Advertisement

Writing Brazilian Culture

  • Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond
Part of the New Directions in Latino American Cultures book series (NDLAC)

Abstract

In Casa-Grande e Senzala (The Plantation Manor and the Slave Barracks, 1933),1 Gilberto Freyre casts the intimate contact between masters and slaves as the origin for Brazilian “hybridity.” Because he emphasizes the “cultural” and “atmospheric” transmission of identity his analysis has been widely embraced as a progressive departure from eugenicist interpretations of national character.2 What critics have failed to see is that Freyre employs these nonbiological forms of assimilation to produce a symbolically Africanized, genetically white figure as the prototype for “interracial” synthesis. This chapter shows how Freyrean hybridity proffers an ultimately exclusionary brand of assimilation that constitutes the plantation master, or the figure who emblematizes that identity, as the amalgamation of both terms of the dialectic of Brazilian culture. As Monica Kaup and Debra Rosenthal show, to utter “We are creole” is implicitly to be situated in the domain of Austin’s linguistic performative (89). Accordingly, in my reading of Freyre’s discussion of the writing process, I address his substitution of biological race “mixture” with mimetic mestiçagem, conceptualizing his text as a speech-act that produces a particular form of mestiçagem as it describes it.

Keywords

African Descent Plantation Manor Brazilian Society African Culture Oral Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Benzaquen de Araújo, Ricardo. Guerra e Paz em Casa-Grande e Senzala e a Obra de Gilberto Freyre nos Anos 30. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira S.A., 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Freyre, Gilberto. Casa-Grande e Senzala. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. — —. “Como e Porque Esrevi Casa-Grande e Senzala.” Como e Porque Sou e Não Sou Sociólogo. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. —. Novo Mundo nos Trópicos. São Paulo: Ed. Nacional/EDUSP, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. —. “Reinterpretando José de Alencar.” Vida, Forma e Cor. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 1962.Google Scholar
  6. —. Sobrados e Mucambos, vol. 3. Ro de Janeiro: José Olympio, 1951.Google Scholar
  7. Garcia Canclini, Nestor. Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. Goldberg, David Theo. Racial Subjects: Writing on Race in America. New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
  9. Haberly, David. “Abolitionism in Brazil: Anti-Slavery and Anti-Slave”. Luso-Brazilian Review 9.2. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. Kaup, Monica and Rosenthal, Debra. J. Mixing Race, Mixing Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Lima, Tânia. Unpublished poem, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. Mota, Carlos Guilherme. Ideologia de Cultura Brasileira. São Paulo: Editora Atica, 1980.Google Scholar
  13. Romero, Silvio. Machado de Assis. Estudo Comparativo de Literatura Brasileira. Ro de Janeiro: Laemmert, 1897.Google Scholar
  14. Schwarcz, Lilia Moritz. O Espetáculo das Raças: Cientistas, Instituições e Questão Racial no Brasil, 1870–1930. São Paulo: Compahia das Letras, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. Sommer, Doris. Foundational Fictions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. Ventura, Roberto. Estilo Tropical. São Paulo: Schwarcz Ltda., 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Isfahani-Hammond

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations