Skip to main content

Abstract

Traditionally, marriage has been seen as the central institution in legitimising and regulating sex in almost all societies. It was regarded not only as the norm for most people but also as a permanent arrangement. Couples were expected to stay together — in good times and in bad, for richer and poorer, in sickness and in health — throughout their lives. Church leaders, politicians and social analysts defended the permanency of marriage by pointing to its economic and psychological benefits for both the individual and society. However, this view of marriage has been increasingly challenged in modern western society. Undermined internally by the sex-role revolution and externally by the rise of non-traditional family living patterns, such as co-habitation and single/never married parenthood, the institution of marriage no longer holds prime position as the best way of defining sexual relationships. Thus, in spite of its positive image in the past, marriage is no longer regarded as either a preferred or permanent way of life by an increasing number of people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Jo Campling

Copyright information

© 2003 B. C. Hayes and P. M. Prior

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hayes, B.C., Prior, P.M. (2003). Marriage is Good for Health. In: Campling, J. (eds) Gender and Health Care in the United Kingdom. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3760-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3760-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-77921-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3760-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics