Abstract
The United States federal government plays an active role in setting and implementing drug policy. Federal agencies define the legal status of drugs and penalties for their trafficking and misuse; enforce drug-control laws; fund and conduct drug-abuse research, treatment, prevention, and public-information campaigns; and conduct drug-control operations abroad. Federal spending on drug control has increased dramatically in recent decades, with the “War on Drugs”, and is now approximately 14 billion dollars. The balance between public-health and law-enforcement approaches to combating drug abuse historically has shifted back and forth; the most recent developments suggest a turn toward public health. The policymaking process is often driven by political concerns more than evidence, and the objectives and effectiveness of federal policy are hotly disputed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Some states impose controls on the sale and use of substances not covered under the federal schedules, such as nitrous oxide and amyl nitrite [11]. Pseudoephedrine is widely used in the manufacture of methamphetamine, and medicines containing pseudoephedrine are separately regulated under an amendment to the USA Patriot Act [18].
- 2.
The scheduling procedure may be bypassed when an international treaty requires controlling a drug, or “to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety” [2].
References
Alcohol Problems and Solutions (2008) DARE still fails to reduce alcohol and drug abuse. http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/youthissues/20081008112145.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2009
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (1987) Pub Law 570, 99th Cong., approved 27 Oct
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (1988) Pub Law 690, 100th Cong., approved 18 Nov
Battelle Memorial Institute (2008) Interim DFC program evaluation findings report. Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC
Bennett W, DiIulio J, Walters J (1996) Body count: moral poverty and how to win America’s war against crime and drugs. Simon and Schuster, New York
Bertram E, Blachman M, Sharpe K, Andreas P (1996) Drug war politics: the price of denial. University of California, Berkeley, CA
Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ (1996). Drug policy and human nature: psychological perspectives on the prevention, management, and treatment of illicit drug abuse. Springer, New York
Boggs Act of 1951 (1951) Pub Law No. 255, 82nd Cong., approved 2 Nov
Bulwa D (2003) U.S. raids firms selling items used by pot smokers. San Francisco Chronicle, Feb 25, A4
Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (2009) 2009 international narcotics control strategy report. Volume I: drug and chemical control. Department of State, Washington, DC
Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics (2002) US nitrous oxide laws. http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/dll/N20_state_laws.htm. Accessed 22 Jan 2009
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (2009) Identifying and selecting evidence-based interventions. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD
Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 (1984) Pub Law No. 473, 98th Cong., approved 12 Oct
Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (1970) Pub Law No. 513, 91st Cong., approved 27 Oct
Cook, D (2009) New drug czar gets lower rank, promise of higher visibility. Christian science monitor, 11 Mar. http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/03/11/new-drug-czar-gets-lower-rank-promise-of-higher-visibility. Accessed 24 Mar 2009
Davenport-Hines, R. (2002). The pursuit of oblivion: a global history of narcotics. W.W. Norton, New York
Drug Abuse Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1979 (1980) Pub Law 181, 96th Cong., approved 2 Jan
Drug Enforcement Administration (2005) The Combat Meth Act of 2005. http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/meth/q_a.htm. Accessed 23 Jan 2009
Drug Policy Alliance (2007) Legislative proposals for reform of the crack/cocaine disparity. http://www.drugpolicy.org/library/factsheets/raceandthedr/crack_cocaine.cfm. Accessed 31 Jan 2009
Eliason MJ (2007) Improving substance abuse treatment: an introduction to the evidence-based practice movement. SAGE, Los Angeles
Falco M (2004) U.S. federal drug policy. In: Lowinson JH, Ruiz P, Millman RB, Langrod JG (eds) Substance abuse: a comprehensive textbook. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 21–32
Federal Bureau of Prisons (2009) Quick facts about the bureau of prisons. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. http://bop.gov/news/quick.jsp. Accessed 20 Apr 2009
Ford GF (1975) Statement on receiving the report of the domestic council drug abuse task force. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=5325. Accessed 23 Jan 2009
Ford JT (2008) Plan Colombia: drug reduction goals were not fully met, but security has improved; U.S. agencies need more detailed plans for reducing assistance. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC
Gieringer D (2006) America’s hundred years war on drugs: centennial of the 1st congressional anti-drug law prohibiting opium in the Philippines. http://www.drugsense.org/dpfca/DrugWarCentennial1.htm. Accessed 24 Jan 2009
Gonzales M, McEnery K, Sheehan T, Mellody S (1986) America’s habit: drug abuse, drug trafficking, and organized crime: President’s commission on organized crime. DIANE, Derby, PA
Gonzales v. Raich (2005) 545 U.S. 1 (2005) 352 F.3d 1222. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-1454.ZS.html. Accessed 19 Apr 2009
Goodman C, Ahn R, Harwood R, Ringel D, Savage K, Mendelson D et al (1997) Market barriers to the development of pharmacotherapies for the treatment of cocaine abuse and addiction: final report. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
Institute of Education Sciences (2006) Impact evaluation of mandatory-random student drug testing. US Department of Education, Washington, DC. http://edicsweb.ed.gov/browse/browsecoll.cfm?pkg_serial_num=3306. Accessed 23 Jan 2009
International Opium Convention (1912). Translation 222. League of Nations, The Hague. http://www.tc.edu/centers/cifas/drugsandsociety/background/OpiumConvention.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2009
Kanof ME (2003) Youth illicit drug use prevention: DARE long-term evaluations and federal efforts to identify effective programs. General Accounting Office, Washington, DC
Kennedy R (1997) Race, crime, and the law. Pantheon Books, New York
King R (1972) The drug hang-up, America’s fifty year folly. Bannerstone House, Springfield, IL
Kolb L, Du Mez AG (1924) The prevalence and trend of drug addiction in the United States and factors influencing it. Public Health Reports 39(21):1179–1204
MacCoun R, Reuter P (2008) The implicit rules of evidence-based drug policy: a U.S. perspective. Int J Drug Policy 19(3):231–232
Manski CF, Pepper JV, Petrie CV (eds) (2001) Informing America’s policy on illegal drugs: what we don’t know keeps hurting us. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, p 11
Marijuana Policy Project (2008) State-by-state medical marijuana laws: how to remove the threat of arrest. Marijuana Policy Project, Washington, DC
Meyer J, Glover S (2009) U.S. won’t prosecute medical pot sales. Los Angeles Times, 19 Mar, B1
Moses C (2008) Do czars matter? an assessment of effectiveness of drug czars. MPSA Annual National Conference. Chicago, 3 Apr
Murphy P (1994) Keeping score: the frailties of the federal drug budget. RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA
Musto DF (1999) The American disease: origins of narcotic control. Oxford University, New York
Musto DF (n.d.). The history of legislative control over opium, cocaine, and their derivatives. http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/History/ophs.htm. Accessed 22 Jan 2009
Narcotic Control Act of 1956 (1956) Pub Law No. 728, 84th Cong., approved 18 July. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/bulletin/bulletin_1956-01-01_3_page005.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2009
Narcotic Manufacturing Act of 1960 (1960) Pub Law No. 429, 86th Cong., approved 22 Apr
National Criminal Justice Reference Service (2003) Evidence-based principles for substance abuse prevention. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. http://www.ncjrs.gov/ondcppubs/publications/prevent/evidence_based_eng.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2009
National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (2009) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD. http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov. Accessed 23 Jan 2009
National Research Council (2001) Informing America’s policy on illegal drugs: what we don’t know keeps hurting us. Commission on behavioral and social sciences and education. National Academies, Washington, DC
Nigro v. U.S. (1928) 276 U.S. 332. http://www.druglibrary.org/SCHAFFER/legal/l1920/Nigrovus.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2009
Office of the Press Secretary (2009) National D.A.R.E. day. The White House, Washington, DC. http://www.dare.com/home/tertiary/default1b34.asp. Accessed 15 Apr 2009
Orwin R, Cadell D, Chu A, Kalton G, Maklan D, Morin C, et al (2006) Evaluation of the national youth anti-drug media campaign: 2004 report of findings. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD
Prettyman Commission (1963) Report of the President’s advisory commission on narcotics and drug abuse. H.R. Rep. No. 1444, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. Cited in Gonzales M, McEnery K, Sheehan T, Mellody S (1986) America’s habit: drug abuse, drug trafficking, and organized crime: President’s commission on organized crime. DIANE, Derby, PA
Ringwalt C, Vincus AA, Ennett ST, Hanley S, Bowling JM, Yacoubian GS Jr et al (2008) Random drug testing in US public school districts. Am J Public Health 98(5):826–828
Sabet KA (2007) The “local” matters: a brief history of the tension between federal drug laws and state and local policy. J Global Drug Policy Prac 1(4). http://www.globaldrugpolicy.org/print.php?var=1.4.3. Accessed 22 Jan 2009
Sack JL (2001) DARE anti-drug program to shift strategy. Education Week 20(23):1–2
Satcher D (2001) Youth violence: a report of the surgeon general. United States Public Health Service, Washington, DC
Schaller M (1970) The federal prohibition of marihuana. J Social History 4(1):61–74
Shafer RP (1972) Marihuana: a signal of misunderstanding. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Shulgin AT (1988) Controlled substances: a chemical and legal guide to the federal drug laws. Ronin, Berkeley, CA
Sonnenreich MR, Roccograndi AJ, Bogomolny RL (1975) Handbook on the 1970 federal drug act. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL
The White House (2003) National drug control strategy: FY 2004 budget summary. Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC
The White House (2004) National drug control strategy: FY 2005 budget summary. Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC
The White House (2008) National drug control strategy: FY 2009 budget summary. Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC
The White House (2009) National drug control strategy: 2009 annual report. Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC
The White House (2009) Prevention programs. Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/prevent/programs.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2009
The White House (2009) Authorizing legislation. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/about/authorizing_legislation.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2009
The White House (2009) ONDCP homepage. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/about/index.html. Accessed 21 Apr 2009
Timberlake JH (1963) Prohibition and the Progressive Movement, 1900–1920. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
Timberlake JH, Lock ED, Rasinski KA (2003) How should we wage the war on drugs? Determinants of public preferences for drug control alternatives. Policy Studies J 31(1):71–88
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2008) World drug report 2008. United Nations, Vienna
United States Senate (1999) Senate report 106–293. Departments of labor, health and human services, and education and related agencies appropriation bill, 2001
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (2009) Border enforcement security task forces. http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/factsheets/080226best_fact_sheet.htm. Accessed 20 Apr 2009
Veillette C (2006) Plan Colombia: a progress report. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Veillette C (2009) Andean counterdrug initiative (ACI) and related funding programs: FY 2006 assistance. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Walker WO III (1989) Drug control in the Americas. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Walsh JM (2004) Fuzzy math: why the White House drug control budget doesn’t add up. FAS drug policy analysis bulletin, 10
Yamaguchi R, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM (2003) Drug testing in schools: policies, practices, and association with student drug use. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton
Zeese K (2002) Revising the federal drug control budget report: changing methodology to hide the cost of the drug war? Common Sense for Drug Policy, Washington, DC. http://www.csdp.org/research/ondcpenron.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hawken, A., Kulick, J.D. (2010). United States Federal Drug Policy. In: Johnson, B. (eds) Addiction Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0338-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0338-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0337-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0338-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)