Skip to main content

Temporal and Spatial Regulation of V(D)J Recombination: Interactions of Extrinsic Factors with the RAG Complex

  • Chapter
Book cover V(D)J Recombination

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((volume 650))

Abstract

In the course of lymphoid development, V(D)J recombination is subject to stringent locus-specific and temporal regulation. These constraints are ultimately responsible for several features peculiar to lymphoid development, including the lineage specificity of antigen receptor assembly, allelic exclusion and receptor editing. In addition, cell cycle phase-dependent regulation of V(D)J recombinase activity ensures that DNA rearrangement is completed by the appropriate mechanism of DNA repair. Regulation of V(D)J recombination involves interactions between the V(D)J recombinase—a heteromeric complex consisting of RAG-1 and RAG-2 subunits—and macromolecular assemblies extrinsic to the recombinase. This chapter will focus on those features of the recombinase itself—and in particular the RAG-2 subunit— that interact with extrinsic factors to establish patterns of temporal control and locus specificity in developing lymphocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fugmann SD, Villey IJ, Ptaszek LM et al. Identification of two catalytic residues in RAG1 that define a single active site within the RAG1/RAG2 protein complex. Mol Cell 2000; 5:97–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim DR, Dai Y, Mundy CL et al. Mutations of acidic residues in RAG1 define the active site of the V(D) J recombinase. Genes Dev 1999; 13:3070–3080.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Landree MA, Wibbenmeyer JA, Roth DB. Mutational analysis of RAG1 and RAG2 identifies three catalytic amino acids in RAG1 critical for both cleavage steps of V(D)J recombination. Genes Dev 1999; 13:3059–3069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akamatsu Y, Oettinger MA. Distinct roles of RAG1 and RAG2 in binding the V(D)J recombination signal sequences. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:4670–4678.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Difilippantonio MJ, McMahan CJ, Eastman QM et al. RAG1 mediates signal sequence recognition and recruitment of RAG2 in V(D)J recombination. Cell 1996; 87:253–262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Swanson PC, Desiderio S. V(D)J recombination signal recognition: distinct, overlapping DNA-protein contacts in complexes containing RAG1 with and without RAG2. Immunity 1998; 9:115–125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eastman QM, Villey IJ, Schatz DG. Detection of RAG protein-V(D)J recombination signal interactions near the site of DNA cleavage by UV cross-linking. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:3788–3797.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Swanson PC, Desiderio S. RAG-2 promotes heptamer occupancy by RAG-1 in the assembly of a V(D)J initation complex. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:3674–3683.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hiom K, Gellert M. A stable RAG1-RAG2-DNA complex that is active in V(D)J cleavege. Cell 1997; 88:65–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiu JX, Kale SB, Yarnell Schultz H et al. Separation-of-function mutants reveal critical roles for RAG2 in both the cleavage and joining steps of V(D)J recombination. Mol Cell 2001; 7:77–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuomo CA, Oettinger MA. Analysis of regions of RAG-2 important for V(D)J recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:1810–1814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirch SA, Rathbun GA, Oettinger MA. Dual role of RAG2 in V(D)J recombination: catalysis and regulation of ordered Ig gene assembly. EMBO J 1998; 17:4881–4886.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McMahan CJ, Difilippantonio MJ, Rao N et al. A basic motif in the N-terminal region of RAG1 enhances V(D)J recombination activity. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:4544–4552.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadofsky MJ, Hesse JE, Gellert M. Definition of a core region of RAG-2 that is functional in V(D)J recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:1805–1809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadofsky MJ, Hesse JE, McBlane JF et al. Expression and V(D)J recombination activity of mutated RAG-1 proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 21:5644–5650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Steen SB, Han JO, Mundy C et al. Roles of the “dispensable” portions of RAG-1 and RAG-2 in V(D)J recombination. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:3010–3017.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sekiguchi JA, Whitlow S, Alt FW. Increased accumulation of hybrid V(D)J joins in cells expressing truncated versus full-length RAGs. Mol Cell 2001; 8:1383–1390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Akamatsu Y, Monroe R, Dudley DD et al. Deletion of the RAG2 C terminus leads to impaired lymphoid development in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:1209–1214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang HE, Hsu LY, Cado D et al. The “dispensable” portion of RAG2 is necessary for efficient V-to-DJ rearrangement during B-and T-cell development. Immunity 2002; 17:639–651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Talukder SR, Dudley DD, Alt FW et al. Increased frequency of aberrant V(D)J recombination products in core RAG-expressing mice. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:4539–4549.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Z, Dordai DI, Lee J et al. A conserved degradation signal regulates RAG-2 accumulation during cell division and links V(D)J recombination to the cell cycle. Immunity 1996; 5:575–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin WC, Desiderio S. Regulation of V(D)J recombination activator protein RAG-2 by phosphorylation. Science 1993; 260:953–959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin WC, Desiderio S. Cell cycle regulation of V(D)J recombination-activating protein RAG-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:2733–2737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Desiderio S, Lin WC, Li Z. The cell cycle and V(D)J recombination. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1996; 217:45–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schlissel M, Constantinescu A, Morrow T et al. Double-strand signal sequence breaks in V(D)J recombination are blunt, 5′-phosphorylated, RAG-dependent and cell cycle regulated. Genes Dev 1993; 7:2520–2532.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang H, Ross AE, Desiderio S. Cell cycle-dependent accumulation in vivo of transposition-competent complexes between recombination signal ends and full-length RAG proteins. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:8478–8486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ross AE, Vuica M, Desiderio S. Overlapping signals for protein degradation and nuclear localization define a role for intrinsic RAG-2 nuclear uptake in dividing cells. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:5308–5319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang H, Chang FC, Ross AE et al. Ubiquitylation of RAG-2 by Skp2-SCF links destruction of the V(D)J recombinase to the cell cycle. Mol Cell 2005; 18:699–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Takata M, Sasaki MS, Sonoda E et al. Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J 1998; 17:5497–5508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Feeney AJ. Factors that influence formation of B-cell repertoire. Immunol Res 2000; 21:195–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakase H, Takahama Y, Akamatsu Y. Effect of CpG methylation on RAG1/RAG2 reactivity: implications of direct and indirect mechanisms for controlling V(D)J cleavage. EMBO Rep 2003; 4:774–780.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Whitehurst CE, Chattopadhyay S, Chen J. Control of V(D)J recombinational accessibility of the D beta 1 gene segment at the TCR beta locus by a germline promoter. Immunity 1999; 10:313–322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathieu N, Hempel WM, Spicuglia S et al. Chromatin remodeling by the T-cell receptor (TCR)-beta gene enhancer during early T-cell development: Implications for the control of TCR-beta locus recombination. J Exp Med 2000; 192:625–636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Whitehurst CE, Schlissel MS, Chen J. Deletion of germline promoter PD beta 1 from the TCR beta locus causes hypermethylation that impairs D beta 1 recombination by multiple mechanisms. Immunity 2000; 13:703–714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mostoslavsky R, Singh N, Kirillov A et al. Kappa chain monoallelic demrthylation and the establishment of allelic exclusion. Genes Dev 1998; 12:1801–1811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goldmit M, Ji Y, Skok J et al. Epigenetic ontogeny of the Igk locus during B-cell development. Nat Immunol 2005; 6:198–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stanhope-Baker P, Hudson KM, Shaffer AL et al. Cell type-specific chromatin structure determines the targeting of V(D)J recombinase activity in vitro. Cell 1996; 85:887–897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kwon J, Imbalzano AN, Matthews A et al. Accessibility of nucleosomal DNA to V(D)J cleavage is modulated by RSS positioning and HMG1. Mol Cell 1998; 2:829–839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Golding A, Chandler S, Ballestar E et al. Nucleosome structure completely inhibits in vitro cleavage by the V(D)J recombinase. EMBO J 1999; 18:3712–3723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kwon J, Morshead KB, Guyon JR et al. Histone acetylation and hSWI/SNF remodeling act in concert to stimulate V(D)J cleavage of nucleosomal DNA. Mol Cell 2000; 6:1037–1048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Baumann M, Mamais A, McBlane F et al. Regulation of V(D)J recombination by nucleosome positioning at recombination signal sequences. EMBO J 2003; 22:5197–5207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chowdhury D, Sen R. Stepwise activation of the immunoglobulin mu heavy chain gene locus. EMBO J 2001; 20:6394–6403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chowdhury D, Sen R. Transient IL-7/IL-7R signaling provides a mechanism for feedback inhibition of immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangements. Immunity 2003; 18:229–241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Johnson K, Calame K. Transcription factors controlling the beginning and end of B-cell differentiation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2003; 13:522–528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McMurry MT, Krangel MS. A role for histone acetylation in the developmental regulation of VDJ recombination. Science 2000; 287:495–498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tripathi R, Jackson A, Krangel MS. A change in the structure of Vbeta chromatin associated with TCR beta allelic exclusion. J Immunol 2002; 168:2316–2324.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Johnson K, Pflugh DL, Yu D et al. B-cell-specific loss of histone 3 lysine 9 methylation in the V(H) locus depends on Pax5. Nat Immunol 2004; 5:853–861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Morshead KB, Ciccone DN, Taverna SD et al. Antigen receptor loci poised for V(D)J rearrangement are broadly associated with BRG1 and flanked by peaks of histone H3 dimethylated at lysine 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:11577–11582.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Osipovich O, Milley R, Meade A et al. Targeted inhibition of V(D)J recombination by a histone methyltransferase. Nat Immunol 2004; 5:309–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Thomas LR, Miyashita H, Cobb RM et al. Functional analysis of histone methyltransferase g9a in B-and T-lymphocytes. J Immunol 2008; 181:485–493.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sims RJ 3rd, Reinberg D. Histone H3 Lys 4 methylation: caught in a bind? Genes Dev 2006; 20:2779–2786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Perkins EJ, Kee BL, Ramsden DA. Histone 3 lysine 4 methylation during the pre-B to immature B-cell transition. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1942–1947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chakraborty T, Chowdhury D, Keyes A et al. Repeat organization and epigenetic regulation of the DH-Cmu domain of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene locus. Mol Cell 2007; 27:842–850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu Y, Subrahmanyam R, Chakraborty T et al. A plant homeodomain in RAG-2 that binds Hypermethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 is necessary for efficient antigen-receptor-gene rearrangement. Immunity 2007; 27:561–571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Matthews AG, Kuo AJ, Ramon-Maiques S et al. RAG2 PHD finger couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with V(D)J recombination. Nature 2007; 450:1106–1110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Dover J, Schneider J, Tawiah-Boateng MA et al. Methylation of histone H3 by COMPASS requires ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:28368–28371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sun ZW, Allis CD. Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates H3 methylation and gene silencing in yeast. Nature 2002; 418:104–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee JS, Shukla A, Schneider J et al. Histone crosstalk between H2B monoubiquitination and H3 methylation mediated by COMPASS. Cell 2007; 131:1084–1096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Henry KW, Wyce A, Lo WS et al. Transcriptional activation via sequential histone H2B ubiquitylation and deubiquitylation, mediated by SAGA-associated Ubp8. Genes Dev 2003; 17:2648–2663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang Y. Transcriptional regulation by histone ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Genes Dev 2003; 17:2733–2740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kao CF, Hillyer C, Tsukuda T et al. Rad6 plays a role in transcriptional activation through ubiquitylation of histone H2B. Genes Dev 2004; 18:184–195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Xiao T, Kao CF, Krogan NJ et al. Histone H2B ubiquitylation is associated with elongating RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:637–651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Minsky N, Shema E, Field Y et al. Monoubiquitinated H2B is associated with the transcribed region of highly expressed genes in human cells. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:483–488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kirmizis A, Santos-Rosa H, Penkett CJ et al. Arginine methylation at histone H3R2 controls deposition of H3K4 trimethylation. Nature 2007; 449:928–932.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Flanagan JF, Mi LZ, Chruszcz M et al. Double chromodomains cooperate to recognize the methylated histone H3 tail. Nature 2005; 438:1181–1185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sims RJ 3rd, Chen CF, Santos-Rosa H et al. Human but not yeast CHD1 binds directly and selectively to histone H3 methylated at lysine 4 via its tandem chromodomains. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:41789–41792.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Huang Y, Fang J, Bedford MT et al. Recognition of histone H3 lysine-4 methylation by the double tudor domain of JMJD2A. Science 2006; 312:748–751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Li H, Ilin S, Wang W et al. Molecular basis for site-specific read-out of histone H3K4me3 by the BPTF PHD finger of NURF. Nature 2006; 442:91–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pena PV, Davrazou F, Shi X et al. Molecular mechanism of histone H3K4me3 recognition by plant homeodomain of ING2. Nature 2006; 442:100–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Shi X, Hong T, Walter KL et al. ING2 PHD domain links histone H3 lysine 4 methylation to active gene repression. Nature 2006; 442:96–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wysocka J, Swigut T, Xiao H et al. A PHD finger of NURF couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with chromatin remodelling. Nature 2006; 442:86–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Taverna SD, Ilin S, Rogers RS et al. Yng1 PHD finger binding to H3 trimethylated at K4 promotes NuA3 HAT activity at K14 of H3 and transcription at a subset of targeted ORFs. Mol Cell 2006; 24:785–796.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ruthenburg AJ, Allis CD, Wysocka J. Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3: intricacy of writing and reading a single epigeneiic mark. Mol Cell 2007; 25:15–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bienz M. The PHD finger, a nuclear protein-interaction domain. Trends Biochem Sci 2006; 31:35–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Mellor J. It takes a PHD to read the histone code. Cell 2006; 126:22–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Callebaut I, Mornon JP. The V(D)J recombination activating protein RAG2 consists of a six-bladed propeller and a PHD fingerlike domain, as revealed by sequence analysis. Cell Mol Life Sci 1998; 54:880–891.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gomez CA, Ptaszek LM, Villa A et al. Mutations in conserved regions of the predicted RAG2 kelch repeats block initiation of V(D)J recombination and result in primary immunodeficiencies. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:5653–5664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Noordzij JG, de Bruin-Versteeg S, Verkaik NS et al. The immunophenotypic and immunogenotypic B-cell differentiation arrest in bone marrow of RAG-deficient SCID patients corresponds to residual recombination activities of mutated RAG proteins. Blood 2002; 100:2145–2152.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Schwarz K, Gauss GH, Ludwig L et al. RAG mutations in human B-cell-negative SCID. Science 1996; 274:97–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Villa A, Sobacchi C, Notarangelo LD et al. V(D)J recombination defects in lymphocytes due to RAG mutations: severe immunodeficiency with a spectrum of clinical presentations. Blood 2001; 97:81–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Villa A, Santagata S, Bozzi F et al. Partial V(D)J recombination activity leads to Omenn syndrome. Cell 1998; 93:885–896.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Ramon-Maiques S, Kuo AJ, Carney D et al. The plant homeodomain finger of RAG2 recognizes histone H3 methylated at both lysine-4 and arginane-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:18993–18998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. West KL, Singha NC, De Ioannes P et al. A direct interaction between the RAG2 C terminus and the core histones is required for efficient V(D)J recombination. Immunity 2005; 23:203–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Desiderio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Desiderio, S. (2009). Temporal and Spatial Regulation of V(D)J Recombination: Interactions of Extrinsic Factors with the RAG Complex. In: Ferrier, P. (eds) V(D)J Recombination. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 650. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0296-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics