The Annual Cycle of Development of Trees and Process-Based Modelling of Growth to Scale Up From the Tree To the Stand

Chapter

Abstract

Climate change affects both the annual cycle of tree development and the processes related to tree growth. The annual cycle of development manifests as observable phenological events such as leaf unfolding, flowering and leaf fall, but also includes less apparent traits, such as changes in frost hardiness and photosynthetic capacity. Seasonality in these traits can be due either to a fixed sequence of events that take place even in a constant environment, or to fluctuations in environmental factors. Thus, in a constant environment, the latter mode of development displays no seasonality. In addition, and depending on the trait considered, the internal state of development affects the tree’s capacity to respond to environmental factors. Given that the effects of climate change on the seasonality of a particular phenological trait may depend on interactions between fixed and fluctuating development traits, in order to explore these effects the entire annual cycle of development must be modelled. The processes related to tree growth include photosynthesis, respiration and allocation at the level of the individual tree; at stand level they include resource availability and biotic interactions. In this chapter we present the general theory of the annual cycle of development of trees, with examples of climate change effects on phenological traits with different mode of development for tree species in the boreal, temperate and Mediterranean zone of Europe. A process-based model on tree growth is outlined, with focus on scaling up from the tree to the stand level in time and space. Examples of climate change are presented, based on a model that couples the annual cycle of development and the growth of trees. Phenological events are characterized by responses to temperature that are under strong selective pressure. Future lines of development in this field of research include an assessment of the adaptive potential of phenological events to climate change. An example of this genetic approach is also presented.

Keywords

Biomass Europe Attenuation Respiration Assimilation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is part of the strategic research program “Sustainable spatial development of ecosystems, landscapes, seas and regions” which is funded by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Conservation and Food Quality, and carried out by Wageningen University Research Centre. KK was also supported by the EU-FP6 Network of Excellence EVOLTREE (contract no. 016322). Joy Burrough advised on the English.

References

  1. Bergh, J., McMurtrie, R.E. and Linder, S. (1998) Climatic factors controlling the productivity of Norway spruce: A model-bases analysis. For. Ecol. Manag. 110, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buiteveld, J., Vendramin, G.G., Leonardi, S., Kamer, K. and Geburek, T. (2007) Genetic diversity and differentiation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands varying in management history. For. Ecol. Manag. 247, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cannell, M.G.R. (1990) Modelling the phenology of trees. Silva Carelica 15, 11–27.Google Scholar
  4. Cannell, M.G.R. and Smith, R.I. (1983) Thermal time, chill days and prediction of budburst in Picea sitchensis. J. Appl. Ecol. 20, 951–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cannell, M.G.R. and Thornley, J.H.M. (2000) Modelling the components of plant respiration: Some guiding principles. Ann. Bot. 85, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuine, I. (1998) Modelisation de la phenologie des arbres de la zone temperee et ses implications en biologie evolutive, Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronomique de Montpellier, Montpellier.Google Scholar
  7. Chuine, I., Cour, P. and Rousseau, D.D. (1998) Fitting models predicting dates of flowering of temperate-zone trees using simulated annealing. Plant Cell Environ. 21, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, M.B. and Kabinski, C. (1992). Changes in geographical range from greenhouse warming: effects on biodiversity in forests. In: Peters, R.L. and Lovejoy, T.E. (eds.), Global Warming and Biological Diversity. Yale University Press, Yale, pp. 297–309.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M.B. and Shaw, R.G. (2001) Range shift and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292, 673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuchigami, L.H., Weiser, C.J., Kobayashi, K., Timmis, R. and Gusta, L.V. (1982). A degree growth stage model and cold acclimation in temperate woody plants. In: P.H. Li and A. Sakai (eds.), Plant Cold Hardiness and Freezing Stress. Plant Proceedings of an International Seminar on Plant Hardiness Held at the Sapporo Educational and Cultural Hall. Sappora, Japan, August 11–14, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. Geburek, T. (2005). Sexual reproduction in forest trees. In: Geburek, T. and Turok, J. (eds.), Conservation and Management of Forest Genetic Resoucres in Europe. Arbora Publishers, ZvolenGoogle Scholar
  12. Goudriaan, J. and Van Laar, H.H. (1994) Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes. Kluwer, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. Grote, R. (1998) Integrating dynamic morphological properties into forest growth modelling: II Allocation and mortality. Forest Ecol. Manag. 111, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hampe, A. (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol. Lett. 8, 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamrick, J.L. (2004) Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. Forest Ecol. Manag. 197, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamrick, J.L. and Godt, M.J.W. (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil. T. Roy. Soc. B 351, 1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hänninen, H. (1990) Modelling the annual growth rhythm of trees: conceptual, experimental, and applied aspects. Silva Carelica 15, 35–45.Google Scholar
  18. Hänninen, H. (1995) Effects of climatic change on trees from cool and temperate regions: an ecophysiological approach to modelling of budburst phenology. Can. J. Bot. 73, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hänninen, H. and Kramer, K. (2007) A framework for modelling the annual cycle of trees in boreal and temperate regions. Silva Fenn. 41, 167–205.Google Scholar
  20. Hänninen, H. and Lundell, R. (2007). Dynamic models in plant ecophysiology. In: Taulavuori, E. and Taulavuori, K. (eds.), Physiology of Northern Plants Under Changing Environment. Research Signpost, Kerala, India, pp. 157–175.Google Scholar
  21. Hari, A.J. (1972) Physiological state of development in biological models of growth and maturation. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 9, 107–115.Google Scholar
  22. Hari, P.L. and Rasanen, P. (1970) A dynamic model of the daily heigth incement of plants. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 7, 375–378.Google Scholar
  23. Jump, A. and Penuelas, J. (2005) Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1010–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kellomäki, S., Hänninen, H. and Kolström, M. (1995) Computations on frost damage to Scots pine under climatic warming in boreal conditions. Ecol. Appl. 5, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kellomäki, S., Vaisanen, H., Hänninen, H., Kolström, T., Lauhanen, R., Mattila, U. and Pajari, B. (1992) A simulation model for the succession of the boreal forest ecosystem. Silva Fenn. 26, 1–18.Google Scholar
  26. Koski, V. and Sievänen, R. (1985). Timing growth cessation in relation to the variations in the growing season. In: P.M.A. Tigerstedt, P. Puttonen & V. Koski (eds). Crop Physiology of Forest Trees. Proceedings of an International Conference on Managing Forest Trees as Cultivated Plants held in Finland, July 23–28, 1985.Google Scholar
  27. Kramer, K. (1994a) A modelling analysis of the effects of climatic warming on the probability of spring frost damage to tree species in The Netherlands and Germany. Plant Cell Environ. 17, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kramer, K. (1994b) Selecting a model to predict the onset of growth of Fagus sylvatica. J. Appl. Ecol. 31, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kramer, K. (1995a) Modelling comparison to evaluate the importance of phenology for the effects of climate change in growth of temperate-zone deciduous trees. Climate Res. 5, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kramer, K. (1995b) Phenotypic plasticity of the phenology of seven European tree species in relation to climatic warming. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kramer, K., Buiteveld, J., Forstreuter, M., Geburek, T., Leonardi, S., Menozzi, P., Povillon, F., Schelhaas, M.J., du Cros, E.T., Vendramin, G.G. and van der Werf, D.C. (2008) Bridging the gap between ecophysiological and genetic knowledge to assess the adaptive potential of European Beech. Ecol. Modell., 333–353.Google Scholar
  32. Kramer, K., Friend, A., and Leinonen, I. (1996) Modelling comparison to evaluate the importance of phenology and spring frost damage for the effects of climate change on growth of mixed temperate-zone deciduous forests. Climate Res. 7, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kramer, K., Leinonen, I., Bartelink, H.H., Berbigier, P., Borghetti, M. Bernhofer, Ch., Cienciala, E., Dolman, A.J., Froer, O. Gracia, C.A., Granier, A., Grünwald, T. Hari, P. Jans, W., Kellomäki, S., Loustau, D., Magnani, F., Markkanen, T., Matteucci, G., Mohren, G.M.J., Moors, E., Nissinen, A., Peltola, H., Sabaté, S., Sanchez, A., Sontag, M., Valentini R. and Vesala, T. (2002) Evaluation of 6 process-based forest growth models using eddy-covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at 6 forest sites in Europe. Global Change Biol. 2002, 1–18.Google Scholar
  34. Kramer, K., Leinonen, I. and Loustau, D. (2000) The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impacts of climate change on growth of boreal, temperate and Mediterranean forests ecosystems: an overview. Int. J. Biometeorol. 44, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kropff, M. (1993). Mechanisms of the competition for water. In: Kropff, M. and H., V.L.H. (eds.), Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
  36. Leinonen, I. (1996a) Dependence of dormancy release on temperature in different origins of pinus sylvestris and betula pendula seedlings. Scand. J. Forest Res. 11, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leinonen, I. (1996b) A simulation model for the annual frost hardiness and freeze damage of Scots Pine. Ann. Bot. 78, 687–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leinonen, I., Repo, T., Hänninen, H. and Burr, K.E. (1995) A second-order dynamic model for the frost hardiness of trees. Ann. Bot. 76, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leonardi, S. and Menozzi, P. (1995) Genetic variability of Fagus sylvatica L. (beech) in Italy: the role of postglacial recolonization. Heredity 75, 35–44.Google Scholar
  40. Leuning, R. (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal- photosynthesis model for C-3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leuning, R., Kelliher, F.M., Depury, D.G.G. and Schulze, E.D. (1995) Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration: scaling from leaves to canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 1183–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Loustau, D., Berbigier, P. and Granier, A. (1992) Interception loss, throughfall and stemflow in a maritime pine stand. II. An application of Gash’s analytical model of interception. J. Hydrol. 138, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loustau, D., Berbigier, P., Roumagnac, P., Arruda-Pacheco, C., David, J.S., Ferreira, M.I., Pereira, J.S. and Tavares, R. (1996) Transpiration of a 64-year-old maritime pine stand in Portugal 1. Seasonal course of water flux through maritime pine. Oecologia 107, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mäkelä, A. and Hari, P. (1986) Stand growth models based on carbon uptake and allocation in individual trees. Ecol. Modell. 33, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mäkelä, A., Hari, P., Berninger, F., Hänninen, H. and Nikinmaa, E. (2004) Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity in Scots pine to the annual cycle of temperature. Tree Physiol. 24, 369–376.Google Scholar
  46. Mohren, G.M.J., Bartelink, H.H., Kramer, K., Magnani, F., Sabaté, S. and Loustau, D. (1999) Modelling long-term effects of CO2 increase and climate change on European forests, with emphasis on ecosystem carbon budgets. In: Ceulemans, R.J.M., Veroustraete, F., Gond, V. and van Rensbergen, J.B.H.F. (eds.), Forest Ecosystem Modelling, Upscaling and Remote Sensing. SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Netherlands, pp. 179–192.Google Scholar
  47. Parmesan, C. (2006) Ecological and evolutionairy responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 37, 912–929.Google Scholar
  48. Pelkonen, P. (1980) The uptake of carbon dioxide in Scots pine during spring. Flora 169, 386–397.Google Scholar
  49. Pelkonen, P. and Hari, P. (1980) The independence of the springtime recovery of CO2 uptake in Scots pine on temperature and internal factors. Flora 169, 398–404.Google Scholar
  50. Penning de Vries, F.W., Brunsting, A.H. and van Laar, H.H. (1974) Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach. J. Theor. Biol. 45, 339–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Petit, R.J. and Hampe, A. (2006) Some Evolutionary Consequences of Being a Tree. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reaumur, R.A.F.D. (1735) Observations du thermomètre, faites à Paris pendant l’année 1735, comparées avec celles qui ont été faites sous la ligne, à l’isle de France, à Alger et quelques unes de nos isles de l’Amérique. Mem. Paris Acad. Sci. 1735 545 ff.Google Scholar
  53. Rehfeldt, G.E., Tchebakova, N.M., Parfenova, Y.I., Wykoff, W.R., Kuzmina, N.A. and Milyutin, L.I. (2002) Intraspecific responses to climate in Pinus sylvestris. Global Change Biol. 8, 912–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Repo, T. (1992) Seasonal changes of frost hardiness in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Finland. Can. J. For. Res. 22, 1949–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Repo, T. (1993) Impedance spectroscopy and temperature acclimation of forest treesUniversity of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Joensuu, pp.53p.Google Scholar
  56. Repo, T. and Lappi, J. (1989) Estimation of standard error of impedance-estimated frost resistance. Scand. J. Forest Res. 4, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Repo, T., Mäkelä, A. and Hänninen, H. (1990a) Modelling frost resistance of trees. Silva Carelica 15, 61–74.Google Scholar
  58. Repo, T., Tuovinen, T. and Savolainen, T. (1990b) Estimation of an electrical model of plant tissue using the impedance locus. Silva Carelica 15, 51–59.Google Scholar
  59. Ryan, M.G. (1995) Foliar maintenance respiration of subalpine and boreal trees and shrubs in relation to nitrogen content. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 765–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryan, M.G., Hubbard, R.M., Pongracic, S., Raison, R.J. and Mcmurtrie, R.E. (1996) Foliage, fine-root, woody-tissue and stand respiration in Pinus radiata in relation to nitrogen status. Tree Physiol. 16, 333–343.Google Scholar
  61. Sarvas, R. (1972) Investigations on the annual cycle of development on forest trees active period. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 76, 110.Google Scholar
  62. Sarvas, R. (1974) Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees. Autumn dormancy and winter dormancy. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 84, 1–101.Google Scholar
  63. Spitters, C.J.T., Toussaint, H.A.J.M. and Goudriaan, J. (1986) Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modellingf canopy photosynthesis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 38, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thuiller, W., Albert, C., Araujo, M.B., Berry, P.M., Cabeza, M., Guisan, A., Hickler, T., Midgley, G.F., Paterson, J., Schurr, F.M., Sykes, M.T. and Zimmermann, N.E. (2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: Future challenges. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 9, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Valentine, H.T. (1988) A carbon-balance model of stand growth: a derivation employing the Pipe-model theory and the self-thinning rule. Ann. Bot. 62, 389–396.Google Scholar
  66. Weiner, J. (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 360–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Ecosystem StudiesWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations