Tools and Techniques

  • Pandjassarame Kangueane


Bioinformatics tools are frequently used in bioinformation discovery. A large number of such tools are currently available in the public domain for research in drug discovery. Here, we describe some of the commonly used tools. Many of these tools are often cited in this book. A brief description for each of these tools with their corresponding uniform resource locator address for availability is provided. It should be noted that this list is not complete and comprehensive. Hence, readers are encouraged to refer other information sources for bioinformatics tools and techniques. Bioinformatics tools described in this chapter are listed in alphabetical order below.


Tools Techniques Server Prediction Alignment Software Algorithm Availability source 


  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215: 403–410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Argos P. An investigation of protein subunit and domain interfaces. Protein Eng. 1988;2:101–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Böhm HJ. The computer program LUDI: a new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1992;6:61–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burge C, Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol. 1997;268:78–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark M, Cramer RD, Van Opdenbosch N. Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field. J Comput Chem. 1989;10:982–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP – Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics. 1989;5:164–166.Google Scholar
  7. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, et al. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. In: Walker JM, editor. The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. USA: Humana Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  8. Kangueane P, Sakharkar MK. T-Epitope Designer: A HLA-peptide binding prediction server. Bioinformation. 2005;1:21–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, et al. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science. 2003;302:1364–1368.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Laskowski RA. SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J Mol Graph. 1995;13:323–330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee C. Predicting protein mutant energetics by self-consistent ensemble optimization. J Mol Biol. 1994;236:918–939.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee B, Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971;55:379–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lüthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 1992;356:83–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McDonald IK, Thornton JM. Satisfying Hydrogen Bonding Potential in Proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994;238:777–793.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol. 1970;48:443–453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Parker KC, Bednarek MA, et al. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J Immunol. 1994;152:163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pearson WR. Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA. Methods Enzymol. 1990;183:63–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Roterman IK, Lambert MH, Gibson KD, et al. A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. II. Phi-psi maps for N-acetyl alanine N’-methyl amide: comparisons, contrasts and simple experimental tests. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989;7:421–453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993;234:779–815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ. RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20:374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3381–3385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott WRP, van Gunsteren WF. The GROMOS software package for biomolecular simulations. In: Clementi E, Corongiu G, editors. Methods and techniques in computational chemistry: METECC-95. Cagliari, Italy: STEF; 1995.Google Scholar
  23. Smith TF, Waterman MS. Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol. 1981;147: 195–197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 1995;8:127–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Informatics Irulan Chandai AnnexPondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations