Skip to main content

The Study of Error

  • Chapter
Writing on the Margins
  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

It is curious, I think, that with all the current interest in “ Basic Writing,” little attention has been paid to the most basic question: What is it? What is “ basic writing,” that is, if the term is to refer to a phenomenon, an activity, something a writer does or has done, rather than to a course of instruction? We know that across the country students take tests of one sort or another and are placed in courses that bear the title, “ Basic Writing.” But all we know is that there are students taking courses. We know little about their performance as writers, beyond the bald fact that they fail to do what other, conventionally successful, writers do. We don’ t, then, have an adequate description of the variety of writing we call “ basic.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Mina Shaughnessy, Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. P. Corder, “Idiosyncratic Dialects and Error Analysis,” in Jack C. Richards, ed., Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (London: Longman, 1974), pp. 158–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donald McQuade, ed., Linguistics, Stylistics and The Teaching of Composition (Akron, Ohio: L & S Books, 1979), pp. 209–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. George Steiner, After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donald C. Freeman, “Linguistics and Error Analysis: On Agency,” in Donald McQuade, ed., Linguistics, Stylistics and The Teaching of Composition (Akron, Ohio: L & S Books, 1979), pp. 143–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. M. Goodman and C. L. Burke, Reading Miscue Inventory: Procedure for Diagnosis and Evaluation (New York: Macmillan, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Frederiksen, “Component Skills in Reading” in R. R. Snow, P. A. Federico, and W. E. Montague, eds., Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. E. Rumelhart, “Toward an Interactive Model of Reading,” in S. Dornic, ed., Attention and Performance VI (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kenneth S. Goodman, “Miscues: Windows on the Reading Process,” in Kenneth S. Goodman, ed., Miscue Analysis: Applications to Reading Instruction (Urbana, Illinois: ERIC, 1977), pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nathalie Bailey, Carolyn Madden, and Stephen D. Krashen, “Is There a ‘ Natural Sequence’ in Adult Second Language Learning?” Language Learning, 24 (June, 1974), 235–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2005 Bedford/St. Martin’s

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartholomae, D. (2005). The Study of Error. In: Writing on the Margins. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-8439-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics