Advertisement

Closing the Loop on Protein-DNA Interactions: Interplay Between Shape and Flexibility in Nucleoprotein Assemblies Having Implications for Biological Regulation

  • Stephen D. Levene
  • Yongli Zhang
Conference paper
Part of the The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications book series (IMA, volume 150)

Abstract

The formation of DNA loops by proteins bound at distant sites along a single molecule is an essential mechanistic aspect of many biological processes including gene regulation, DNA replication, and recombination. The biological importance of DNA loop formation is underscored by an abundance of architectural proteins in cells such as HU, IHF, and HMGs, which facilitate looping by bending the intervening DNA between cognate protein-binding sites. We have developed a rigorous theory for DNA loop formation that connects the global mechanical and geometric properties of both DNA and protein, including previously neglected phenomena such as the conformational flexibility of protein domains. The theory is applied to the problem of loop-mediated gene repression in vivo by lac repressor.

Key words

DNA looping wormlike chain J factor gene regulation lac repressor AMS(MOS) subject classifications Primary 92C05 92C40 82D60 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E.D. Ross, P.R. Hardwidge, and L.J. Maher, HMG proteins and DNA flexibil-ity in transcription activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21: 6598–6605, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Yan, R. Kawamura, and J.F. Marko, Statistics of loop formation along doubl helix DNAs. Phys. Rev. E. Stat. Nonlin. Soft. Matter. Phys. 71: 061905, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G.J. Gemmen, R. Millin, and D.E. Smith, DNA looping by two-site restriction endonucleases: heterogeneous probability distributions for loop size and un-binding force. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 2864–2877, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G.J. Gemmen, R. Millin, and D.E. Smith, Dynamics of single DNA looping and cleavage by Sau3AI and effect of tension applied to the DNA. Biophys. J.91:4154–4165, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    L.E. Catto, S. Ganguly, S.E. milsom, A.J. Welsh, and S.E. Halford, Protein assembly and DNA looping by the FokI restriction endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 1711–1720, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Swigon B.D. Coleman, and W.K. Olson, Modeling the Lac repressor-operator assembly: The influence of DNA looping on Lac repressor confor-mation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:9879–9884, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    F. Vanzi, C. Broggio, L. Sacconi, and F.S. Pavone, Lac repressor hinge flexi-bility and DNA looping: Single molecule kinetics by tethered particle motion.Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 3409–3420, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    B. van den Broek, F. Vanzi, D. Normanno, F.S. Pavone, and G.J. Wuite, Real-time observation of DNA looping dynamics of Type IIE restriction en-zymes NaeI and NarI. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 167–174, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    L.E. Catto, S.R. Bellamy, S.E. Retter, and S.E. Halford, Dynamics and consequences of DNA looping by the FokI restriction endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 36: 2073–2081, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    N.J. Agrawal, R. Radhakrishnan, and P.K. Purohit, Geometry of mediating protein affects the probability of loop formation in DNA. Biophys. J. 94: 3150–3158, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Normanno, F. Vanzi, and F.S. Pavone, Single-molecule manipulation reveals supercoiling-dependent modulation of lac repressor-mediated DNA looping. Nucleic Acids Res., 2008.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Zhang, A.E. McEwen, D.M. Crothers, and S.D. Levene, Statistical-mechanical theory of DNA looping. Biophys. J. 90: 1903–1912, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Y. Zhang, A.E. McEwen, D.M. Crothers, and S.D. Levene, Analysis of in-vivo LacR-mediated gene repression based on the mechanics of DNA looping. PLoS ONE 1: e136, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. Schleif, DNA looping. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61: 199–223, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    K. Rippe, P.H. von Hippel, and J. Langowski, Action at a distance - DNA-looping and initiation of transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20: 500–506,1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. Rippe, Making contacts on a nucleic acid polymer.Trends Biochem. Sci. 26: 733–740, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    D. Shore and R.L. Baldwin, Energetics of DNA twisting. I. Relation between twist and cyclization probability. J. Mol. Biol. 170: 957–981, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D.M. Crothers, J. Drak, J.D. Kahn, and S.D. Levene, DNA bending, flexibil-ity, and helical repeat by cyclization kinetics. Methods Enzymol 212:3–29,1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Y. Zhang, and D.M. Crothers, Statistical mechanics of sequence-dependent cir-cular DNA and its application for DNA cyclization. Biophys. J. 84: 136–153,2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    V.A. Bloomfield, D.M. Crothers, and I.J. Tinoco, 2000. Nucleic Acids: Struc-tures, Properties and Functions. University Science Books, Herndon, VA. 800.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. Shimada, and H. Yamakawa, Ring closure probabilities for twisted wormlike chains: Applications to DNA. Macromolecules 17: 689–698, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    D. Shore and R.L. Baldwin, Energetics of DNA twisting. II. Topoisomer analysis.J. Mol. Biol. 170: 983–1007, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    S.D. Levene and D.M. Crothers, Topological distributions and the torsional rigidity of DNA. A Monte Carlo study of DNA circles. J. Mol. Biol. 189: 73–83, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    K.V. Klenin, A.V. Vologodskii, V.V. Anshelevich, V. Klishko, A.M. Dykhne, and M.D. Frank-Kamenetskii, Variance of writhe for wormlike DNA rings with excluded volume. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 6: 707–714, 1989.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    D.S. Horowitz and J.C. Wang, Torsional rigidity of DNA and length dependence of the free energy of DNA supercoiling. J. Mol. Biol. 173: 75–91, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    M.A. Watson, D.M. Gowers, and S.E. Halford, Alternative geometries of DNA looping: an analysis using the SfiI endonuclease. J. Mol. Biol. 298: 461–475, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    H. Benjamin and N. Cozzarelli, DNA-directed synapsis in recombination: Slith-ering and random collision of sites. The Robert A. Welch Foundation Confer-ences on Chemical Research 29: 107–126.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    H. Tsen and S.D. Levene, Supercoiling-dependent flexibility of adenosine-tract-containing DNA detected by a topological method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 2817–2822, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    G.D. van Duyne, A structural view of Cre-loxP site-specific recombination. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30: 87–104, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    S.M. Law, G.R. Bellomy, P.J. Schlax, and M.T. Record, In-vivo thermo-dynamic analysis of repression with and without looping in lac constructs -estimates of free and local lac repressor concentrations and of physical proper ties of a region of supercoiled plasmid DNA in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 230: 161–173, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    L. Bintu, N.E. Buchler, H.G. Garcia, U. Gerland, T. Hwa, J. Kondev, and R. Phillips, Transcriptional regulation by the numbers: models. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15: 116–124, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    L. Bintu, N.E. Buchler, H.G. Garcia, U. Gerland, T. Hwa, J. Kondev, T. Kuhlman, and R. Phillips, Transcriptional regulation by the numbers:applications. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15: 125–135, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    J. Müller, S. Oehler, and B. Müller-Hill, Repression of lac promoter as a function of distance, phase and quality of an auxiliary lac operator. J. Mol. Biol. 257: 21–29, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    N.A. Becker, J.D. Kahn, and L.J. Maher, 3RD, Bacterial repression loops require enhanced DNA flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 349: 716–730, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    N.A. Becker, J.D. Kahn, and L.J. Maher, 3RD, Effects of nucleoid proteins on DNA repression loop formation in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 35: 3988–4000, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    A.M. Friedman, T.O. Fischmann, and T.A. Steitz, Crystal structure of lac repressor core tetramer and its implications for DNA looping. Science 268:1721–1727, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    M. Lewis, G. Chang, N.C. Horton, M.A. Kercher, H.C. Pace, M.A. Schu-macher, R.G. Brennan, and P. Lu, Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer. Science 271: 1247–1254,1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    G.C. Ruben and T.B. Roos, Conformation of lac repressor tetramer in solution, bound and unbound to operator DNA. Microsc. Res. Tech. 36: 400–416, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    R.A. Mehta and J.D. Kahn, Designed hyperstable lac repressor·DNA loop topolo-gies suggest alternative loop geometries. J. Mol. Biol. 294: 67–77, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    L.M. Edelman, R. Cheong, and J.D. Kahn, Fluorescence resonance energy trans-fer over 130 basepairs in hyperstable lac repressor-DNA loops. Biophys. J. 84:1131–1145, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    P.H. von Hippel, On the molecular bases of the specificity of interaction of tran-scriptional proteins with genome DNA. In Biological Regulation and Development, R. F. Goldberger, editor. Plenum, New York, pp. 279–347, 1979.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    D. Pörschke, Persistence length and bending dynamics of DNA from electroop-tical measurements at high salt concentrations. Biophys. Chem. 40: 169–179,1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    M.C. Mossing and M.T. Record, Jr., Upstream operators enhance repression of the lac promoter. Science 233: 889–892, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    J.M. Vilar and L. Saiz, DNA looping in gene regulation: from the assembly of macromolecular complexes to the control of transcriptional noise. Curr. Opin.Genet. Dev. 15: 136–144, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    S. Sasse-DwighT and J.D. Gralla, Probing co-operative DNA-binding in vivo.The lac O1:O3 interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 202: 107–119, 1988.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    J. Yu, J. Xiao, X. Ren, K. Lao, and X.S. Xie, Probing gene expression in live cells, one protein molecule at a time. Science 311: 1600–1603, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen D. Levene
    • 1
  • Yongli Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Molecular and Cell Biology and PhysicsUniversity of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA

Personalised recommendations