Skip to main content

Tools and Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bioinformation Discovery
  • 945 Accesses

Abstract

Bioinformatics tools are frequently used in bioinformation discovery. A large number of such tools are currently available in the public domain for research in drug discovery. Here, we describe some of the commonly used tools. Many of these tools are often cited in this book. A brief description for each of these tools with their corresponding uniform resource locator address for availability is provided. It should be noted that this list is not complete and comprehensive. Hence, readers are encouraged to refer other information sources for bioinformatics tools and techniques. Bioinformatics tools described in this chapter are listed in alphabetical order below.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215: 403–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Argos P. An investigation of protein subunit and domain interfaces. Protein Eng. 1988;2:101–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm HJ. The computer program LUDI: a new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1992;6:61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burge C, Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol. 1997;268:78–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark M, Cramer RD, Van Opdenbosch N. Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field. J Comput Chem. 1989;10:982–1012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J. PHYLIP – Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics. 1989;5:164–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, et al. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. In: Walker JM, editor. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. USA: Humana Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangueane P, Sakharkar MK. T-Epitope Designer: A HLA-peptide binding prediction server. Bioinformation. 2005;1:21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, et al. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science. 2003;302:1364–1368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laskowski RA. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J Mol Graph. 1995;13:323–330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C. Predicting protein mutant energetics by self-consistent ensemble optimization. J Mol Biol. 1994;236:918–939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971;55:379–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 1992;356:83–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald IK, Thornton JM. Satisfying Hydrogen Bonding Potential in Proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994;238:777–793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol. 1970;48:443–453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker KC, Bednarek MA, et al. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J Immunol. 1994;152:163.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson WR. Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA. Methods Enzymol. 1990;183:63–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roterman IK, Lambert MH, Gibson KD, et al. A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. II. Phi-psi maps for N-acetyl alanine N’-methyl amide: comparisons, contrasts and simple experimental tests. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989;7:421–453.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993;234:779–815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ. RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20:374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3381–3385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WRP, van Gunsteren WF. The GROMOS software package for biomolecular simulations. In: Clementi E, Corongiu G, editors. Methods and techniques in computational chemistry: METECC-95. Cagliari, Italy: STEF; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol. 1981;147: 195–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 1995;8:127–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pandjassarame Kangueane .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kangueane, P. (2009). Tools and Techniques. In: Bioinformation Discovery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0519-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics