Skip to main content

Magnetic Ions in Oxides

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Magnetic Oxides

Abstract

To establish the pattern of this book, a logical first step is to review the Periodic table of chemical elements, to identify the transition groups within it, and to explain the local influences of the chemical bonding environment in which the various ions reside in a crystal lattice of an oxide. By the terminology of transition groups is meant those elements for which the inner shells remain unfilled while electrons occupying outer shells participate in chemical bonding. Consequently, the electrons of the unfilled inner shells are responsible for a variety of magnetic properties because of the magnetic moments carried by their unpaired spins.

From the theory of atomic spectra, the angular momentum of the electron spin is coupled to the angular momentum that is derived from the motion of the electron in its orbit about the nucleus, that is, the orbital angular momentum. The strength of spin–orbit coupling is a key factor in determining the extent to which the orbital moment contributes to the magnetic properties and conversely, to what extent the spins interact with the lattice. When placed in a crystal lattice, the magnetic ion is subjected to two effective fields that separately influence the spin and orbital momenta – the crystal electric field of the lattice site that captures or “quenches” the orbital moment by a Stark effect, and the exchange interaction that orders the spin into a collective ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic state. The origin of the crystal and exchange fields is reviewed first. The role of spin–orbit coupling is examined later in relation to magnetocrystalline anisotropy and magnetostriction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Miller indices were developed to identify the various planes in a crystallographic lattice. The system is based on the values of the three intercepts of the plane with the x, y, and z axes expressed as the lowest integer values. The labeling convention for family of planes is {hkl} and an individual plane is (hkl). Alternatively, the normal axes to the planes are labeled < hkl > for the family and [hkl] for an individual axis.

  2. 2.

    The Aufbau concept can be used here directly because all of the electrons occupy orthogonal crystal-field states of the same orbital term under the influence of the same nuclear charge. When applied to molecular bonding that involves Coulomb fields of multiple nuclei, the applicability is limited by the covalent sharing of orbital states that are not fully orthogonal.

  3. 3.

    The reader is cautioned that these diagrams are used to sort out the electron occupancies of the orbital ground state in order to anticipate the quantum designation of the ground state. The virtue of the one-electron models is the ready insight that they can provide without the necessity of complex mathematical analysis and computation.

  4. 4.

    In collective-electron band theory that was introduced by Stoner [30], the Fermi level is used as the reference energy for electrical properties, and it has been found phenomenologically convenient to separate the spin populations into up (majority α) and down (minority β) spin bands based on the difference in energy between the upper and lower parts of the d-shell spin ladders depicted in Fig. 2.3. This model is then used to explain the net collective moment in the manner of a ferrimagnetic spin system.

  5. 5.

    It should be pointed out that this lifting of degeneracies does not include those of Kramers doublets, which are spin degeneracies that can be split only by magnetic fields. Kramers doublets occur with a noninteger spin quantum number, that is, S = 1 ∕ 2, 3/2, 5/2, etc., resulting from ions with odd numbers of unpaired electron spins. Care must be exercised in the use of the exchange field concept. It is not a true magnetic field in the Maxwell sense. It is born out of covalent bonding and the Pauli exclusion principle of indistinguishability and is therefore of electrostatic origin. It can be only a scalar and has neither the ability to polarize the spins that it gathers along a chosen direction nor to split Kramers doublets.

  6. 6.

    A point worthy of note concerns the infrequent situation of d 6 in a tetrahedral (O4) site. Such a case is Fe2 + substituting for Zn2 + in a ZnO lattice. According to Fig. 2.23, a pure Jahn–Teller effect is expected in the e g orbital ground states. The energy of this stabilization, however, would be significantly less than that of Mn3 + or Fe4 + in an O6 site because of the 4/9 reduction in the crystal-field strength combined with the lower valence charge of the Fe2 + cation. This occurrence of the J–T effect is analyzed by Goodenough [41].

  7. 7.

    For a comprehensive discussion of this effect with Mn3 + and Co2 + in octahedral sites, the reader is directed to Chap. III, Sect. 1E2 of Goodenough [40].

  8. 8.

    φ + is called the “bonding” state and is often designated by a subscript g (for gerade or even). The opposite effect occurs with the “antibonding” state φ, which would be indicated by a u (for ungerade or odd) subscript.

  9. 9.

    In this model, all electronic energies are referenced to the zero energy of the free ion. E a or E b is the algebraic sum of its ionic stabilization energy (the cation ionization potential or anion electron affinity) and the electrostatic potential from the charge on its neighboring ion.

  10. 10.

    When applied to ionic bonds, the covalent electrons are treated as initially localized on their nuclei, as in the case of the O2 − anion with its filled 2p shell. As a result, the Hund’s rule repulsion arising from a dominant e 2r ij internal exchange term is absent, which then precludes the possibility of itinerant ferromagnetism from an antibonding band.

  11. 11.

    A qualitative review of the valence-bond concept, featuring vivid illustrations of hybrid bond formations, can be found in Chang [51].

References

  1. M.J. Buerger, Elementary Crystallography, (John Wiley, New York, 1956)

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Borchardt-Ott, Crystallography, (Springer, New York, 1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. C.J. Ballhausen, Introduction to Ligand Field Theory, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.L. Schläfer and G. Gliemann, Basic Principles of Ligand Field Theory, (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.S. Griffith, The Theory of Transition-Metal Ions, (Cambridge University Press, London, 1961)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.H. Van Vleck, The Theory of Electric and Magnetic Susceptibilities, (Oxford University Press, London, 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  7. E.U. Condon and G.H. Shortley, The Theory of Atomic Spectra, (Cambridge University Press, London, 1963)

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.B. Kramers, Proc. Amsterdam Acad. Sci. 32, 1176 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 41, 208 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  10. W.G. Penney and R. Schlapp, Phys. Rev. 41, 194 (1932); R. Schlapp and W.G. Penney, Phys. Rev. 42, 666 (1932)

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Low, Paramagnetic Resonance in Solids, (Academic Press, New York, 1960), p. 15

    Google Scholar 

  12. C.J. Ballhausen, Introduction to Ligand Field Theory, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962), p. 93

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Low, Paramagnetic Resonance in Solids, (Academic Press, New York 1960) p. 22

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.H.L. Pryce and W.A. Runciman, Disc. Faraday Soc. 26, 34 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  15. G.F. Dionne and B.J. Palm, J. Magn. Reson 68, 355 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.T. Hutchings, Solid State Phys. 16, 227 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.H. Van Vleck, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 26 90 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  18. K.W.H. Stevens, Proc. Phys. Soc. A65, 209 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, Group Theory, Applications to the Physics of Condensed Matter, (Springer, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.A. Bethe, Ann. Phys 3, 133 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys. 3, 375 (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  22. C.J. Ballhausen, Introduction to Ligand Field Theory, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962), p. 100

    Google Scholar 

  23. L.E. Orgel, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1004 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.L. Schläfer and G. Gliemann, Basic Principles of Ligand Field Theory, (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969), Chapter 1

    Google Scholar 

  25. C.J. Ballhausen, Introduction to Ligand Field Theory, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962), p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.C. Slater, Phys. Rev. 35, 509 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Racah, Phys. Rev. 62, 438 (1942); G. Racah also Phys. Rev. 63, 367 (1943)

    Google Scholar 

  28. K.R. Lea, M.J.M. Leask, and W.P. Wolf, J. Chem. Phys. Solids 23, 138 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  29. L.E. Orgel, Introduction to Transition-Metal Chemistry: Ligand-Field Theory, (John Wiley, New York, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  30. E.C. Stoner, Proc. Leeds Phil. Soc. 2, 391 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  31. M.R. Ibarra, R. Mahendiran, C. Marquina, B. Garcia-Landa, and J. Blasco, Phys. Rev. B 57, R3217 (1998 II)

    Google Scholar 

  32. O.G. Holmes and D.S. McClure, J. Chem Phys. 26, 1686 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Y. Tanabe and S. Sugano, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 9, 753 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.M. Baker, B. Bleaney, and K.D. Bowers, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 69, 1205 (1956); also A.L. Kipling, P.W. Smith, J. Vanier, and G.A. Woonton, Can. J. Phys. 39, 1859 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  35. M.M. Schieber, Experimental Magnetochemistry, (John Wiley, New York, 1967), p. 250

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Abragam and M.H.L. Pryce, Proc. R. Soc. A205, 135 (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  37. H.A. Jahn and E. Teller, Proc. R. Soc. (London) A161, 220 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  38. H.A Jahn, Proc. R. Soc. (London) A164, 117 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  39. J.H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 57, 426 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  40. J.B. Goodenough, Magnetism and the Chemical Bond, (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1963), Chapter III, Sections IE and IF

    Google Scholar 

  41. J.B. Goodenough, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 25, 151 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Kaplan and B. Vekhter, Cooperative Phenomena in Jahn–Teller Crystals, (Plenum, New York, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. Cartmell and G.W.A. Fowles, Valency and Molecular Structure, (Butterworths, London, 1961), Chapter X

    Google Scholar 

  44. C.J. Ballhausen, Introduction to Ligand Field Theory, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962), p. 161

    Google Scholar 

  45. C.J. Ballhausen and H.B. Gray, Molecular Electronic Structures, an Introduction, (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. Wolfsberg and L. Helmholz, J. Chem Phys. 20, 837 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  47. G.F. Dionne, Covalent Electron Transfer Theory of Superconductivity, (MIT Lincoln Laboratory Technical Rept. 885, 1992), NTIS No. ADA2539757

    Google Scholar 

  48. G.F. Dionne, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08M913 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  49. L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, (Cornell University Press, New York, 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  50. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, (Wiley, New York, 1966), p. 90

    Google Scholar 

  51. R. Chang, Chemistry in Action, (Random House, New York, 1988), Chapter 9

    Google Scholar 

  52. E. Cartmell and G.W.A. Fowles, Valency and Molecular Structure, (Butterworths, London, 1961), pp. 92–94

    Google Scholar 

  53. C.J. Ballhausen and H.B. Gray, Molecular Electronic Structures, an Introduction, (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, MA, 1980), p. 84

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald F. Dionne .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dionne, G.F. (2009). Magnetic Ions in Oxides. In: Magnetic Oxides. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0054-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics