Negotiating and Resolving Conflicts in India

  • Rajesh Kumar
  • Anand Kumar Sethi

Abstract

As we know, the ability to negotiate is an important managerial skill. Whether dealing with employees, external stakeholders, or other business partners, managers must possess the skill to negotiate effectively. Managerial effectiveness in negotiating will determine whether a joint venture deal is signed, or a valuable employee is retained by a company, even though he/she may have other more lucrative offers. Negotiation is most fundamentally a tool for resolving conflict when actors have goals that are partially congruent and partially conflicting. If there were complete goal congruency, there would be no need for negotiation and likewise if the goals were completely incongruent, there would be no basis for negotiation.

Keywords

Europe Volatility Stake Harness Concession 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The epigraphs in this chapter are drawn from Henry Ford. Cited in G.R. Shell (1999). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People, p. 76. New York: Penguin; cited inGoogle Scholar
  2. W. Mastenbroek (1999). “Negotiating as Emotion Management,” p. 49. Theory, Culture, and Society, 16: 49–73; C. Wilhelm (2002). “Part 3: Doing Business in India.” Asia Times, February 20; M. Kammeyer (2001). The other customs barrier. Export America, April, pp. 32–33; Comment of a Danish manager. Cited inGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Hughes (2002). A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Chinese and Indian Negotiating Behavior. Unpublished Masters thesis, Aarhus School of Business, Denmark; Comment of a Danish manager in a personal interview with one of the authors.Google Scholar
  4. 1.
    N.J. Adler (2002). International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, p. 210. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    L. Copeland and L. Griggs (1985). Going International: How to Make Friends and Deal Effectively in the Global Market Place. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  6. 3.
    M. Watkins (1999). “Negotiating in a Complex World.” Negotiation Journal, July, pp. 245–270; S. Weiss (1993). “Analysis of Complex Negotiations in International Business: The RBC perspective.” Organization Science, 4: 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 4.
    D.A. Lax and J.K. Sebenius (1986). The Manager as a Negotiator. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    M. Watkins (1999). “Negotiating in a Complex World,” p. 250.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.W. Salacuse (2003). The Global Negotiator. Making, Managing, and Mending Deals around the World in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan; J.M. Brett, W. Adair, A. Lempereur, T. Okumura, P. Shikhirev, C. Tinsley, and A. Lyttle (1998). “Culture and Joint Gains in Negotiation.” Negotiation Journal, January: 61–85;Google Scholar
  10. J.L. Graham and N.M. Lam (2003). The Chinese Negotiation, October 1, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. R. Kumar (1999). “A Script Theoretical Analysis of International Negotiating Behavior.” In R.J. Bies, R.J. Lewicki, and B.H. Sheppard (Eds.) Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 7, (pp. 285–311). CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    J.L. Graham and Y. Sano (1984). Smart Bargaining: Doing Business with the Japanese. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    J.M. Brett (2000). “Culture and Negotiation.” International Journal of Psychology, 35: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    E.S. Glenn, D. Witmeyer, and K.A. Stevensen (1977). “Cultural Styles of Persuasion.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1: 52–66; Adler. International Dimensions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    J.W. Salacuse (2003). The Global Negotiator, J.M. Brett et al. (1998), “Culture and Joint Gains in Negotiation,” R. Kumar (1999), “A Script Theoretical Analysis.”Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.K. Kozan (1997). “Culture and Conflict Management. A Theoretical Framework.” International Journal of Conflict Management, 8: 338–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Brislin, K. Cushner, C. Cherrie, and M. Young (1986). Intercultural Interactions: A Practical Guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Kumar (1999). “Communicative Conflict in Intercultural Negotiations: The Case of American and Japanese Business Negotiations.” International Negotiation Journal, 4: 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Kumar (2004). “Brahmanical Idealism, Anarchical Individualism, and the Dynamics of Indian Negotiating Behavior.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4: 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 21.
    R. Cohen (1997). Negotiating across Cultures: Communication Obstacles in International Diplomacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    C. Rufin, U.S. Rangan, and R. Kumar (2003). “The Changing Role of the State in the Electricity Industry in India, China, & Brazil: Differences and Explanations.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 62: 649–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 24.
    A.C. Filley (1975). Interpersonal Conflict Resolution. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    J.Z. Rubin, D.G. Pruitt, and S.H. Kim (1994). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  24. 28.
    J. Brockner and B.M. Wiesenfield (1996). “An Integrative Framework, for Explaining Reaction to Decisions.” Psychological Bulletin, 120: 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 29.
    M. Deutsch (1975). “Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will be Used as a Basis for Distributive Justice?” Journal of Social Issues, 31: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 30.
    R. Pillai, E.S. Williams, and J.J. Tan (2001). “Are the Scales Tipped in Favor of Procedural or Distributive Justice? ‘An investigation of, the US, India, Germany, and Hong Kong.’” International Journal of Conflict Management, 12: 312–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 31.
    J.B.P. Sinha and R.N. Kanungo (1997). “Context Sensitivity and Balancing in Indian Organizational Behavior.” International Journal of Psychology, 32: 92–105.Google Scholar
  28. 33.
    R. Kumar (2005). “Contracts and the Dynamics of Exchange Relationships in India.” In R. Ajami, C.E. Arrington, F. Mitchell, and H. Norreklit (Eds.) Globalization, Management Control, and Ideology (pp. 99–111). Copenhagen: Djof Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rajesh Kumar and Anand Kumar Sethi 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajesh Kumar
  • Anand Kumar Sethi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations