Abstract
The last two decades of the last millennium have seen the rise of the ‘post-modernist critique’ and a vigorous debate as to whether the modern industrial world has now transformed itself into the post-industrial world. At the heart of this debate is one about the nature of the economic and social forces shaping both collective and individual life. Giddens, in his recent analysis of the Third Way (1998), identifies three major revolutions taking place during this period. They are globalisation, the transformation in personal life affecting relations between individuals and communities, and in our relationship to nature. Here, the growth of the debate about genetic engineering and the environment has refocused our attention on the links between nature and science and nature and society. The central question is whether the dominant paradigm through which we view this relationship is still to be one around the notion of universal progress and scientific advancement in order to reshape the natural world, or is there to be a shift towards a more reciprocal relationship as is incorporated in the debate about ‘sustainability’? All these transformations have influenced urban life. The city looks very different at the beginning of the new millennium.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Postmodernity and the City
Dear M. 2000, The Postmodern Urban Condition, Oxford: Blackwells. Chapters 1 and 2. This is a good discussion about the rise of the postmodern critique and postmodern school of urban analysis based in and on Los Angeles.
Soja, E. 2000, Postmetropolis, Oxford: Blackwells. ‘Part 2, Six Discourses on the Postmetropolis’. Soja has been a leading writer working within this framework since 1989 when his book on Los Angeles challenged much of the contemporary thinking about the city and how it was to be analysed.
Globalisation
Friedman, J. 1995, ‘Where Do We Stand: A Decade of World City Research’. In Knox, P. and Taylor, P., eds, World Cities in a World System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapter 2, pp. 21–47. One of the most informative papers of the last decade which has helped to shape the agenda of research on world/global cities.
Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. 1996, Globalization in Question, Cambridge: Polity Press. Chapter 1, pp. 1–17. This is a valuable critique of the more determinist economic positions on globalisation.
Marcuse, P. 2000, ‘The Language of Globalization’, Monthly Review, July — August. This is a short but stimulating paper which questions the degree to which globalisation is in fact anything new.
Robertson, R. and Khondker, H.H., 1998, ‘Discourses of Globalization’. International Sociology, March, 13(1) 25–40. Robertson has been a significant writer in this area and one who draws attention to the long historical view necessary in understanding contemporary globalisation.
Sassen, S. 1991, The Global City: New York, London and Tokyo, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. A significant analysis of three key global cities.
Scholte, J.A. 2000, Globalization: A Critical Introduction, London: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 1, pp. 13–40. A very comprehensive account of contemporary globalisation which is clearly written and accessible to the reader.
Waters, M. 1995, Globalisation, London: Routledge, Chapter 1, pp. 1–10. This again is a clear and balanced introduction which allows the reader a good understanding of the main lines of debate and issues.
Copyright information
© 2002 David C. Thorns
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thorns, D.C. (2002). Global Cities. In: The Transformation of Cities. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-9031-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-9031-0_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-74597-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-9031-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)