An “Informed” Intent Model: Incorporating Human Capital, Social Capital, and Gender Variables into the Theoretical Model of Entrepreneurial Intentions

  • Kevin Hindle
  • Kim Klyver
  • Daniel F. Jennings
Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 24)


This chapter was motivated by a belief, based on a substantial body of research, that prevailing theoretical models of entrepreneurial intensions are underspecified. Currently, such models as represented by the Shapero–Kreuger intentions model (Krueger et al., 2000) are highly focused on cognition in its more limited sense of the thinking process that occurs within an individual’s head rather than the broader, contextually embedded process of social cognition as conceived by Bandura (1977, 1986) and subsequent scholars. In the chapter, we develop six proportions derived from the literatures of human capital, social capital, and gender as they relate to entrepreneurship. We argue, when it comes to start-up intentions, the entrepreneurial mind is indeed broader than current theoretical models indicate. Accordingly, an enhanced model of informed entrepreneurial intent was developed and discussed.


Social Capital Human Capital Entrepreneurial Intention Entrepreneurial Opportunity Entrepreneurship Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (2003) Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, HE and Zimmer, C (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: Sexton, DL and Smilor, RW (eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship. New York: Ballinger, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson JR (1990) Cognitive Psychology and its Implications (3rd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Arenius P, Kovalainen A (2006) Similarities and differences across the factors associated with women s self-employment preference in the Nordic countries. International Small Business Journal 24: 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker T, Aldrich HE, Liou N (1997) Invisible entrepreneurs: The neglect of women business owners by Mass Media and Scholarly Journals in the United States. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 9: 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Bandura A (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Becker GS (1993) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bird B (1988) Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of Management Review 13: 442–453.Google Scholar
  11. Birley S (1989) Female entrepreneurs: Are they really different? Journal of Small Business Management 27: 32–37.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu P (1983) Forms of capital. In: Richarson J (ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.Google Scholar
  13. Brännback M, Krueger NF, Carsrud AL Elfving J (2007) “Trying” to be entrepreneurial. MPRA Paper No. 8814, posted 21. May 2008/22:58. Online at Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
  14. Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brush CG (1992) Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 16: 5–30.Google Scholar
  16. Carter S, Anderson S, Shaw E (2001) Women s Business Ownership: Review of Academic, Popular and Internet Literature. Report to the Small Business Service.Google Scholar
  17. Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins-Dodd C, Gordon IM, Smart C (2004) Further evidence on the role of gender in financial performance, Journal of Small Business Management 42: 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cozby P (1997) Methods in Behavior Research. London: Mayfield Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  20. Cromie S, Birley S (1992) Networking by female business owners in Northern Ireland. Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 18: 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Bruin A, Brush CG, Welter F (2006) Introduction to the special issue: Towards building cumulative knowledge on women s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30: 585–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Clercq D, Arenius P (2006) The role of knowledge in business start-up activity. International Small Business Journal 24: 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farr-Wharton R, Brunetto Y (2007) Women entrepreneurs, opportunity recognition and government-sponsored networks. Women in Management Review 22: 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fielden SL, Davidson MJ, Dawe AJ, Makin PJ (2003) Factors inhibiting the economic growth of female owned small businesses in North West England. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 10: 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forbes DP (1999) Cognitive approaches to new venture creation. International Journal of Management Reviews 1: 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Godwin L, Stevens C, Brenner L (2006) Forced to play by the rules: Theorizing how mixed-sex founding teams may benefit women entrepreneurs in male dominated contexts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30: 623–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Granovetter MS (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Granovetter MS (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greve A (1995) Networks and entrepreneurship – An analysis of social relations, occupational background, and use of contacts during the establishment process. Scandinavian Journal of Management 11: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hindle K (2004) Choosing Qualitative Methods for Entrepreneurial Cognition Research: a Canonical Development Approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 28: 575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hmieleski KM, Corbett AC (2006) Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management 44: 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoang, H. and Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship – A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing 18: 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jenkins M, Johnson G (1997) Entrepreneurial intentions and outcomes: A comparative causal mapping study. Journal of Management Studies 34: 895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Katz JA, Shepherd D (eds) 2003 Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, JAI volume 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kim JLS, Ling CS (2001) Work-family conflict of women entrepreneurs in Singapore. Women in Management Review 16: 204–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirzner IM (1979) Perception, opportunity and profit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kirzner IM (1973) Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Klyver K, Terjesen S (2007) Entrepreneurial network composition: An analysis across venture development stage and gender. Women in Management Review 22: 682–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kolvereid L (1996) Organizational employment versus self-employment: Reasons for career choice intentions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 20: 23–31.Google Scholar
  41. Krueger NF (2003) The cognitive psychology of entrepreneurship. In: Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction. Boston: Kluwer Academic, pp. 105–140.Google Scholar
  42. Krueger NF (1993) The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 18: 5–21.Google Scholar
  43. Krueger NF (2000) The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 24: 5–23.Google Scholar
  44. Krueger NF Brazeal DV (1994) Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18: 91–104.Google Scholar
  45. Krueger NF, Carsrud AL (1993) Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 5: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krueger NF, Dickson PR (1993). Self-efficacy and perceptions of opportunities and threats. Psychological Reports 722(3, pt.2.), 1235–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krueger NF, Dickson PR (1994) How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity. Decision Sciences 25: 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krueger NF, Reilly MD, Carsrud AL (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing 15: 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krueger NF, Brannback M, Carsrud A (2007) Watch Out, Isaac! Reciprocal causation in entrepreneurial intent. Paper delivered at the Australian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship (AGSE) Research Exchange Conference. Brisbane.Google Scholar
  50. Larson A, Starr JA (1993) A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17: 5–15.Google Scholar
  51. Lee DY, Tsang EWK (2001) The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth. Journal of Management Studies 38: 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lin N (1999) Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Matthews CH, Moser SB (1995) Family background and gender: Implications for interest in small firm ownership. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 7: 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Menzies TV, Doichon M, Gasse Y, Elgie S (2006) A longitudinal study of the characteristic, business creation process and outcome differences of Canadian female vs. male nascent entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 2: 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Menzies TV, Doichon M, Gasse Y (2004) Examining venture-related myths concerning women entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 9: 89–107.Google Scholar
  56. Minniti M, Arenius P, Langowitz N (2006) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2005 Report on women and entrepreneurship. Babson College and London Business School.Google Scholar
  57. Mitchell RK, Busenitz L, Lant T, McDougall PP (2002). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27: 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morales-Gualdron, ST, Roig S (2005) The new venture decision: An analysis based on the GEM project database. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 1: 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Orser BJ, Riding AL, Manley K (2006) Women entrepreneurs and financial capital. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30: 643–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ottoson H, Klyver K (2008) Entrepreneurial human and social capital – complements or substitutes? Paper presented at NCSB, Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
  61. Ripolles M, Blesa A (2005) Personal networks as fosterers of entrepreneurial orientation in new ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 6: 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ronstadt R (1988) The corridor principle. Journal of Business Venturing 3: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sanders J, Nee V (1996) Immigrant self-employment: The family as social capital and the value of human capital. American Sociological Review 61: 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schenkel MT, Hechavarria DM, Matthews CH (2009) The role of human and social capital and technology in nascent ventures. In Reynolds PD, Curtin RT (eds). New Firm Creation in the United States. Berlin: Springer, pp. 157–185.Google Scholar
  65. Shapero A (1982) Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In: Kent C, Sexton D, Vesper K (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  66. Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25: 217–226.Google Scholar
  67. Shaver KG, Scott LR (1991) Person, process, choice; The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 16: 23–45.Google Scholar
  68. Shepherd DA, Krueger NF (2002) An Intentions–Based Model of Entrepreneurial Teams Social Cognition. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 27: 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shook CL, Priem RL, McGee JE (2003) Venture creation and the enterprising individual: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management 29: 379–399.Google Scholar
  70. Singh RP (2000) Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition Through Social Networks. London: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  71. Timberlake S (2005) Social capital and gender in the workplace. Journal of Management Development 24: 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ucbasaran D, Westhead P (2002) Does entrepreneurial experience influence opportunity identification? In: Reynols PD, Autio E, Brush CG, Bygrave WD, Manigart S (eds). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.Google Scholar
  73. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Entrepreneurship Research Deakin UniversityAustralia and Visiting Professor of Entrepreneurship
  2. 2.Department of Entrepreneurship and Relationship ManagementPostdoc, Stanford University & University of Southern DenmarkKoldingDenmark
  3. 3.Andrew Rader Professor of Industrial DistributionTexas A&M UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations