From tools and services to e-Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities
This paper presents tools and services, humanities researchers use to work with digital resources. It will then analyse how these tools and services can be brought together in one integrated research infrastructure empowered by e-Science tools and methodologies e-Science stands the development and deployment of a networked infrastructure and culture through which resources can be shared in secure environments. This networked infrastructure allows a culture of collaboration, in which new forms of collaboration can emerge, and new and advanced methodologies can be explored.
KeywordsData Item Digital Library Humanity Research Digital Resource Digital Repository
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Tobias Blanke and Mark Hedges. Providing linked-up access to cultural heritage data. In ECDL 2008 Workshop on Information Access to Cultural Heritage, Aarhus, September 2008.Google Scholar
- Tobias Blanke, Mark Hedges, and Stuart Dunn. E-science in the arts and humanities – from early experimentation to systematic investigation. In E-SCIENCE '07: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
- Stuart Dunn, Lorna Hughes, and Sheila Anderson. Virtual research environments in the arts and humanities. In Proceedings of the e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, September 2005.Google Scholar
- Joost Kircz. E-based humanities and e-humanities on a surf platform. Technical report, SURF-DARE, 1. June 2004.Google Scholar
- Carl Lagoze, Dean B. Krat, Sandy Payette, and Susan Jesuroga. What is a digital library anymore, anyway? D-Lib Magazine, (11), November 2005.Google Scholar
- Michael Nentwich. Cyberscience. Research in the Age of the Internet. Austrian Academy of Science Press, Vienna, 2003.Google Scholar
- Elaine G. Toms and Heather L O'Brien. Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e-humanist. Journal of Documentation, (64), 2008.Google Scholar