Skip to main content

Inner Terror and Outward Hate: The Effects of Mortality Salience on Bias Motivated Attacks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emotion and the Law

Part of the book series: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation ((NSM,volume 56))

Abstract

In 2008, a year that an African American man was elected President of the United States, and same sex unions were temporarily legalized in California and recognized in New York, reminders of intolerance and prejudice remained strong. Immediately following the election of Barack Obama, there was a surge in bias motivated attacks across the country, with derogating and intimidating remarks delivered by adults and even children as young as second-graders (Associated Press 2008). Further, shortly after the same sex unions were legalized in California, a majority of California voters supported “Proposition 8,” restricting the definition of marriage to that of a union between a man and a woman. In addition, during the previous year, nooses were displayed in various locations throughout the country such as on school grounds in Jena, Louisiana and on college campuses including the University of Maryland and Columbia University (Associated Press 2007). In addition, on February 12, 2008, in Oxnard California, an eighth-grader, 15-year old Lawrence King, was shot in the head and killed by a fellow student, 14-year old, Brandon McInerney. Apparently King, who often dressed in a feminine manner, had asked McInerney to be his valentine the day earlier (Newsweek 2008). These types of bias motivated attacks as well as others that have previously captured the nation’s attention reveal the darker side of humanity. Although basic cognitive processes that cause individuals to classify others as either ingroup or outgroup members are likely relevant in such attacks, basic categorization on its own may not be sufficient to unleash the anger that is sometimes apparent in hate crimes, such as that of the King murder. As a result, these crimes require additional psychological explanations to help us more clearly understand the underlying motivations that produce such behaviors. This chapter will explore a variety of social psychological theories that have been used to explain prejudicial attitudes and behavior that foster bias motivated crimes, with a particular focus on Terror Management Theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, New York has a fairly comprehensive hate crime law that states “1. A person commits a hate crime when he or she commits a specified offense and either: (a) intentionally selects the person against whom the offense is committed or intended to be committed in whole or in substantial part because of a belief or perception regarding the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation of a person, regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct, or (b) intentionally commits the act or acts constituting the offense in whole or in substantial part because of a belief or perception regarding the race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation of a person, regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct. 2. Proof of race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation of the defendant, the victim or of both the defendant and the victim does not, by itself, constitute legally sufficient evidence satisfying the people’s burden under paragraph (a) or (b) of subdivision one of this section.” (Retrieved from http://criminaljustice.state.ny.us/legalservices/ch107_hate_crimes_2000.htm December 17, 2008).

References

  • Allport GW (1954) The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Altschiller D (1999) Hate crimes. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Anti-Defamation League (2008) Retrieved on June 16, 2008 from http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/state_hate_crime_laws.pdf

  • Arndt J, Greenberg J (1999) The effects of a self-esteem boos and mortality salience on responses to boost relevant and irrelevant worldview threats. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25:1331–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt J, Lieberman JD, Cook A, Solomon S (2005) Terror in the courtroom: Exploring the effects of mortality salience on legal decision-making. Psychol, Public Policy Law 11:407–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press (2007) Retrieved on August 20, 2008 from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21228709/

  • Associated Press (2008) Retrieved on December 22, 2008 from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27738018/

  • Beck EM, Tolnay SE (1990) The killing fields of the Deep South: The market for cotton and the lynchings of Blacks, 1882–1930. Am Sociol Rev 55:526–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker E (1973) The denial of death. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R (1985) Social psychology: The second edition. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows EG, Wallace M (1999) Gotham: A history of New York City to 1898. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman BJ, Ridge RD, Das E, Key CW, Busath GL (2007) When god sanctions killing: Effect of scriptural violence on aggression. Psychol Sci 18:204–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byers B, Crider B, Biggers G (1999) Bias crime motivation. J Contem Justice 15:78–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne D (1971) The attraction paradigm. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Rights Act (1968) 18 United States Code, Section 245

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig KM, Waldo CR (1996) So, what’s a hate crime anyway?: Young adults’ perceptions of hate crimes, victims, and perpetrators. Law Hum Behav 20:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollard J, Doob LW, Miller NE, Mowrer OH, Sears RR (1939) Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt J (1992) The social psychology of prejudice. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian V, Mikulincer M (1997) Fear of death and the judgment of social transgressions: A multidimensional test of terror management theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 73:369–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin K (1998) Unassuming motivations: Contextualizing the narratives of antigay assailants. In: Herek GM (ed) Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner SL, Dovidio JF (2000) Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DP, Rich A (1998) White supremacist activity and crossburnings in North Carolina. J Quant Criminol 14:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DP, Glaser J, Rich A (1998) From lynching to gay bashing. The elusive connection between economic conditions and hate crime. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:82–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Rosenblatt A, Veeder M, Kirkland S, Lyon D (1990) Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. J Pers Soc Psychol 58:308–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J, Simon L, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Chatel D (1992a) Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:212–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J, Solomon S, Pyszczynski T, Rosenblatt A, Burling J, Lyon D, Pinel E, Simon L (1992b) Assessing the terror management analysis of self-esteem: Converging evidence of an anxiety-buffering function. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:913–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Pinel E, Simon L, Jordan K (1993) Effects of self-esteem on vulnerability-denying defensive distortions: Further evidence of an anxiety-buffering function of self-esteem. J Exp Soc Psychol 29:229–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J, Simon L, Porteus J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S (1995) Evidence of a terror management function of cultural icons: The effects of mortality salience on the inappropriate use of cherished cultural symbols. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 21:1221–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J, Solomon S, Pyszczynski T (1997) Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 61–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J, Schimel J, Martens A, Solomon S, Pyszcznyski T (2001) Sympathy for the devil: Evidence that reminding Whites of their mortality promotes more favorable reactions to White racists. Motiv Emot 25:113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine SJ, Harihara M, Niiya Y (2002) Terror management in Japan. Asian J Soc Psychol 5:169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepworth JT, West SG (1988) Lynchings and the economy: A time-series reanalysis of Hovland and Sears (1940). J Pers Soc Psychol 55:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg MA, Abrams D (1988) Social identifications. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland CI, Sears RR (1940) Minor studies of aggression: VI Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. J Psychol 9:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulse C (2008) http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/washington/07hate.html. Retrieved on 12/18/2008

  • Jacobs JB, Potter KP (1998) Hate crimes: Criminal law and identity politics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Janness V, Broad K (1997) Hate crimes: New social movements and the politics of violence. Aldine Transaction, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovera MB (2007) Implications of automatic and controlled processes in stereotyping for hate crime perpetration and litigation. In: Wiener RL, Bornstein BH, Schopp R, Willborn SL (eds) Social consciousness in legal decision making: Psychological perspectives. Springer Science, New York, pp 227–246

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger AB, Pischke J (1997) A statistical analysis of crime against foreigners in unified Germany. J Hum Resour 32:182–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin J (2007) The violence of hate: Confronting racism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of bigotry. Pearson Education, Inc., Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman JD, Arndt (2003) The effects of morality salience and reminders of historical oppression on reactions to hate crime offenders. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman JD, Arndt J, Personius J, Cook A (2001) Vicarious annihilation: The effect of mortality salience on perceptions of hate crimes. Law Hum Behav 25:547–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Local Law Enforcement Hate Crime Prevention Act (2007) HR 1592

    Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt J, Levin J, Bennett S (2002) Hate crime offenders: An expanded typology. J Soc Issues 58:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor H, Lieberman JD, Solomon S, Greenberg J, Arndt J, Simon L, Pyszczynski T (1998) Terror management and aggression: Evidence that mortality salience motivates aggression against worldview threatening others. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:590–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer M, Florian V (2000) Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience: Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms? J Pers Soc Psychol 79:260–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller NE (1941) The frustration-aggression hypothesis. Psychol Rev 48:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motyl M, Pyszczynski T, Cox C, Siedel A, Maxfield M (2009) One big family: The effects of mortality salience and a sense of common humanity on prejudice. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb T (1961) The acquaintance process. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek (2008) Retrieved on August 20, 2008 from http://www.newsweek.com/id/150468

  • Ochsmann R, Mathay M (1994) Depreciating and distancing from foreigners: Effects of mortality salience. Unpublished manuscript, Universitat Mainz, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Olzak S (1990) The political context of competition: Lynchings and urban racial violence, 1882–1914. Soc Forces 74:931–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott DJ, Peterson JL (2008) What motivates hate crimes based on sexual orientation? Mediating effects of anger on antigay aggression. Aggressive Behav 34:306–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Greenberg J (2003) In the wake of 9/II: The psychology of terror. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt A, Greenberg J, Solomon S, Pyszczynski T, Lyon D (1989) Evidence for terror management theory I: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:681–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild ZK, Abdollahi A, Pyszczynski T (2009) Does peace have a prayer? The effects of mortality salience, compassionate values, and religious fundamentalism on hostility towards out-groups. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimel J, Simon L, Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Waxmonsky J, Arndt J (1999) Stereotypes and terror management: Evidence that mortality salience enhances stereotypic thinking and preferences. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:905–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif M (1967) Group conflict and cooperation. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Streissguth T (2003) Hate crimes. Facts on File, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H (1981) Human groups and social categories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi JT, Norman NM (1985) A social psychological interpretation of displaced aggression. Adv Group Processes 2:29–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia v. Black (2003) 124S. Ct. 1536

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener RL, Richter E (2008) Symbolic hate: Intention to intimidate, political ideology, and group association. Law Hum Behav 32:463–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worchel S, Cooper J (1976) Understanding social psychology. Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel D. Lieberman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lieberman, J.D. (2009). Inner Terror and Outward Hate: The Effects of Mortality Salience on Bias Motivated Attacks. In: Bornstein, B., Wiener, R. (eds) Emotion and the Law. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol 56. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0696-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics