Skip to main content

An Archaeological View of Political Repression in Uruguay (1971–1985)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Memories from Darkness

Part of the book series: Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology ((CGHA))

Abstract

During the 1970s and 1980s, the Uruguayan repressive system was part of a broader (geo) political movement which included other South American countries, as well as the coordination of specialized organisms and American agents. The establishment of dictatorship in Uruguay was preceded by the implementation of repressive measures and legal restrictions on citizens’ rights. According to the Parliament, “immediate security measures” were the only way to face internal war (Martínez 2005).

The declassification of American and Uruguayan files provided new evidence to prosecute civil President Juan María Bordaberry and Minister Juan Carlos Blanco, as they proved their possible connection to Plan Cóndor (Operation Condor) and the murder of dissident Uruguayan and Argentinean politicians on both sides of the Río de la Plata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Augé, M., 1996, Los no lugares. Gedisa, Buenos Aires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L., 1972, Mortuary Practices: Their Study and Their Potential. In Archaeological Perspective, edited by J. Brown, pp. 105–140. Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, J., 1995, Tombs for the Living ….or for the Dead. In Tombs for the Living, edited by T. Dillehay, pp. 229–280. Dumbarton, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión para la Paz, 2004, Informe Final de la Comisión para la Paz. Presidencia de la República, Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Huidobro, E., 2004, La Fuga de Punta Carrretas. Banda Oriental, Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M., 1975, Vigilar e Castigar Vozes, Río de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianotti, C. and López Mazz, J., 2002, Intensificación Ceremonial y Prácticas Mortuorias en la Localidad Arqueológica del Rincón de Los Indios (Rocha). Actas del X Congreso Uruguayo de Arqueología: La Arqueología Uruguaya ante los Desafíos del Nuevo Siglo (CD-ROM). Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Romero, F., 2002, Philosophy and Historical Archaeology. Foucault and a Singular Technology of Power Development at the Borderlands of Nineteenth Century, Argentina. Journal of Social Archaeology 2(3):402–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., editor, 1982, Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Informe de Madres y Familiares de Uruguayos Detenidos Desaparecidos, 2005, A Todos Ellos. Madres y Familiares de Detenidos Desaparecidos, Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lull, V., 1998, El Argar: La Muerte en Casa. Anales de Prehistoria y Arqueología 13–14:65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, V., 2005, Tiempos de Dictadura. Banda Oriental, Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mhemet, Y., Solla, H., and Mc.Cabe, B., 2005, Vicitim of Dictatorial Regime: Identification of Mr. Roberto Gomensoro Josman. Forensic Science International 30:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, F., 2004, Estudio del Material Óseo asociado a los Enterramientos del Sitio Los Indios. Manuscript on file, Taller II de Arqueología (Monographs), Departamento de Arqueología, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de la República, Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, J., 1984, Mortuary Variability. An Archaeological Investigation. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis, G., 1999. La Actividad Infantil en la Producción del Registro Arqueológico de Cazadores-Recolectores. Revista do Museo de Arqueología e Etnología 3: 263–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis, G., 2002, South America: In the Garden of Forking Paths. In Archaeology. The Widening Debate, edited by B. Cunliffe, W. Davies, C. Renfrew, pp. 193–244. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solla, H. and Mehmet, Y., 2000, Skeletal Remains of Dr. Eugenio Antonio Berríos Sagredo. Forensic Science International 116(2–3):201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J., 1977, Mortuary Practices and the Study of Prehistoric Social Systems. Advances in Archaeology Method and Theory 1:105–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Ch. II and Turner, J. 1992, The First Claim for Cannibalism in the Southwest. Walter Hough’s 1901 Discovery at Canyon Buttle Ruin 3, Northeastern Arizona. American Antiquity 57(4):661–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarankin, A., 2002, Paredes que Domesticam: Arqueología da Arquitetura Escolar Capitalista. O Caso de Buenos Aires. UNICAMP/FAPESP, Sao Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José María López Mazz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

López Mazz, J.M. (2009). An Archaeological View of Political Repression in Uruguay (1971–1985). In: Funari, P., Zarankin, A., Salerno, M. (eds) Memories from Darkness. Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics