Keys to a Sharp Mind: Providing Choice and Quality Programming in a Retirement Community

  • Jeanette S. Biermann
  • Paula E. Hartman-Stein
  • Paula E. Hartman-Stein
Chapter

Abstract

Keys to a Sharp Mind (K2SM) was a pilot project designed to change the way intellectual programming was produced for residents of the independent living ­section of a continuing care retirement community (CCRC). The intention was to apply current research in cognitive science that suggests age-related mental decline may be delayed or at least slowed by engaging in cognitively stimulating activities within a social context. The program was built on the idea that independent living residents will have greater motivation to participate in lifelong learning if they are given the opportunity to create and choose course offerings. In this chapter we delineate defining principles and program evaluation methodology along with ­lessons learned and the impact the project had on participants and subsequent ­programming at the facility. A list of the programs and suggestions for future implementations in similar retirement communities are provided.

Keywords

Depression Dementia Radar Marketing Assure 

References

  1. Bank, A. L., MacNeill, S. E., & Lichtenberg, P. A. (2000). Cross validation of the MacNeill-Lichtenberg decision tree: Triaging mental health problems in geriatric rehabilitation patients. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruel-Jungerman, E., Rampon, C., & Laroche, S. (2007). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity and memory: Facts and hypotheses. Review of Neuroscience, 18, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavanaugh, J. C. (1996). Memory self-efficacy as a moderator of memory change. In F. Blanchard-Fields & T. M. Hess (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive change in adulthood and aging (pp. 488–507). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185.Google Scholar
  5. Gould, E., Beylin, A., Tanapat, P., Reeves, A., & Shors, T. J. (1999). Learning enhances adult neurogenesis in the hippocampal formation. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 260–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall, B. L., & Bocksnick, J. G. (1995). Therapeutic recreation for the institutionalized elderly: Choice or abuse? Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 7, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartman-Stein, P., & Biermann, J. S. (2007). Literature review for Keys to a Sharp Mind, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  8. Hartman-Stein, P. E., Luther, J. L., Biermann, J., & Busko, S. (2007) Determining preferences and feasibility for instituting “brain healthy” lifestyle programs for older adults in a continuing care retirement community. Poster presentation at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference on Prevention of Dementia, Washington.Google Scholar
  9. Kasser, V. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). The relation of psychological needs for autonomy and relatedness to vitality, well-being, and mortality in a nursing home. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 935–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kempermann, G., Kuhn, H. G., & Gage, F. H. (1997). More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature, 386, 493–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Langer, E. J. (2009). Counterclockwise: Mindful health and the power of possibility. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  12. Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olson, A. K., Eadie, B. D., Ernst, C., & Christie, B. R. (2006). Environmental enrichment and voluntary exercise massively increase neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus via dissociable pathways. Hippocampus, 16, 250–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robertson, R. D. (1988). Recreation and the institutionalized elderly: Conceptualization of the free choice and intervention continuums. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 11, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodin, J. (1986). Aging and health: Effects of the sense of control. Science, 233, 1271–1276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rodin, J., & Langer, E. J. (1980). Aging labels: The decline of control and the fall of self-esteem. Journal of Social Issues, 36, 12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Russell, D. (1996). The UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. M. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scarmeas, N., & Stern, Y. (2003). Cognitive reserve and lifestyle. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 625–633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stern, Y. (Ed.). (2007). Cognitive reserve: Theory and applications. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Troyer, A. K., & Rich, J. B. (2002). Psychometric properties of a new metamemory questionnaire for older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P19–P27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeanette S. Biermann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paula E. Hartman-Stein
    • 3
  • Paula E. Hartman-Stein
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Healthy AgingKentUSA
  2. 2.Counseling PsychologyUniversity of AkronAkronUSA
  3. 3.Center for Healthy AgingKentUSA
  4. 4.Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Education, Health and Human ServicesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations