Abstract
The narrative of ‘modernity’ has never been a straightforward one; nor have its multiple origins ever been contained solely within the European body. In seeking to uncover some points of departure for this study of the fictions of the South Asian diaspora in Britain, it is important to recognize from the outset that diasporic histories are often by their very nature discontinuous and frequently involve a doubling of vision, a ‘form of accountability to more than one location’, more than one tradition.5 Furthermore, the spaces opened up by the dominant narrative of a Western modernity have always derived from a process of filtration built on a series of cross-cultural encounters and interconnections, whether staged at ‘home’ or ‘abroad’. For whilst the historic experience of Empire was clearly significant in creating a climate for cultural reconfigurations, the encounter with European philosophical and epistemological systems was only one of many other parallel and indigenous processes influencing the translation and genesis of new literary forms and genres. In the case of the Asian subcontinent, as Nayantara Sahgal implies in the epigraph above, it is difficult to define where ‘one culture begin[s] and another end[s] when they are housed in the same body’. For, if we view the ‘colonial’ as the ‘new Anno Domini from which events are to be everlastingly measured’, we will unfortunately, she says, limit the range of our vision and only ever see one side of the picture. As she goes on to say:
My own awareness as a writer reaches back to x-thousand B.C., at the very end of which measureless time the British came, and stayed, and left. And now they’re gone … their residue is simply one more layer added to the layer upon layer of Indian consciousness. Just one more.6
Only connect
E. M. Forster1
My India I carry with me wheresoever I go
Raja Rao2
I have a soul which … far from being dead is three times livelier than most people’s for I have no less than three native lands which I can call my own
Aubrey Menen3
Where does one culture begin and another end when they are housed in the same person?
Nayantara Sahgal4
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
E. M. Forster, Howards End (London: Arnold, 1910).
Raja Rao, The Serpent and the Rope (London: Murray, 1960).
Aubrey Menen, Dead Man in the Silver Market (London: Chatto & Windus, 1954), p. 118; all further references are to this edition.
R. Radhakrishnan, Diasporic Mediations: Between Home and Location (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), p. xiv.
Antoinette Burton, ‘Making a Spectacle of Empire: Indian Travellers in Finde-Siècle London’, History Workshop Journal, 42, 1996, p. 128.
Zulfikar Ghose, ‘Going Home’, Toronto South Asian Review, 9, 2, 1991, p. 15.
H. J. Booth and N. Rigby, eds, Modernism and Empire. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000), p. 2.
C. L. R. James, The Black Jacobins (London: Secker & Warburg, 1938).
Andrew Gurr, Writers in Exile: The Idenitity of Home in Modern Literature (Brighton: Harvester, 1981), pp. 18–19.
Rosemary Marangoly George, The Politics of Home: Postcolonial Relocations and Twentieth Century Fiction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 2–3.
Meenakshi Mukherjee, The Twice-Born Fiction (New Delhi: Heinemann, 1971).
Aubrey Menen, The Space Within The Heart (London: Hamilton, 1970), p. 88.
Aubrey Menen, The Prevalence of Witches (London: Chatto & Windus, 1947).
Copyright information
© 2002 Susheila Nasta
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nasta, S. (2002). Points of Departure: Early Visions of ‘Home’ and ‘Abroad’. In: Home Truths. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3268-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-3268-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-67006-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-3268-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)