away from misleading causal abstractions. Uncovering the connections between lives and theories has great heuristic value. The study of lives can advance the study of ideas.

Erik Erikson understood these possibilities and spent much of his long, productive life writing about the lives of historical figures who fascinated him: Hitler, Gorky, Jefferson, Luther, Gandhi, and of course, Sigmund Freud. Erikson saw the study of lives as critical to understanding historical events (e.g., The rise of Nazi Germany, the Protestant Reformation, India’s Independence Movement) and he believed that persons influencing important social changes were leaders precisely because they were “working out” personal conflicts that were psychosocial in origin. In brief, these leaders were able to navigate personal, developmental transitions in ways that were relevant to their sociohistorical contexts, and they were able to engage and powerfully influence the public and political conflicts of their times – for good and ill. In advancing and developing such ideas, Erikson reformulated and sometimes implicitly repudiated the central ideas of his professional mentors, Sigmund and Anna Freud. While considering himself personally and professionally “loyal” to the founders of psychoanalysis, he nonetheless tried to expand the focus of psychoanalysis from its “vertical,” geological drilling for the riches of intrapsychic toward an additional exploration of those dense surfaces of interpersonal, historical, and social geographies that contextualize human development.

Keywords

Europe American Identity Drilling Assure Assimilation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The biographical “facts” discussed in this chapter are drawn from what the New York Times (Lomas 1970) described as the seminal and “spiritual biography” written by Robert Coles (1970); the authorized, exhaustive, and historical biography written by Lawrence Friedman (1999); and the important British biographical perspectives provided by Kit Welchman (2000). As I never had the privilege of personally knowing Erikson, I have relied for the most part on the texts described above, which include Erikson’s autobiographical writings as well as those by others cited in the chapter. I am also very grateful for my conversations with Robert Coles and Lawrence Friedman who shared personal memories and impressions of this complex man whom they came to know so well at very different points in Erikson’s life cycle. In addition, William Borden, Wiliam MacKinley Runyan, Robert Walker, and Thomas Miller provided generative suggestions and criticisms. Finally, because each life is ultimately a mystery, I hope that the reader will see my claims as grounded in reasonable inferences as opposed to definitive conclusions.

I am deeply indebted to Robert Coles for directing my attention to childhood society's closing insights regarding "judicious indignation" by purposefully quoting it from memory to me on many occasions, finally clarifying for this occasionally obtuse listener that this text reflects Erik and Joan Erikson’s moral core.

Evidence for Erikson’s affinity for Paul Tillich’s perspectives can be found in the essay written for Tillich’s memorial service in 1966. (See Erikson 1987.)

References

  1. Alexander, I. (2005). Erikson & psychobiography, psychobiography & Erikson. In W. T. Schultz (Ed.), Handbook of psychobiography (pp. 265–284). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. W. (2005). The psychobiographical study of psychologists. In W. T. Schultz (Ed.), Handbook of psychobiography (pp. 203–209). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Auden, W. H. (1940/1979). In memory of Sigmund Freud. In E. Mendelson (Ed.), W. H. Auden: Selected Poems, New Edition (pp. 91–95). New York: VintageGoogle Scholar
  4. Bein, A. (1990). The Jewish question: Biography of a world problem. New York: Herzl.Google Scholar
  5. Berman, M. (1975, March 30). Review of Life History and the Historical Moment. New York Times Book Review, pp. 1–2Google Scholar
  6. Betancourt, T. S., Borisova, I., Rubin-Smith, J., Gingerich, T., Williams, T., & Agnew-Blais, J. (2008). Psychosocial adjustment and social reintegration of children associated with armed forces and armed groups: The state of the field and future directions. Austin, TX: Psychology Beyond Borders.Google Scholar
  7. Bloland, S. E. (2005). In the shadows of fame: A memoir by the daughter of Erik Erikson. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  8. Borden, W. (2009). Contemporary psychodynamic theory & practice. Chicago: Lyceum.Google Scholar
  9. Brett, R., & Specht, I. (2004). Young soldiers: Why they choose to fight. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  10. Coles, R. (1970). Erik Erikson: The growth of his work. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  11. Coles, R. (1987a). Dorothy day: A radical devotion. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  12. Coles, R. (1987b). Simone Weil: A Modern Pilgrimage. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  13. Coles, R. (1998). Psychoanalysis: The American Experience. In M.S. Roth (Ed.) Freud: Conflict and Culture. Newyork: Knopf.Google Scholar
  14. Coles, R. (2000a). Psychoanalysis: The American experience. In M. Roth (Ed.), Freud: Conflict and culture (pp. 140–151). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  15. Coles, R. (2000b). The Erik Erikson reader. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Coles, R. (2003) Childern of Crisis: Selections from the Pulitzer Prize-Winning five volume, Children of Crisis Series. Boston: Back Bay.Google Scholar
  17. Coles, R. (2004). Remembering Erik. In K. Hoover (Ed.), The future of identity: Centennial reflections on the legacy of Erik Erikson (pp. 17–23). Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  18. St De Aubin, E., McAdams, D. P., & Kim, T.-C. (2004). The generative society: Caring for future generations. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edmunson, M. (2007). The death of Sigmund Freud: The legacy of his last days. New York: Bloomsbury USA.Google Scholar
  20. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Erikson, E. H. (1956). The first psychoanalyst. Yale review, 46, 40–62.Google Scholar
  22. Erikson, E. H. (1958). Young man Luther. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Erikson, E. H. (1964). Insight & responsibility. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Erikson, E. H. (1969). Gandhi’s truth: On the origins of militant nonviolence. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Erikson, E. H. (1972). Autobiographical notes on the identity crisis. In G. Holton (Ed.), The twentieth century sciences: Studies in the biography of ideas (pp. 3–32). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Erikson, E. H. (1975). Life history and the historical moment. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Erikson, E. H. (1976). Reflections on Dr. Borg’s life cycle. Daedalus, 105, 1–31.Google Scholar
  29. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Themes of adulthood in the Freud-Jung correspondence. In N. J. Smelser, ed., Themes of work and love in adulthood (43-74). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Erikson, E. H. (1981). The Galiliean sayings and the sense of “I.” Yale Review 9(8). (Reprinted (1998) In R. Wallerstein, & L. Godlberger (Eds.), Ideas and identities: The life and work of Erik Erikson (pp. 277–322). Madison, CT: International Universities PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Erikson, E. H. (1987). Words for Paul Tillich (1966). In S. Schlein (Ed.), A way of looking at things (pp. 726–728). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Erikson, K. T. (1994). A new species of trouble: The human experience of modern disasters. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  33. Erikson, K. T. (2004). Reflections on generativity and society: A sociologist’s perspective. In St E. de Aubin, et al. (Eds.), The generative society: Caring for future generations (pp. 51–62). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Evans, R. (1967). Dialogue with Erik Erikson. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  35. Fowler, J. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  36. Fowler, J. (1984). Becoming adult, becoming Christian: Adult development and Christian faith. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  37. Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents (J. Strachey, Trans., 1974 ed., vol. 21). London: HogarthGoogle Scholar
  38. Friedman, L. J. (1999). Identity’s architect: A biography of Erik Erikson. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  39. Friedman, L. J. (2004a). Erik Erikson on generativity: A biographer’s perspective. In E. de St Aubin, et al. (Eds.), The Generative society: Caring for future generations (pp. 257–264). Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Friedman, L. J. (2004b). Erik Erikson: A biographer’s reflections. In K. Hoover (Ed.), The future of identity: Centennial reflections on the legacy of Erik Erikson (pp. 17–23). Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  41. Gardner, H. (1993a). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  42. Gardner, H. (1993b). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  43. Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds: Portraits of exceptional individuals and an examination of our extraordinariness. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  44. Gardner, H. (1999). The enigma of Erik Erikson. The New York Review of Books, 46(11), 51–56.Google Scholar
  45. Gardner, H., & Laskin, E. (1995). Leading minds: An anatomy of leadership. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  46. Gill, M. M. (ed). (1967). The collected papers of David Rapaport. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  47. Gilligan, C. (2004). Recovering psyche: Reflections on life-history and history. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 32, 131–147.Google Scholar
  48. Hartmann, H. (1951). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. In D. Rapaport (Ed.), Organization and pathology of thought (pp. 362–396). New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Heilbut, A. (1983). Exiled in paradise: German refugee artists and intellectuals in America, from the 1930s to the Present. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  50. Heinze, A. R. (2004). Jews and the American soul: Human nature in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hoare, C. H. (2002). Erikson on development in adulthood: New Insights from the unpublished papers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kinnvall, C. (2004) Globalization, identity, and the search for chosen traumas. In K. Hoover (Ed.), The future of identity: centennial reflections on the legacy of Erik Erikson (pp. 111–136). Lanham MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  53. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (2008). A systematic look at an old problem. Nature, 451, 644–647.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Kotre, J. (1996). Outliving the self: How we live on in future generations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  55. Lachman, M. E. (2004). Development in midlife. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 305–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lifton, R. J. (1986). The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  57. Lifton, R., & Olson, E. (eds). (1974). Explorations in psychohistory: The Wellfleet papers. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  58. Lomas, P. (1970, November 22). Review of Erik Erikson: The growth of his work. New York Times Book Review. vol. 1, pp. 66–67Google Scholar
  59. Macha, G. (2001). The impact of war on children. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  60. Malcolm, J. (1983). The impossible profession. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  61. Marcia, J. (2004). Why Erikson? In K Hoover (Ed.), The future of identity: Centennial reflections on the legacy of Erik Erikson (pp 43–60) Lanham MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  62. Meissner, W. W. (2000). Freud & psychoanalysis. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  63. Monroe, K.R. (2004). Identity and choice. In K. Hoover (Ed.), The Future of identity: Centennial reflections on Erik Erikson (pp. 77–96). Lanham MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
  64. Muller, J. Z. (2008). Us and them. Foreign Affairs, 87(2), 18–35.Google Scholar
  65. Prince, R. M. (ed). (1999). The death of psychoanalysis: Murder? Suicide? Or rumor greatly exaggerated?. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  66. Rilke, R. M. (1963). Duino Elegies. (J. B. Leishman, & S. Spender, Trans.) New York: Norton (Original work published 1939)Google Scholar
  67. Roazen, P. (1976). Erik Erikson: The power and limits of a vision. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  68. Roazen, P. (2000) Political theory and the psychology of the unconscious. London: Open Gate Press.Google Scholar
  69. Runyan, W. M. (1982). Life histories and psychobiography. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Runyan, W. M. (ed). (1988). Psychology & historical interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Runyan, W.M. (2006). Psychobiography and the psychology of science: Understanding relations between the life and work of individual psychologists. Review of General Psychology, 90(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schlein, S. (ed). (1987). Erik Erikson: A way of looking at things: Selected papers. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  73. Schultz, W. T. (2005). Handbook of psychobiography. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  75. Shapiro, E., & Carr, A. W. (1993). Lost in familiar places: Creating new connections between the individual and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Shapiro, E., & Fromm, M. G. (2000). Eriksonian clinical theory and psychiatric treatment. In B. J. Sadock & V. S. Sadock (Eds.), Kaplan & Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry (7th ed., pp. 2200–2206). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  77. Smelser, N. J. (1998). The social edges of psychoanalysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  78. Sokel, W. H. (1959). The writer in extremis: Expressionism in twentieth century German literature. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Sulloway, F. (1979). Freud, biologist of the mind: Beyond the psychoanalytic legend. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  80. Tillich, P. (1966). On the boundary. New York: Collins.Google Scholar
  81. Vaillant, G. E., & Milofsky, E. (1980). Natural history of male psychological health: IX. Empirical evidence for Erikson’s model of the life cycle. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137(11), 1348–1359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Wakefield, J. C. (1997). Immortality and the externalization of the self: Plato’s unrecognized theory of generativity. In D. P. McAdams & St E. de Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  83. Wallerstein, R., & Goldberger, L. (eds). (1998). Ideas and identities: The life and work of Erik Erikson. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  84. Welchman, K. (2000). Erik Erikson: His life, work and significance. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Whitfield, S. J. (2002). Enigmas of modern Jewish identity. Jewish Social Studies: History, Culture & Society, 8(2–3), 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Kentucky, Center for the Study of Violence against ChildrenLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations