Advertisement

Families, Relationships and Home Life

  • Kathryn Gleadle
Chapter
Part of the Social History in Perspective book series (SHP)

Abstract

The years 1860–1900 witnesseda remarkable number of changes in the premises and discourses of family life. Women’s growing access to employment opportunities and increased involvement in philanthropic and political life meant that traditional understandings of gendered roles within marriage were potentially threatened. In this light, the continuing acceptance of traditional structures of family life in most sectors is striking. Nevertheless, women do not appear to have simply acquiescedin patriarchal modes of family life. Middle-class and elite women demonstrated an ability to accommodate their own needs, as well as new ideas concerning relationships, mothering and consumer needs, within conventional formulations of married life and family responsibilities.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    F. M. L. Thompson, The Rise of Respectable Society: A Social History of Victorian Britain, 1830–1900 (London: Fontana Press, 1988), pp. 105–11.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbara Caine, Destined to be Wives: The Sisters of Beatrice Webb (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), p. 92;Google Scholar
  3. Pat Jalland, Women, Marriage and Politics, 1860–1914 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), especially p. 91.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michael Mason, The Making of Victorian Sexuality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elizabeth K. Helsinger, Robin Lauterbach Sheets and William Veeder (eds), The Woman Question: Society and Literature in Britain and America, 1837–1883 (London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983), 3 vols, i, ch. 6;Google Scholar
  6. J. A. Banks and Olive Banks, Feminism and Family Planning in Victorian England (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1964), p. 30.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Jose Harris, Private Lives, Public Spirit: Britain, 1870–1914 (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1994), p. 77.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Carol Dyhouse, Feminism and the Family in England 1880–1939 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989), p. 41.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jane Lewis, Women in England, 1870–1950: Sexual Divisions and Social Change (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1984), p. 120.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    John Tosh, ‘Domesticity and Manliness in the Victorian Middle Class: The Family of Edward White Benson’, in M. Roper and J. Tosh (eds), Manful Assertions: Masculinities in Britain Since 1800 (London: Routledge, 1981), p. 65.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Jessica Gerard, Country House Life: Family and Servants, 1815–1914 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994), p. 102.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    The phrase is Cicely Hamilton’s. See Juliet Gardiner (ed.), The New Woman: Women’s Voices 1880–1918 (London: Collins and Brown, 1993), p. 65.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Leonore Davidoff and Catherine Hall, Family Fortunes: Men and Women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850 (London: Routledge, 1987), pp. 108–13;Google Scholar
  14. Hugh McLeod, Religion and Society in England, 1850–1914 (Basingstoke: Macmillan - now Palgrave 1996), pp. 149–56.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tosh, ‘Domesticity and Manliness’; D. Roberts, ‘The Paterfamilias and the Victorian Governing Class’, in Anthony S. Wohl (ed.), The Victorian Family: Structure and Stresses (London: Croom Helm, 1978), pp. 59–81; Lewis, Women in England p. 125.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin Pugh, The Tories and the People (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985), pp. 45–6.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. James Hammerton, Cruelty and Companionship: Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Married Life (London and New York: Routledge, 1992), chs 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gail Savage, ’“The Wilful Communication of a Loathsome Disease”: Marital Conflict and Venereal Disease in Victorian England’, Victorian Studies, 34 (1990), p. 47.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    M. Jeanne Peterson, Family, Love and Work in the Lives of Victorian Gentlewomen (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1989), p. 169.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Joanna Trollope, Britannia’s Daughters: Women of the British Empire (London: Pimlico, 1994, first published 1983), pp. 48, 130–1.Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    Diana M. Copelman, ‘“’A New Comradeship between Men and Women”: Family, Marriage and London’s Women Teachers, 1870–1914’, in Jane Lewis (ed.), Labour and Love: Women’s Experience of Home and Family, 1850–1940 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986), pp. 175–93.Google Scholar
  22. 27.
    For full details, see Lee Holcombe, Wives and Property: Reform of the Married Women’s Property Law in Nineteenth-Century England (Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press, 1983), ch. 8, pp. 191–3.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    Quoted in Philippa Levine, Victorian Feminism 1850–1900 (London: Hutchinson, 1987), p. 140.Google Scholar
  24. 30.
    Leonore Davidoff, ‘The Family in Britain’, in F. M. L. Thompson (ed.), Cambridge Social History of Britain 1750–1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 3 vols, ii, p. 99.Google Scholar
  25. 31.
    See Erika D. Rappaport, ’“The Halls of Temptation”: Gender, Politics and the Construction of the Department Store in Late Victorian London’, Journal of British Studies 35 (1996), pp. 58–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. and Judith R. Walkowitz, City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late-Victorian London (London: Virago Press, 1992), pp. 46–52. For women and advertising, seeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lori Ann Loeb, Consuming Angels: Advertising and Victorian Women (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    John Belchem, Industrialization and the Working Class: The English Experience, 1750–1900 (London: Scholar Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  29. 33.
    J. A. Banks, Prosperity and Parenthood: A Study of Family Planning Among the Victorian Middle Classes (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1954).Google Scholar
  30. 34.
    Patricia Branca, Silent Sisterhood: Middle-Class Women in the Victorian Home (London: Croom Helm, 1975), ch. 7; Mason, The Making of Victorian Sexuality pp. 57–61;Google Scholar
  31. Angus McLaren, Birth Control in Nineteenth-Century England (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1978);Google Scholar
  32. Daniel Scott Smith, ‘Family Limitation, Sexual Control and Domestic Feminism in Victorian America’, in Mary S. Hartmann and Lois Banner (eds), Clio’s Consciousness Raised: New Perspectives on the History of Women (London: Harper and Row, 1974), pp. 119–36.Google Scholar
  33. 35.
    For an exhaustive discussion of feminist views towards sexuality, see Lucy Bland, Banishing the Beast: English Feminism and Sexual Morality 1885–1914 (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995), especially, ch. 4.Google Scholar
  34. 36.
    Anna Davin, ‘Imperialism and Motherhood’, History Workshop Journal, 5 (1978), pp. 9–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 37.
    Simon Szreter, Fertility, Class and Gender in Britain, 1860–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 40.
    Cited in Pat Jalland and John Hooper (eds), Women from Birth to Death: The Female Life Cycle in Britain 1830–1914 (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1986), p. 276.Google Scholar
  37. 41.
    Pamela Horn, High Society: The English Social Elite, 1880–1914 (Stroud: Alan Sutton, 1992), p. 97.Google Scholar
  38. 48.
    Nupur Chaudhuri, ‘Memsahibs and Motherhood in Nineteenth-Century Colonial India’, Victorian Studies, 31 (1988), pp. 517–35.Google Scholar
  39. 55.
    Deborah Gorham, The Victorian Girl and the Feminine Ideal (London: Croom Helm, 1982);Google Scholar
  40. and Sheila Rowbotham, Good Girls Make Good Wives: Guidance for Girls in Victorian Fiction (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar
  41. 58.
    Lorna Duffin, ‘The Conspicuous Consumptive: Woman as an Invalid’, in Sara Delamont and Lorna Duffin (eds), The Nineteenth-Century Woman: Her Cultural and Physical World (London: Croom Helm, 1978), p. 35.Google Scholar
  42. See also Anne Digby, ‘Women’s Biological Straitjacket’, in Susan Mendus and Jane Rendall (eds), Sexuality and Subordination: Interdisciplinary Studies of Gender in the Nineteenth Century (London: Routledge, 1989), pp. 192–220.Google Scholar
  43. 60.
    Florence Nightingale, Cassandra reprinted in Ray Strachey, The Cause: A Short History of the Women’s Movement in Great Britain (London: Virago, 1978, first published 1928), p. 402.Google Scholar
  44. 62.
    Dominic David Alessio, ‘Domesticating “the Heart of the Wild”: Female Personifications of the Colonies 1886–1940’, Women’s History Review, 6, no. 2 (1997), p. 260.Google Scholar
  45. 66.
    Eileen Janes Yeo, The Contest for Social Science: Relations and Representations of Gender and Class (London: Rivers Oram Press, 1996), pp. 122–4.Google Scholar
  46. Quoted in Bland, Banishing the Beast p. 166 and ch. 6; Sheila Jeffreys, The Spinster and Her Enemies: Feminism and Sexuality 1880–1930 (London: Pandora, 1985), pp. 27–45.Google Scholar
  47. 70.
    Martha Vicinus, Independent Women: Work and Community for Single Women, 1850–1920 (London: Virago, 1985); Bland, Banishing the Beast pp. 168–71.Google Scholar
  48. 71.
    Janet Howarth, ‘Mrs Henry Fawcett (1847–1929): The Widow as a Problem in Feminist Biography’, in June Purvis and Sandra Stanley Holton (eds), Votes for Women (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 84–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kathryn Gleadle 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Gleadle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations