Social Disorganization Theory: Then, Now, and in the Future

  • Charis E. Kubrin
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

One of the most recognized facts about crime is that it is not randomly distributed across neighborhoods within a city. That is, crime does not occur equally in all areas; rather, it tends to cluster in certain locales but not others. It is for this reason that residents can often identify where the “good” and “bad” areas of a city are. Social disorganization theory takes this fact—the non-random distribution of crime—as a point of departure for explaining crime. It is one of only a handful of social structural theories of crime and the only one to consider why rates of crime vary across areas such as neighborhoods. Two key questions of interest for social disorganization theorists are as follows: (1) Why is crime higher in some neighborhoods than others? (2) Is there something about the characteristics of these neighborhoods themselves (above and beyond the people who live there) that fosters crime? Social disorganization theory has long occupied an important place in criminological thought and continues to do so well into the twenty-first century.


Crime Rate Collective Efficacy Central Business District Residential Mobility Social Disorganization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Bankston, C. L., III. (1998). Youth gangs and the new second generation: A review essay. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellair, P. E. (2000). Informal surveillance and street crime: A complex relationship. Criminology, 38, 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984). Crosscutting social circles. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Bursik, R. J. (1988). Social disorganization: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26, 519–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne, J. M., & Sampson, R. J. (1986). The social ecology of crime. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Chamlin, M. B. (1989). A macro social analysis of the change in robbery and homicide rates: Controlling for static and dynamic effects. Sociological Focus, 22, 275–286.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A., & Rankin, B. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 389–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fagan, J., & Wilkinson, D. (1998). Guns, youth violence, and social identity in inner cities. In M. Tonry & M. Moore (Eds.), Crime and justice, Volume 24 (pp. 105–188). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gans, H. (1968). The balanced community: Homogeneity or heterogeneity in residential areas? In H. Gans (Ed.), People and plans: Essays on urban problems and solutions (pp. 161–181). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Greenberg, S., Rohe, W. M., & Williams, J. R. (1982). Safe and secure neighborhoods: Physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  14. Horowitz, R. (1983). Honor and the American dream: Culture and identity in a Chicano community. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kornhauser, R. D. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kubrin, C. E. (2000). Racial heterogeneity and crime: Measuring static and dynamic effects. In D. A. Chekki (Ed.), Community structure and dynamics at the dawn of the new millennium (pp. 189–218). Stamford, CO: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kubrin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003a). New directions in social disorganization theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 374–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kubrin, C. E., & Weitzer, R. (2003b). Retaliatory homicide: Concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood culture. Social Problems, 50, 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kubrin, C. E., Stucky, T. D., & Krohn, M. D. (2008). Researching theories of crime and deviance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, M. T., & Martinez, R. (2006). Immigration and Asian homicide patterns in urban and suburban San Diego. In R. Martinez & A. Valenzuela (Eds.), Immigration and crime: Race, ethnicity, and violence (pp. 90–116). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, M. T., & Martinez, R. (2002). Social disorganization revisited: Mapping the recent immigration and black homicide relationship in northern Miami. Sociological Focus, 35, 363–380.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, M. T., Martinez, R., & Rosenfeld, R. (2001). Does immigration increase homicide? Negative evidence from three border cities. Sociological Quarterly, 42, 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martinez, R. (2006). Coming to America: The impact of the new immigration on crime. In R. Martinez Jr. & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Immigration and crime: Race, ethnicity, and violence (pp. 1–19). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Martinez, R., & Lee, M. T. (2000). On immigration and crime. Criminal justice 2000: Vol. 1. The nature of crime: Continuity and change (pp. 485–524). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  25. Mears, D. P. (2002). Immigration and crime: What’s the connection? Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14, 284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, W. B. (1958). Lower class culture as a generating milieu for gang delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 14, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (1925). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city ( Chapter 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Reid, L. W., Weiss, H. E., Adelman, R. M., & Jaret, C. (2005). The immigration-crime relationship: Evidence across US metropolitan areas. Social Science Research, 3, 757–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sampson, R. J. (1987). Communities and crime. In M. R. Gottfredson & T. Hirschi (Eds.), Positive criminology (pp. 91–114). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law and Society Review, 32, 777–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sampson, R. J. & Bean, L. (2006). Cultural mechanisms and killing fields: A revised theory of community-level racial inequality. In R. D. Peterson, L. J. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime: Inequalities of race, ethnicity, and crime in America (pp. 8–36). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sampson, R. J., Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, D. A., & Jarjoura, R. G. (1988). Social structure and criminal victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stark, R. (1987). Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime. Criminology, 25, 893–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2006). Structure and culture in African-American adolescent violence: A partial test of the code of the street thesis. Justice Quarterly, 23, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taylor, R. B., & Covington, J. (1993). Community structural change and fear of crime. Social Problems, 40, 374–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Warner, B. D., & Pierce, G. L. (1993). Reexamining social disorganization theory using calls to the police as a measure of crime. Criminology, 31, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warner, B. D., & Rountree, P. W. (1997). Local social ties in a community and crime model: Questioning the systemic nature of informal social control. Social Problems, 44, 520–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolfgang, M. E., & Ferracuti, F. (1967). The subculture of violence: Towards and integrated theory in criminology. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charis E. Kubrin
    • 1
  1. 1.George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations