Abstract
Traditionally, marriage has been seen as the central institution in legitimising and regulating sex in almost all societies. It was regarded not only as the norm for most people but also as a permanent arrangement. Couples were expected to stay together — in good times and in bad, for richer and poorer, in sickness and in health — throughout their lives. Church leaders, politicians and social analysts defended the permanency of marriage by pointing to its economic and psychological benefits for both the individual and society. However, this view of marriage has been increasingly challenged in modern western society. Undermined internally by the sex-role revolution and externally by the rise of non-traditional family living patterns, such as co-habitation and single/never married parenthood, the institution of marriage no longer holds prime position as the best way of defining sexual relationships. Thus, in spite of its positive image in the past, marriage is no longer regarded as either a preferred or permanent way of life by an increasing number of people.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2003 B. C. Hayes and P. M. Prior
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hayes, B.C., Prior, P.M. (2003). Marriage is Good for Health. In: Campling, J. (eds) Gender and Health Care in the United Kingdom. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3760-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3760-5_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-77921-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3760-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)