Skip to main content

Industrial-Modern Cities

  • Chapter
The Transformation of Cities
  • 44 Accesses

Abstract

In order to understand the transformations that occurred with the onset of the industrial city, it will first be necessary to look at the origin of cities and the growth of the pre-industrial city. The definition of the city by Davis (1973:1), used in Chapter 1, sees the city as ‘concentrations of many people located close together for residential and productive purposes’. This sensitises us to two shifts that were important in the transformation that created the earliest cities. The most significant was probably the shift in the productive base of a society. The occupants of the cities were no longer engaged in agricultural activity and were not self-sufficient. Rather, they supplied services and commodities to the rural population and in exchange they gained their food and other requirements. In order for this new arrangement to occur, productivity had to increase to such an extent that the farmers were producing more than they and their families could consume. This required settled agriculture rather than nomadic hunting and gathering. This is one of the reasons for the earliest cities emerging in the places where they did. These regions had a benign climate and soil and water conditions conducive to agriculture — the growing of wheat and barley. Thus, we see the first cities emerging around 3500 bp in the fertile crescent area of Mesopotamia (Sjoberg 1973).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Elliott, B. and McCrone, D. 1982, The City Patterns of Domination and Conflict, London: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 3 ‘The Emergence of the Modern City’, pp. 51–77. This chapter from their book on the modern city gives a good account of how cities developed from independent centres in the medieval period to the ‘corporate’ cities of the late twentieth century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, D. 1980, ‘What Would a Non-sexist City be Like?’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 5(3) pp. 169–87. This is an important article which has had considerable impact on challenging the gender-blind nature of much urban analysis. Hayden also sets out a model for change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. 1986, Social Theory and the Urban Question (2nd edn) London: Hutchinson. This is still an excellent analysis of the work of the ‘modern’ theories of the city. Clearly written, it provides both an analysis of the various theories and a critique. Chapters 2, 3 and 4 would be particularly useful to extend this chapter’s discussion of the theories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M. and Warde, A. 1993, Urban Sociology, Capitalism and Modernity, London: Macmillan Press — now Palgrave Macmillan. Chapter 3, ‘Cities and Uneven Economic Development’, pp. 34–62, gives a good account of the way capitalist economic systems structure cities. It draws particularly upon the work done by economic geographers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 David C. Thorns

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thorns, D.C. (2002). Industrial-Modern Cities. In: The Transformation of Cities. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-9031-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics