Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas in Conducting Participatory Ecohealth Research

  • Crescenti Y. DakuboEmail author


The previous chapters outlined the research methodology and processes involved in conducting an ecohealth research project, and how these were operationalized through case studies. In this chapter we step out of the research process and reflect on some of the challenges and ethical dilemmas that participatory ecohealth research projects present and how we might respond to these challenges.


Research Team Community Member Research Process Ethical Dilemma Participatory Action Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abu-Lughod L (1988) Fieldwork of a dutiful daughter. In: Altorki S, Fawzi El-Solh C (eds Arab women in the field: studying your own society. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, pp 139–62Google Scholar
  2. Barnes B (1982) T.S. Kuhn and social science. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler J (1992) Contingent foundations: feminism and the question of “postmodernism”. In: Butler J, Scott JW (eds) Feminists theorize the political. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 3–21Google Scholar
  4. Cornwall A, Jewkes R (1995) What is participatory research?. Soc Sci Med 12:1667–1676Google Scholar
  5. Cotterill P (1992) Interviewing women: issues of friendship, vulnerability, and power. Women’s Stud Int Forum 15 (5/6:593–606Google Scholar
  6. England KVL (1994) Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Prof Geographer 46:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fanow M, Cook J (eds) (1991) Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  8. Flax J (1990) Thinking fragments: psychoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary west. University of California Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall BL (1992) From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. Am Sociol 23:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism as a site of discourse on the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud 14:575–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill-Collins P (1990) Learning from the outsider within the sociological significance of black feminist thought. In: Fanow M, Cook J (eds) 1991 Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, pp 35–59Google Scholar
  12. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB (1998) Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 19:173–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kobayashi A (1994) Coloring the field: gender, “race,” and the politics of fieldwork. Prof Geogr 1:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maguire P (1987) Doing participatory research: a feminist approach. School of Education, University of Massachusetts, Anherst, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Maguire P (1996) Considering more feminist participatory research: What’s congruency got to do with it? Qual Inq 2:106–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mosse D (1994) Authority, gender and knowledge: theoretical reflections on the practice of participatory rural appraisal. Dev Change 2:497–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mullings B (1999) Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum 30:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nast HJ (1994) Opening remarks on “Women in the field” Prof Geographer 46:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rifkin S (1994) Participtory research and health. Proceedings of the international symposium on participtory research in Health Promotion. Liverpool School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Liverpool, UK, Sept. 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thunder BayCanada

Personalised recommendations