Advertisement

Tunable Detectors for Artificial Immune Systems: From Model to Algorithm

  • Paul S. Andrews
  • Jon Timmis
Chapter
Part of the Immunomics Reviews: book series (IMMUN, volume 3)

Abstract

Artificial immune systems (AIS) are often developed directly from textual descriptions of immune properties with little attempt to understand those properties free of an engineering domain or application. Here, we present an example of how an AIS can be developed based on an in-depth investigation of an immune model. This model describes how the activation thresholds of immune cells can be tuned based on their recent history of excitation events. Using this model we detail how a population of randomly generated, degenerate and tunable detectors can produce a response pattern to a particular antigenic stimulus. Our understanding of this model leads to the identification of how these ideas can be incorporated into the engineering domain, highlighting the response pattern as a pre-processing of input data. Based on this we extract a framework for incorporating degenerate, tunable detectors into an AIS. We then instantiate this framework by developing an AIS for pattern classification that shows promising results.

Keywords

Pattern Classification Activation Threshold Excitation Level Artificial Immune System Application Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andrews PS, Timmis J (2005) Inspiration for the next generation of artificial immune systems. In: Jacob C, Pilat ML, Bentley PJ, Timmis J (eds) Artificial immune systems, 4th international conference, ICARIS 2005. Vol 3627 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, New York, pp 126–138Google Scholar
  2. Andrews P, Timmis J (2007) Alternative inspiration for artificial immune systems: Exploiting Cohen’s cognitive immune model. In: Flower D, Timmis J (eds) In Silico immunology. Springer, New York, pp 119–137Google Scholar
  3. Carneiro J, Paixao T, Milutinovic D, Sousa J, Leon K, Gardner R, Faro J (2005) Immunological self-tolerance: Lessons from mathematical modeling. J Comput Appl Math 184:77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen IR (2000) Tending Adam’s Garden: Evolving the cognitive immune self. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen IR, Hershberg U, Solomon S (2004) Antigen-receptor degeneracy and immunological paradigms. Mol Immunol 40:993–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. de Castro LN, Timmis J (2002) Artificial immune systems: A new computational intelligence approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Freitas AA, Timmis J (2007) Revisiting the foundations of artificial immune systems for data mining. IEEE Trans Evolutionary Comput 11(4):521–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossman Z (1993) Cellular tolerance as a dynamic state of the adaptable lymphocyte. Immunol Rev 133:45–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossman Z, Paul WE (1992) Adaptive cellular interactions in the immune system: The tunable activation threshold and the significance of subthreshold responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(21):10365–10369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guzella TS, Mota-Santos TA, Caminhas WM (2007) Towards a novel immune inspired approach to temporal anomaly detection. In: de Castro LN, Von Zuben FJ, Knidel H (eds) Artificial immune systems, 6th international conference, ICARIS 2007. Vol 4628 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, New York, pp 119–130Google Scholar
  11. Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  12. Scherer A, Noest A, DeBoer RJ (2004) Activation-threshold tuning in an affinity model for the T-cell repertoire. Proc Royal Soc B 271(1539):609–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Secker A, Freitas AA (2007) WAIRS: Improving classification accuracy by weighting attributes in the airs classifier. In: Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC07), IEEE Press, pp 3759–3765Google Scholar
  14. Stepney S, Smith RE, Timmis J, Tyrrell AM, Neil MJ, Hone ANW (2005) Conceptual frameworks for artificial immune systems. Int J Unconventional Comput 1(3):315–338Google Scholar
  15. van den Berg HA, Rand DA (2004) Dynamics of T cell activation threshold tuning. J Theor Biol 228:397–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Watkins A, Timmis J, Boggess L (2004) Artificial immune recognition system (AIRS): An immune-inspired supervised learning algorithm. Genet Program Evolvable Mach 5(1):291–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul S. Andrews
    • 1
  • Jon Timmis
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of YorkHeslingtonUK

Personalised recommendations