Skip to main content

Strategies to Explore New Approaches in the Investigation and Treatment of Osteosarcoma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Cancer Treatment and Research ((CTAR,volume 152))

Abstract

Studies in osteosarcoma over the past 40 years have led to a steady improvement in the overall outcome of patients with osteosarcoma. In the year 2008, we can expect greater than 60% overall survival for newly diagnosed non-metastatic appendicular osteosarcoma. However, to achieve this current outcome, many patients are treated with aggressive cytotoxic chemotherapy and ultimately are not cured, and some patients who would be curable even without this aggressive approach are likely treated and cured. And finally, patients presenting with metastatic disease and those whose tumors recur after standard approaches continue to do very poorly. We believe that in order to continue to make progress in the treatment of this disease, we must achieve two main objectives. Firstly, we must find biomarkers that prospectively and accurately identify newly diagnosed non-metastatic patients who will not be cured with current modalities.

We hope that the achievement of this goal will allow for innovative clinical studies in this high-risk population while not jeopardizing those patients who currently are cured using the available treatment approaches, and ultimately accelerate progress toward curing more patients. Secondly, we must develop entirely new approaches to the treatment of metastatic and recurrent osteosarcoma. Our approach has been to develop models of highly aggressive and less aggressive osteosarcoma, and to use these models to identify genetic alterations and signaling pathways that distinguish the two phenotypic behaviors. We have identified plasma membrane-cytoskeletal linker protein, ezrin, as one pathway that identifies aggressive biological behavior in mouse and dog osteosarcoma. Using ezrin as the initial discriminator, we have high ezrin expression to activation of mTOR signaling, suggesting a possible novel target for therapy of aggressive osteosarcoma. We have also linked β4 integrin signaling to metastatic behavior that also appears to be linked to mTOR signaling. Most recently, we have identified a critical relationship between mTOR signaling and the IGF I signaling pathway that may help point the way to combination targeting therapy aimed at blocking both mTOR and IGF signaling in these tumors. Finally, we have proposed a novel clinical trial design to begin to test agents targeted at recurrent, metastatic disease, and this also will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dahlin DC, Coventry MB. Osteogenic sarcoma: a study of six hundred cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49A:101-110.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, et al. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:776-790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyers PA, Schwartz CL, Krailo M, et al. Osteosarcoma: a randomized, prospective trial of the addition of ifosfamide and/or muramyl tripeptide to cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2004-2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kempf-Bielack B, Bielack SS, Jurgens H, et al. Osteosarcoma relapse after combined modality therapy: an analysis of unselected patients in the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS). J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:559-568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sandberg AA, Bridge JA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: osteosarcoma and related tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;145:1-30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Keith WN, Evans TRJ, Glasspool RM. Telomerase and cancer: time to move from a promising target to a clinical reality. J Pathol. 2001;195:404-414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Savage SA, Stewart BJ, Liao JS, et al. Telomere stability genes are not mutated in osteosarcoma cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2005;160:79-81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulaner GA, Huang HY, Otero J, et al. Absence of a telomere maintenance mechanism as a favorable prognostic factor in patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1759-1763.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders RP, Drissi R, Billups CA, et al. Telomerase expression predicts unfavorable outcome in osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3790-3797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strahm B, Malkin D. Hereditary cancer predisposition in children: genetic basis and clinical implications. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2001-2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wadayama BI, Toguchida J, Shimizi T, et al. Mutation spectrum of the retinoblastoma gene in osteosarcomas. Cancer Res. 1994;54:3042-3048.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Feugeas O, Guriec N, Babin-Boilletot A, et al. Loss of heterozygosity in the RB gene is a poor prognostic factor in patients with osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:467-472.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heinsohn S, Evermann U, Stadt UZ, et al. Determination of the prognostic value of loss of heterozygosity at the retinoblastoma gene in osteosarcoma. Int J Oncol. 2007;30:1205-1214.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wunder JS, Gokgoz N, Parkes R, et al. TP53 mutations and outcome in osteosarcoma: a prospective, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:1483-1490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang LL. Biology of osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer J. 2005;11:294-305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishijo K, Nakayama T, Aoyama T, et al. Mutation analysis of the RECQL4 gene in sporadic osteosarcomas. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:367-372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollak M, Sem AW, Richard M, et al. Inhibition of metastatic behavior of murine osteosarcoma by hypophysectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:966-971.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pollak M, Polychronakos C, Richard M. Insulin like growth factor I: a potent mitogen for human osteogenic sarcoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82:301-305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burrow S, Andrulis IL, Pollak M, et al. Expression of insulin-like growth factor receptor, IGF-1, and IGF-2 in primary and metastatic osteosarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 1998;69:21-27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mansky PJ, Liewehr DJ, Steinberg SM, et al. Treatment of metastatic osteosarcoma with the somatostatin analog OncoLar: significant reduction of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 serum levels. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;24:440-446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yeatman TJ. A renaissance for Src. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:470-480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Webb DJ, Donais K, Whitmore LA, et al. FAK-Src signalling through paxillin, ERK and MLCK regulates adhesion disassembly. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:154-161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Azuma K, Tanaka M, Uekita T, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin affects the metastatic potential of human osteosarcoma. Oncogene. 2005;24:4754-4764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hood JD, Cheresh DA. Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:91-100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khanna C, Wan X, Bose S, et al. The membrane-cytoskeleton linker ezrin is necessary for osteosarcoma metastasis. Nat Med. 2004;10:182-186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Faivre S, Kroemer G, Raymond E. Current development of mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:671-688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chawla SP, Sankhala KK, Chua V, et al. A phase II study of AP23573 (an mTOR inhibitor) in patients (pts) with advanced sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(suppl):9068.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chawla SP, Tolcher AW, Staddon AP, et al. Updated results of a phase II trial of AP23573, a novel mTOR inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced soft tissue or bone sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(suppl):9505.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wan X, Mendoza A, Khanna C, Helman LJ. Rapamycin inhibits ezrin-mediated metastatic behavior in a murine model of osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2406-2411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Muller A, Homey B, Soto H, et al. Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2001;410:50-56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Laverdiere C, Hoang BH, Yang R, et al. Messenger RNA expression levels of CXCR4 correlate with metastatic behavior and outcome in patients with osteosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:2561-2567.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Perissinotto E, Cavalloni G, Leone F, et al. Involvement of chemokine receptor 4/stromal cell-derived factor 1 system during osteosarcoma tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:490-497.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim SY, Lee CH, Midura BV, et al. Inhibition of the CXCR4/CXCL12 chemokine pathway reduces the development of murine pulmonary metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008;25:201-211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bacci G, Briccoli A, Longhi A, et al. Treatment and outcome of recurrent osteosarcoma: experience at Rizzoli in 235 patients initially treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2005;44:748-755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee J. Helman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, S.Y., Helman, L.J. (2009). Strategies to Explore New Approaches in the Investigation and Treatment of Osteosarcoma. In: Jaffe, N., Bruland, O., Bielack, S. (eds) Pediatric and Adolescent Osteosarcoma. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 152. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0284-9_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0283-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0284-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics