Abstract
Nurse Carolyn Harried walked quickly down the narrow halls of the Theodore Roosevelt Cancer Center (TRCC), rushing to complete her rounds of surgical patients. She could hear the rain pounding at the window, adding to her stress from the busy, difficult shift. Her last patient, Mrs. Surgerized, looked pale, but was sleeping quietly following her radical mastectomy. Nurse Harried glanced at the JP drain inserted at the end of surgery, and noticed there was more drainage since the last check. She jotted down the amount, so that she could record it in the computer’s new Intake/Output (I/O) module. Although she had been instructed to use tablet PCs for data entry, she preferred the desktop workstations to the cumbersome tablet setup. She found an open workstation and stared at the blinking Teddy Roosevelt cursor as the log-on process proceeded slowly. The program finally launched, and a couple of screens later she was on the I/O page where she recorded her numbers and printed out the report for Dr. Lerner, the Surgical Fellow on-call for the evening.
Dr. Lerner grabbed a cup of coffee, picked up his patients’ charts, and began his review. He was not happy with the new I/O format and wondered why the attending surgeons had not gotten to evaluate this module prior to rollout. He tried to decipher the I/O data, loaded the patient charts onto a cart, and made quick bedside rounds. He noticed that Mrs. Surgerized appeared pale, so he rechecked her I/O numbers which seemed to indicate that there had not been excessive drainage from the JP tube. He noted that a complete blood cell count (CBC) had been ordered for the morning, and he made a mental note to recheck this patient before tomorrow’s rounds.
Note: All names of people and places have been fictionalized for confidentiality purposes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Understanding and analyzing organizational structures. In: Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, eds. Managing Technological Change. New York: Springer; 2004.
Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11(3):207-216.
Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64(2-3):143-156.
Hagland M. Interoperability conundrum: EMR implementation options go beyond core vendor and best of breed. Healthc Inform. 2005;22(5):28-30, 32, 34.
Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Blyth AJ, Southon G, Dixon BJ. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(2):79-93.
Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Gaining physician acceptance. In: Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, eds. Managing Technological Change. New York: Springer; 2004.
Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(5):547-556.
Gill RA, Walker JM. Optimizing inpatient care. In: Walker JM, Bieber EJ, Richards F, eds. Implementing an Electronic Health Record System. London: Springer; 2005.
Ash JS, Sittig DF, Campbell E, Guappone K, Dykstra RH. An unintended consequence of CPOE implementation: shifts in power, control, and autonomy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:11-15.
Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Critical design (redesign) issues. In: Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, eds. Managing Technological Change: Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics. New York: Springer; 2004.
Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education. Acad Med. 1993;68(1):25-30.
Robbins SP, Judge T. Organizational Behavior. 12th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall; 2007.
iHealthBeat, California HealthCare Foundation. Online system reduces nurse documentation time. http://www.ihealthbeat.org/index.cfm?Action=dspItem&itemID=98572; October 2002.
Wong DH, Gallegos Y, Weinger MB, Clack S, Slagle J, Anderson CT. Changes in intensive care unit nurse task activity after installation of a third-generation intensive care unit information system. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(10):2488-2494.
Case J, Mowry MM, Welebob E, First Consulting Group, California HealthCare Foundation. The nursing shortage: can technology help?, ihealth reports. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation; 2002.
Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):69-84.
Ammenwerth E, Eichstadter R, Haux R, Pohl U, Rebel S, Ziegler S. A randomized evaluation of a computer-based nursing documentation system. Methods Inf Med. 2001;40(2):61-68.
Liaskos J, Mantas J. Measuring the user acceptance of a web-based nursing documentation system. Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(1):116-120.
Banet GA, Jeffe DB, Williams JA, Asaro PV. Effects of implementing computerized practitioner order entry and nursing documentation on nursing workflow in an emergency department. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006;20(2):45-54.
Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):505-516.
Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing – nurses’ perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(6):337-344.
Kossman SP. Perceptions of impact of electronic health records on nurses’ work. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:337-341.
Timmons S. The potential contribution of social science to information technology implementation in healthcare. Comput Inform Nurs. 2002;20(2):74-78.
Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Managing change: an overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(2):116-124.
Ash JS, Bates DW. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(1):8-12.
Dykstra R. Computerized physician order entry and communication: reciprocal impacts. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:230-234.
Österlund J, Lovén E. Information versus inertia: a model for product change with low inertia. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2005;22(6):547-560.
Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Kuperman GJ. A consensus statement on considerations for a successful CPOE implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(3):229-234.
Scott JT, Rundall TG, Vogt TM, Hsu J. Kaiser Permanente’s experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. BMJ. 2005;331(7528):1313-1316.
Fischer D, Koziol R, Paust M, Soley J. Aligning strategic project goals with organizational goals during technology implementations: hospitals and health systems. CherryRoad Technologies, Inc. http://www.cherryroad.com/Documents/Whitepapers/Whitepaper_GoalAlignment.pdf; 2003.
Wood D. Overcoming resistance to computerized EMR. http://www.nursezone.com/include/PrintArticle.asp?articleid=13957&Profile=Hospital%20profiles; 2005.
Ammenwerth E, Kutscha U, Kutscha A, Mahler C, Eichstadter R, Haux R. Nursing process documentation systems in clinical routine – prerequisites and experiences. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64(2-3):187-200.
Bertelsen P, Madsen I, Hostrup P. Work flow analysis prior to implementation of an Electronic Patient Record (EPR): a method to disclose inconsistencies between the paper based medical record and the EPR. In: Fieschi M, ed. Medinfo 2004: Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Medical Informatics. Fairfax, VA: IOS Press; 2004.
Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1197-1203.
Ahmad A, Teater P, Bentley TD, et al. Key attributes of a successful physician order entry system implementation in a multi-hospital environment. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(1):16-24.
Young D. CPOE takes time, patience, money, and teamwork. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60(7):635, 639-640, 642 passim.
Parker P. Solutions success: clinical documentation technology. Nurs Manage. 2002;33(2):39-40.
InfoLogix Mobile Intelligence. Computer wall mount workstation – Model 0-500 series. http://www.healthcare.infologixsys.com/products/Products/Wall-Mount-Workstation/O-Computer-Wall-Mounts/Retractable-Wall-Desk-O-500/default.asp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Albert, K., Gupta, N., Mason, T., Mehta, P. (2010). A Rough Ride at the Theodore Roosevelt Cancer Center. In: Einbinder, L., Lorenzi, N., Ash, J., Gadd, C., Einbinder, J. (eds) Transforming Health Care Through Information: Case Studies. Health Informatics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0269-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0269-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0268-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0269-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)