Abstract
Every time a student sits down to write for us, he has to invent the university for the occasion — invent the university, that is, or a branch of it, like history or anthropology or economics or English. The student has to learn to speak our language, to speak as we do, to try on the peculiar ways of knowing, selecting, evaluating, reporting, concluding, and arguing that define the discourse of our community. Or perhaps I should say the various discourses of our community, since it is in the nature of a liberal arts education that a student, after the first year or two, must learn to try on a variety of voices and interpretive schemes — to write, for example, as a literary critic one day and as an experimental psychologist the next; to work within fields where the rules governing the presentation of examples or the development of an argument are both distinct and, even to a professional mysterious.
Education may well be, as of right, the instrument whereby every individual, in a society like our own, can gain access to any kind of discourse. But we well know that in its distribution, in what it permits and in what it prevents, it follows the well-trodden battle-lines of social conflict. Every educational system is a political means of maintaining or of modifying the appropriation of discourse, with the knowledge and the powers it carries with it.
— Foucault, T he D iscourse on L anguage
… the text is the form of the social relationships made visible, palpable, material.
— Bernstein, Codes, Modalities and the Process of Cultural Reproduction: A Model
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Aristotle. (1932). The Rhetoric of Aristotle (L. Cooper, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Hill & Wang.
Bartholomae, D. (1979). Teaching basic writing: An alternative to basic skills. Journal of Basic Writing, 2, 85–109.
Bartholomae, D. (1983). Writing assignments: Where writing begins. In P. Stock (Ed.), Forum (pp. 300–12). Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
Bereiter, C, & Scardamalia, M. (1985). Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of “inert knowledge.” In S. S. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bizzell, P. (1978). The ethos of academic discourse. College Composition and Communication, 29, 351–55.
Bizzell, P. (1982a). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/text, 3, 213–44.
Bizzell, P. (1982b). College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. Curriculum Inquiry, 12, 191, 207.
Bizzell, P., & Herzberg, B. (1980). “Inherent” ideology, “universal” history, “empirical” evidence, and “context-free” writing: Some problems with E. D. Hirsch’s The Philosophy of Composition. Modern Language Notes, 95, 1181–1202.
Coles, W. E., Jr. (1978). 77K plural 1. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Fish, S. (1980). 7s there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Flower, L. S. (1981). Revising writer-based prose. Journal of Bask Writing, 3, 62–74.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–87.
Hairston, M. (1978). A contemporary rhetoric. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lunsford, A. A. (1980). The content of basic writers’ essays. College Composition and Communication, 31, 278–90.
Maimon, E. P., Belcher, G. L., Hearn, G. W., Nodine, B. F., & O’Connor, F. X. (1981). Writing in the arts and sciences. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
Olson, D. R. (1981). Writing: The divorce of the author from the text. In B. M. Kroll & R. J. Vann (Eds.), Exploring speaking — writing relationships: Connections and contrasts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Perkins, D. N. (1985). General cognitive skills: Why not? In S. S. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ponsot, M., & Deen, R. (1982). Beat not the poor desk. Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
Rodriquez, R. (1983) Hunger of Memory. New York: Bantam.
Rose, M. (1983). Remedial writing courses: A critique and a proposal. College English, 45, 109–28.
Said, E. W. (1975) Beginnings: Intention and method. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shaughnessy, M. (1977). Errors and expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Bedford/St. Martin’s
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bartholomae, D. (2005). Inventing the University. In: Writing on the Margins. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-8439-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-8439-5_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-8439-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)