Abstract
As we have observed in Chapter 2, the fabrication of race is a community matter, one that requires a momentous effort from a significantly varied population. Likewise, the fabrication of race is not intimately connected in a cause and effect manner to the proliferation of colonial conquest and the slave trade, as evidenced by the imperative role played by nations not participating in either matter, namely Germany. And so, the effort seems one that is both pan-European, and practically grounded in the grand empires which she nourished. As suggested in Chapter 2, Europeans were left wondering as to the reason for their growing, global preeminence. For this explanation, they turned to the imagined authority of scientific discourse. Because scientific discourse claims to merit dispassionate distance and objective observation, the legitimacy of its truth-claims are rhetorically imposing. To be sure, the reach and influence of this discourse certainly benefited from the channels, forced or otherwise, of exchange between previously disparate societies. But within this discourse there are competing avenues of authority.
The danger, however, to which he exposes himself cannot deter a man from doing that which he regards as his duty. When a scientific truth has been discovered, he owes it to humanity, and has no right to withhold it. (Nordau [1895] 1968: vii)
Pay no attention to him; he has no common sense: he is all genius. (Anon., quoted in Lombroso [1899] 1911: 33)
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2003 Brian Niro
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Niro, B. (2003). Scientific Authority and Appropriation. In: Race. Transitions. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3778-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3778-0_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-75313-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3778-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)