Advertisement

SPATIAL ESTIMATION OF SOIL MOISTURE AND SALINITY WITH NEURAL KRIGING

  • Zhong Zheng
  • Fengrong Zhang
  • Xurong Chai
  • Zhanqiang Zhu
  • Fuyu Ma
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 294)

Abstract

The study was carried out with 107 measurements of volumetric soil water content (SWC) and electrical conductivity (EC) for soil profile (0-30 cm) and the estimating accuracy of ordinary kriging (OK) and back-propagation neural network (BPNN) was compared. The results showed that BPNN method predicted a slightly better accurate SWC than that of OK, but differences between both methods were not significant based on the analysis of covariance (ANOVA) test (P >0.05). In addition, BPNN performed much better in EC prediction with higher model efficiency factor (E) and ratio of prediction to deviation (RPD) (E=0.8044 and RPD=3.54) than that of OK (E=0.7793 and RPD=0.39). Moreover, a novel neural kriging (NK) resulting from the integration of neural network (NN) and ordinary kriging (OK) techniques was developed through a geographic information system (GIS) environment for obtaining trend maps of SWC and EC. There was no significance between results of NK and OK through trend maps. Comparing with OK, NK gives better spatial estimations for its great advantage of establishing spatial nonlinear relationships through training directly on the data without building any complicated mathematical models and making assumptions on spatial variations.

Keywords

Soil Moisture Artificial Neural Network Soil Water Content Ordinary Kriging Back Propagation Neural Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Boken, V.K., Hoogenboom G., Hook, J.E., Thomas, D.L., Guerra, L.C., Harrison, K.A. Agricultural water use estimation using geospatial modeling and a geographic information system, Agric. Water Manage, 2004, 67: 85–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brocca, L., Morbidelli, R., Melone, F., Moramarco, T.. Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of central Italy, Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 333: 356–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Emery, X. and Ortiz J. M.. Weighted sample variograms as a tool to better assess the spatial variability of soil properties. Geoderma, 2007, 140: 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farifteh, J., Van der Meer, F., Atzberger, C., Carranza, E.J.M.. Quantitative analysis of salt-affected soil reflectance spectra: A comparison of two adaptive methods (PLSR and ANN). Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 110: 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferreyra, R.A., Apezteguia, H.P., Sereno, R, Jones, J.W.. Reduction of soil water spatial sampling density using scaled semivariograms and simulated annealing. Geodenna, 2002, 110: 265–289.Google Scholar
  6. Gotway, C.A., Ferguson, R.B., Hergert,G.W., Peterson, T.A.. Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters. Am. J. Soil Sci., 1996, 60: 1237–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang, W.R. and Foo, S.. Neural network modeling of salinity variation in Apalachicola River. Water Research, 2002, 36: 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitamura, Y., Yano, T., Honna T., Yamamoto S. and Inosako, K.. Causes of farmland salinization and remedial measures in the Aral Sea basin—Research on water management to prevent secondary salinization in rice-based cropping system in arid land. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 85: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koike, K., Matsuda, S., Gu, B.. Evaluation of interpolation accuracy of neural kriging with application to temperature-distribution analysis. Mathematical Geology, 2001, 33: 421–448.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Li, Y., Shi,. Z., Wu, C.F., Li, H.X., Li, F.. Improved prediction and reduction of sampling density for soil salinity by different geostatistical methods. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2007, 6: 832–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Patel, R.M., Prasher, S.O., Goel, P.K., Bassi, R.. Soil salinity prediction using artificial neural networks. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc, 2002, 38: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rizzo, D.M., Dougherty, D.E.. Characterization of aquifer properties using artificial neural networks: neural kriging. Water Resources Research, 1994, 30: 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robinson, T.P. and Metternicht, G.. Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2006, 50: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sarangi, A., Singh M., Bhattacharya, A.K., Singh, A.K.. Subsurface drainage performance study using SALTMOD and ANN models. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 84: 240–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhong Zheng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fengrong Zhang
    • 1
  • Xurong Chai
    • 1
  • Zhanqiang Zhu
    • 1
  • Fuyu Ma
    • 1
  1. 1.China Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Shihezi UniversityShiheziChina

Personalised recommendations