Abstract
Most people would agree that, used sparingly and judiciously, public finance yields many social and economic benefits. It has the potential to improve considerably the population’s standard of living, both by fostering national prosperity and sharing it out in a more efficacious manner. However, it cannot be assumed that raising and spending public finance is always solely beneficial. At the very least, private spending has to be given up in order to finance public spending (for example via payment of taxes). In other words, there is a direct opportunity cost associated with public expenditure, namely the private spending that could otherwise have taken place were it not for payment of taxes. If, however, public finance fosters national prosperity (for example through investment in physical and human capital), then this essentially short-term opportunity cost will eventually be offset by greater private sector income (including profits) and wealth in the future.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Agell, J., Lindh, T. and Ohlsson, H. (1997) ‘Growth and the Public Sector: A Critical Review Essay’ European Journal of Political Economy vol. 13, pp. 33–52.
Atkinson, A. B. and Mogensen, G. V. (1993) Welfare and Work Incentives: A North Euro-pean Perspective (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Bailey, S. J. (2002) Public Sector Economics: Theory, Policy and Practice (second edition) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) [Chapters 4 and 5 on disincentive effects and crowding out].
Bhatta, S. D. (2001) ‘Are Inequality and Poverty Harmful for Economic Growth? Evidence from the Metropolitan Areas of the United States’ Journal of Urban Affairs vol. 23, no. 3–4, pp. 335–59.
Bougrine, H. (2000) (editor) The Economics of Public Spending: Debts, Deficits and Economic Performance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Buti, M., Franco, D. and Pench, L. R. (1999) The Welfare State in Europe: Challenges and Reforms (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Creedy, J. (2001) Taxation and Economic Behaviour: Introductory Surveys in Economics, vol. 1 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Daly, M. (1997) ‘Welfare States Under Pressure: Cash Benefits in European Welfare States Over the Last Ten Years’ Journal of European Social Policy vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 129–46.
Gough, I. (1997) ‘Social Assistance in OECD Countries’ Journal of European Social Policy vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–43.
Green, D. G. (1998) Benefit Dependency: How Welfare Undermines Independence (London: Institute of Economic Affairs).
Grimshaw, D. and Rubery, J. (1997) ‘Workforce Heterogeneity and Unemployment Benefits: The Need for Policy Reassessment in the European Union’ Journal of European Social Policy vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 291–318.
Newbery, D. M. G. (1995) (editor) Tax and Benefit Reform in Central and Eastern Europe (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research).
Rowley, C. K., Shughart, W. F. and Tollison, R. D. (2002) (editors) The Economics of Budget Deficits (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Sturm, J. E. (1998) Public Capital Expenditure in OECD Countries: The Causes and Impact of the Decline in Public Capital Spending (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Sturm, R. (1999) Public Deficits: A Comparative Study of their Economic and Political Consequences in Britain, Canada, Germany and the United States (Harlow: Pearson Education).
Sykes, R. and Alcock, P. (1998) (editors) Developments in European Social Policy: Convergence and Diversity (Bristol: Policy Press).
Copyright information
© 2004 Stephen J. Bailey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bailey, S.J. (2004). Beneficial and Adverse Effects of Public Finance. In: Strategic Public Finance. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-4394-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-4394-1_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-92221-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-4394-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)