Advertisement

Useful Intrusions of DNA Topology Into Experiments on Protein-DNA Geometry

  • Jason D. KahnEmail author
  • James R. Jenssen
  • Vasavi Vittal
Conference paper
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications book series (IMA, volume 150)

Abstract

Small DNA minicircles are useful for characterizing protein-induced DNA bending and twisting, because obfuscating effects of DNA flexibility are less important than in larger DNA. Our work on DNA geometry and flexibility in protein-DNA complexes has employed T4 ligase-mediated DNA cyclization to make minicircles. Experiments can be carried out as forward ligations, or equivalently protein binding to minicircles can be characterized. In every case we have studied, topological characterization of minicircle synthesis or properties has led to unexpected geometric or mechanistic conclusions. Examples concerning the catabolite activator protein, E. coli RNA polymerase, the Lac repressor, and the TATA-box binding protein are discussed. Topological results have the experimental advantages that they are qualitatively unmistakable and internally controlled: new topoisomers are readily identified even in small amounts, and they are formed in the same reaction as relaxed products. Simulations of topoisomer distributions are quite sensitive to geometrical and flexibility parameters, which helps set stringent constraints on possible structural/dynamic models. However, the disadvantage of a topological measurement is it is consistent with any combination of writhe and twist that sums to the observed ΔLK, so it is difficult to be confident that a structural/dynamic model is a unique solution.

Key words

Minicircle DNA bending DNA cyclization RNA polymerase TBP Lac repressor CAP 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    D. Shore, J. Langowski, and R.L. Baldwin, DNA flexibility studied by covalent closure of short fragments into circles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78: 4833–4837, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    P.J. Flory, U.W. Suter, and M. Mutter, Macrocyclization Equilibria. I. Theory, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98: 5733–5739, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S.D. Levene and D.M. Crothers, Ring Closure Probabilities for DNA Fragments by Monte Carlo Simulation, J. Mol. Biol., 189: 61–72, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.D. Kahn and D.M. Crothers, Measurement of the DNA bend angle induced by the catabolite activator protein using Monte Carlo simulation of cyclization kinetics, J. Mol. Biol., 276: 287–309, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. Zhang and D.M. Crothers, Statistical mechanics of sequence-dependent circular DNA and its application for DNA cyclization, Biophys. J., 84: 136–153, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R.S. Manning, J.H. Maddocks, and J.D. Kahn, A continuum rod model of sequence- dependent DNA structure, J. Chem. Phys., 105: 5626–5646, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S.S. Zinkel and D.M. Crothers, DNA bend direction by phase sensitive detection, Nature, 328: 178–181, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.D. Kahn and D.M. Crothers, Protein-induced bending and DNA cyclization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 6343–6347, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    N.A. Davis, S.S. Majee, and J.D. Kahn, TATA box DNA deformation with and without the TATA box-binding protein, J. Mol. Biol., 291: 249–265, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Brenowitz, A. Pickar, and E. Jamison, Stability of a Lac repressor mediated “looped complex”, Biochemistry, 30: 5986–5998, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J.R. Jenssen, The geometry and topology of DNA in binary and ternary complexes with E. coli RNA polymerase, Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2001Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J.D. Kahn and D.M. Crothers, DNA Bending in Transcription Initiation, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 58: 115–122, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J.R. Levin, B. Krummel, and M.J. Chamberlin, Isolation and Properties of Transcribing Ternary Complexes of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase Positioned at a Single Template Base, J. Mol. Biol., 196: 85–100, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S.C. Schultz, G.C. Shields, and T.A. Steitz, Crystal structure of a CAP-DNA complex: the DNA is bent by 90 degrees, Science, 253: 1001–1007, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    D.M. Crothers, J. Drak, J.D. Kahn, and S.D. Levene, DNA Bending, Flexibility, and Helical Repeat by Cyclization Kinetics, Methods Enzymol., 212B: 1–29, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Y. Zhang, Z. Xi, R.S. Hegde, Z. Shakked, and D.M. Crothers, Predicting indirect readout effects in protein-DNA interactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101: 8337–8341, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    T.E. Cloutier and J. Widom, DNA twisting flexibility and the formation of sharply looped protein-DNA complexes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102: 3645–3650, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Z. Bryant, M.D. Stone, J. Gore, S.B. Smith, N.R. Cozzarelli, and C. Bustamante, Structural transitions and elasticity from torque measurements on DNA, Nature, 424: 338–341, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    N.A. Becker, J.D. Kahn, and L.J. Maher, 3rd, Effects of nucleoid proteins on DNA repression loop formation in Escherichia coli, Nucleic Acids Res., 35: 3988–4000, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    J.L. Kim and S.K. Burley, 1.9 Å resolution refined structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of TATAAAAG, Nature Struct. Biol., 1: 638–653, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. Roychoudhury, A. Sitlani, J. Lapham, and D.M. Crothers, Global structure and mechanical properties of a 10-bp nucleosome positioning motif, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 13608–13613, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. Thästrom, P.T. Lowary, H.R. Widlund, H. Cao, M. Kubista, and J. Widom, Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences, J. Mol. Biol., 288: 213–229, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Y. Lorch and R.D. Kornberg, Near-Zero Linking Difference upon Transcription Factor IID Binding to Promoter DNA, Mol. Cell. Biol., 13: 1872–1875, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    J.D. Kahn, Topological effects of the TATA box binding protein on minicircle DNA and a possible thermodynamic linkage to chromatin remodeling, Biochemistry, 39: 3520–3524, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    K.M. Parkhurst, R.M. Richards, M. Brenowitz, and L.J. Parkhurst, Intermediate Species Possessing Bent DNA are Present Along the Pathway to Formation of a Final TBP-TATA Complex, J. Mol. Biol., 289: 1327–1341, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    S.F. Tolic-Norrelykke, M.B. Rasmussen, F.S. Pavone, K. Berg-Sorensen, and L.B. Oddershede, Stepwise bending of DNA by a single TATA-box binding protein, Biophys. J., 90: 3694–3703, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    F. Kouzine, S. Sanford, Z. Elisha-Feil, and D. Levens, The functional response of upstream DNA to dynamic supercoiling in vivo, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 15: 146–154, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    M. Amouyal and H. Buc, Topological Unwinding of Strong and Weak Promoters by RNA Polymerase: A Comparison Between the lac Wild-type and the UV5 Sites of Escherichia coli, J. Mol. Biol., 195: 795–808, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    H.B. Gamper and J.E. Hearst, A Topological Model for Transcription Based on Unwinding Angle Analysis of E. coli RNA Polymerase Binary, Initiation and Ternary Complexes, Cell, 29: 81–90, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    A. Revyakin, C. Liu, R.H. Ebright, and T.R. Strick, Abortive initiation and productive initiation by RNA polymerase involve DNA scrunching, Science, 314: 1139–1143, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    K.S. Murakami, S. Masuda, E.A. Campbell, O. Muzzin, and S.A. Darst, Structural basis of transcription initiation: an RNA polymerase holoenzyme- DNA complex, Science, 296: 1285–1290, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    D.G. Vassylyev, M.N. Vassylyeva, A. Perederina, T.H. Tahirov, and I. Artsimovitch, Structural basis for transcription elongation by bacterial RNA polymerase, Nature, 448: 157–162, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    G.Q. Tang and S.S. Patel, T7 RNA polymerase-induced bending of promoter DNA is coupled to DNA opening, Biochemistry, 45: 4936–4946, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    J. Müller, S. Oehler, and B. Müller-Hill, Repression of lac promoter as a function of distance, phase and quality of an auxiliary lac operator, J. Mol. Biol., 257: 21–29, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    R.A. Mehta and J.D. Kahn, Designed hyperstable Lac repressor-DNA loop topologies suggest alternative loop geometries, J. Mol. Biol., 294: 67–77, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    M. Lewis, G. Chang, N.C. Horton, M.A. Kercher, H.C. Pace, M.A. Schumacher, R.G. Brennan, and P. Lu, Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer, Science, 271: 1247–1254, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    A.M. Friedman, T.O. Fischmann, and T.A. Steitz, Crystal structure of lacrepressor core tetramer and its implications for DNA looping, Science, 268: 1721–1727, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    L.M. Edelman, R. Cheong, and J.D. Kahn, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer over ˜ 130 Basepairs in Hyperstable Lac Repressor-DNA Loops, Biophys. J., 84: 1131–1145, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    S. Semsey, K. Virnik, and S. Adhya, A gamut of loops: meandering DNA, Trends Biochem. Sci., 30: 334–341, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    S. Goyal, T. Lillian, S. Blumberg, J.C. Meiners, E. Meyhofer, and N.C. Perkins, Intrinsic curvature of DNA influences LacR-mediated looping, Bio-phys. J., 93: 4342–4359, 2007.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    M.A. Morgan, K. Okamoto, J.D. Kahn, and D.S. English, Single-molecule spectroscopic determination of lac repressor-DNA loop conformation, Bio- phys. J., 89: 2588–2596, 2005.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    J.D. Kahn, R. Cheong, R.A. Mehta, L.M. Edelman, and M.A. Morgan, Flexibility and Control of Protein-DNA Loops, Biophysical Reviews and Letters (BRL), 1: 327–341, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    M. Taraban, H. Zhan, A.E. Whitten, D.B. Langley, K.S. Matthews, L. Swint-Kruse, and J. Trewhella, Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein, J. Mol. Biol., 376: 466–481, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    E. Villa, A. Balaeff, and K. Schulten, Structural dynamics of the lac repressor-DNA complex revealed by a multiscale simulation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102: 6783–6788, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    D. Swigon, B.D. Coleman, and W.K. Olson, Modeling the Lac repressor- operator assembly: The influence of DNA looping on Lac repressor conformation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103: 9879–9884, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Y. Zhang, A.E. McEwen, D.M. Crothers, and S.D. Levene, Statistical- mechanical theory of DNA looping, Biophys. J., 90: 1903–1912, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Y. Zhang, A.E. McEwen, D.M. Crothers, and S.D. Levene, Analysis of In- Vivo Lac R-Mediated Gene Repression Based on the Mechanics of DNA Looping, PLoS ONE, 1: e136, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    S. Goyal, N.C. Perkins, and C.L. Lee, Nonlinear dynamics and loop formation in Kirchhoff rods with implications to the mechanics of DNA and cables, J. Comp. Phys., 209: 371–389, 2005.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    L. Bintu, N.E. Buchler, H.G. Garcia, U. Gerland, T. Hwa, J. Kondev, T. Kuhlman, and R. Phillips, Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: applications, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 15: 125–135, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    L. Saiz and J.M. Vilar, Multilevel deconstruction of the in vivo behavior of looped DNA-protein complexes, PLoS ONE, 2: e355, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    A. Travers, DNA topology: Dynamic DNA looping, Current Biology, 16: R838–R840, 2006.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    N.A. Becker, J.D. Kahn, and L.J. Maher, 3rd, Bacterial repression loops require enhanced DNA flexibility, J. Mol. Biol., 349: 716–730, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Y. Zhang and D.M. Crothers, High-throughput approach for detection of DNA bending and flexibility based on cyclization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100: 3161–3166, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason D. Kahn
    • 1
    Email author
  • James R. Jenssen
    • 2
  • Vasavi Vittal
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Collagen Matrix, Inc.Franklin LakesUSA
  3. 3.Atlantic Equities LLPLondonUK

Personalised recommendations