Skip to main content

Situating the Militariat

  • Chapter
Coups from Below
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

Primus inter pares within subordinate strata, armed regulars and irregulars have routinely parlayed their guns into means of physical survival, consumption and, in some instances, criminal extraction. Cartesian rationalism may posit a contrary ontology but for the teeming ranks of the militariat in Africa, it is the gun that defines existence, rights, entitlements, and power. Armed subalterns derive a large measure of their self-worth, not to mention political clout, from their weapons. Guns, from this perspective, do not only kill and destroy; they also feed, clothe, house, and enrich those who resort to violence for personal gain. Predicating self-worth on weapons, however, increases the potential for confrontation between armed subalterns and the rest of society. This is because armed marginals, especially when they go on the rampage or during mutinies and coups, frequently act as though their needs and interests supercede those of the rest of society.

I shoot, therefore I am.

—Chidi Amuta

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ali Mazrui, “The Lumpen Proletariat and the Lumpen Militariat: African Soldiers as a New Political Class,” Political Studies, 21 /1 (1973), p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Antonio Gramsci, Selections From the Prison Notebooks (New York: International Publishers, 1971), p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See David Arnold, “Gramsci and Peasant Subalternity in India,” The Journal of Peasant Studies, 11/4, 1984, pp. 155–177, for a superb analysis of subaltern attributes and traits.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alberto Maria Cirese, “Gramsci’s Observations on Folklore,” in A.S. Sasson (ed.), Approaches to Gramsci (London: Writers and Readers, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See D.N. Dhanagare, “Subaltern Consciousness and Populism: Two Approaches in the Study of Social Movements in India,” Social Scientist, 16 /11 (Nov. 1988), pp. 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See James Scott, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  7. James Scott, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goran Hyden, Beyond Ujamma in Tanzania (Berkeley: University of California press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Claus Offe and Helmut Wiesenthal, “Two Logics of Collective Action: Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form,” in M. Zeitlin (ed.), Political Power and Social Theory: A Research Annual, vol. 1 (Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karl Marx and Friederick Engels, Collected Works, vol. 10 (New York: International Publishers, 1978), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frederick Engels, The Peasant War in Germany (New York: International Publishers, 1976), pp. 18, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sam Dolgoff (ed.), Bakunin on Anarchy: Selected Works (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1972), p. 334.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For a comprehensive overview of the historical and conceptual uses of the term lumpen, see Peter Stallybrass, “Marx and Heterogeneity: Thinking the Lumpenproletariat,” Representations, vol. 31, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Vivek Dhareshwar and R. Srivatsan, “Rowdy-Sheeters: An Essay on Subalternity and Politics,” Subaltern Studies, vol. 9 (1996), p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth (New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1963), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Amilcar Cabral, Revolution in Guinea (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid. For a comparative discussion of Cabral and Fanon, see Robert Blackey, “Fanon and Cabral: A Contrast in Theories of Revolution for Africa,” Journal of Modern African Studies 12 /2 (1974), pp. 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. James Scott, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985), p. 335.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robert Fatton, Predatory Rule in Africa (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1992), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson Kasfir (ed.), State and Class in Africa (London: Frank Cass, 1984), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eric Nordlinger, “Soldiers in Mufti,” American Polical Science Review, vol. 64 (1970), p. 1134.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kenneth Noble, “Liberia’s Government Plans to Hold Peace Talks,” New York Times International, 10 June 1990, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eboe Hutchful and Abdoulaye Bathily (eds.), The Military and Militarism in Africa (Dakar: Codesria, 1998), pp. VI–VII.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Henry Bienen, “Populist Military Regimes in West Africa,” Armed Forces and Society, 11 /3 (1985), p. 357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nii K. Bentsi-Enchil, “Notes on the Latest Revolution,” West Africa, July 23 1979, p. 1300.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Basil Davidson, The Black Man’s Burden (New York: Times Books, 1992), pp. 246–247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Jimmy D. Kandeh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kandeh, J.D. (2004). Situating the Militariat. In: Coups from Below. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-7877-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics