Skip to main content

The Due Diligence Process and Pragmatic Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Due Diligence and the Business Transaction
  • 1938 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of the discussions thus far has been to explain the purpose of, and the process for, conducting a well-conceived due diligence investigation of a closely held business in the context of various types of business transactions. It has been explained that, in a nutshell, the party conducting due diligence is testing the veracity of the story that has been posited about the business that is the subject of the review. Throughout the investigation, the buyer or investor is seeking information about the four business cornerstones: the company, the business operations, the valuation, and the personnel who participate in the operation of the business (Chapter 2). Although the term due diligence describes a generic process of review, the level and focus of the scrutiny can vary greatly, depending on the company, type of transaction, and the deal terms. Therefore, it has been recommended that, before launching the due diligence investigation, a due diligence plan should be prepared (Chapter 2). The plan dissects the components of the transaction in light of each of the business cornerstones and thereby provides a bird’s-eye view of the most significant topics that the buyer has identified based on the information known at the time. The due diligence plan is an extremely helpful aid in formulating the strategy for the due diligence investigation of the transaction under consideration. After the plan has been fleshed out, the party conducting the due diligence should have a clear vision regarding what he or she wants verified before deciding whether to proceed with the proposed transaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The parties can include an obligation to negotiate in “good faith”; but, often, drafting these provisions leads to disputes regarding what constitutes good-faith negotiations in the context of the facts surrounding a particular deal (Chapter 8).

  2. 2.

    For example, the buyer might learn in preparing the letter of intent that the assets are owned by an offshore entity and not the domestic corporation, as originally thought.

  3. 3.

    Be careful about checking ownership of domain names. Usually (but not always) by accident, a founder or even an employee will personally register the domain name and fail to transfer it to the corporate entity. If a sale of the assets or even the business as a whole proceeds, the purchaser would not own the domain and would be forced to chase the owner postclosing to arrange (hopefully) the transfer. Worse yet, the owner would control the domain and the web site until the transfer occurred. The transfer of the domain and web site should, therefore, be part of closing conditions.

  4. 4.

    If the parties have entered into a binding purchase agreement, the seller will have a harder time justifying limitations on the buyer’s reasonable access. As the deal progresses, the buyer may want to be actively involved in the business so that he or she can learn the ropes and facilitate a smooth postclosing transition. The buyer can consider negotiating a deal term that requires assistance from the seller after the closing. In other circumstance, the buyer may actually engage the seller to assist with the transition or under a “smart hands” technology assistance agreement pursuant to which the seller will provide assistance with transition of technology to the buyer.

  5. 5.

    General solicitation and the accompanying heightened responsibility of an issue to take reasonable steps to verify accredited investor status are a result of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (also known as the JOBS Act).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Jeffrey W. Berkman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berkman, J.W. (2013). The Due Diligence Process and Pragmatic Considerations. In: Due Diligence and the Business Transaction. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-5087-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics