Skip to main content

Rule Evaluation Model as Behavioral Modeling of Domain Experts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1358 Accesses

In this paper, we present an experiment to describe behavior of a human decision on the rule evaluation procedure, which is a post-processing procedure in data mining process, based on objective rule indices. The post-processing of mined results is one of the key factors for successful data mining process. However, the relationship between transitions of human criteria and the objective rule evaluation indices has never been clarified as behavioral viewpoints. By using a method based on objective rule evaluation indices to support the rule evaluation procedure, we have evaluated the accuracies of five representative learning algorithms to construct rule evaluation models of the actual data mining results from a chronic hepatitis data set. Further, we discuss the relationship between the transitions of the subjective criteria of a medical expert and the rule evaluation models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hilderman R.J. and Hamilton H.J. (2001) Knowledge discovery and measures of interest. Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tan P.N., Kumar V., and Srivastava J. (2003) Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns. In: Proc. of International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yao Y.Y. and Zhong N. (1999) An analysis of quantitative measures associated with rules. In: Proc. of Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, PAKDD-1999, 479–488

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ohsaki M., Sato Y., Kume S., Yokoi H., and Yamaguchi T. (2004) Comparison between objective interestingness measures and real human interests in medical data mining. In: Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems IEA/AIE-2004, LNAI 3029, 1072–1081

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abe H., Ohsaki M., Yokoi H., and Yamaguchi T. (2006) Implementing an integrated time-series data mining environment based on temporal pattern extraction methods? A case study of an interferon therapy risk mining for chronic hepatitis, In: JSAI2005 Workshops, LNAI 4012, 425–435

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ohsaki M., Kitaguchi S., Kume S., Yokoi H., and Yamaguchi T. Evaluation of rule interestingness measures with a clinical dataset on hepatitis. In: Proc. of ECML/PKDD-2004, LNAI 3202, 362–373

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ohsaki M., Abe H., Yokoi H., Tsumoto S., and Yamaguchi T. (2007) Evaluation of Interestingness Measures in Medical Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 41(3), 177–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Witten I.H. and Frank E. (2000) Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations, Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quinlan J.R. (1993) Programs for machine learning, Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  10. Runmelhart D. E., McClelland J. L. (1986) Parallel Distribute Processing, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  11. Platt J. (1999) Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In: Schoelkopf B., Burges C., and Smola A. (eds.), Advances in Kernel Methods-Support Vector Learning, MIT Press, 185–208

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frank, E., Wang, Y., Inglis, S., Holmes, G., and Witten, I.H. (1998) Using model trees for classification. Machine Learning 32(1) 63–76

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Holte R.C. (1993) Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning, 11, 63?–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hidenao Abe or Shusaku Tsumoto .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag US

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abe, H., Tsumoto, S. (2009). Rule Evaluation Model as Behavioral Modeling of Domain Experts. In: Social Computing and Behavioral Modeling. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0056-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0056-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0055-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0056-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics