Abstract
Democratisation has been intermittently under way for two centuries, and has a long history. There is nothing unique, or even uniquely inspired, about Britain, though it has been one of the more fortunate and closely-managed experiences. Internationally speaking, democratisation has occurred in several phases. Britain is one of several polities that can be retrospectively located in the first and most extended phase, beginning in the nineteenth century and ‘completing’ in the twentieth. It shared essentially evolutionary experiences, presided over by preexisting elites, with countries in north-west Europe, North America, Australia and, less securely, parts of Southern Europe. Thus far, these have been followed by four equally distinctive and more rapid phases. The first was a largely uncontrolled phase in the inter-war years, particularly amongst autocracies defeated in the First World War and successor-states emerging from the Versailles Settlement. The second occurred immediately after 1945, and comprised right-wing dictatorships defeated in the Second World War, particularly Italy, Germany, Austria and Japan, whose transition was closely supervised by the Western liberal-democratic victors. In the 1970s, there was a third phase in Spain and Portugal, again succeeding right-wing dictatorships. Fourth, and most recently, democratisation has emerged in largely uncontrolled form amongst states surviving or emerging from Communist collapse in Russia and East-Central Europe after 1989. Outside Europe, there have also been recent bouts of democratisation in Africa and Latin America, either from one-party states or from military dictatorships.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
BBC Reith Lectures, quoted Dorothy Pickles, Democracy (1970), p. 11.
Ghia Nodia, ‘How Different are post-Communist Transitions?’, Journal of Democracy, 5, 2 (1994), 15–33.
See, for example, Guiseppe Di Palma, To Craft Democracies: An Essay in Democratic Transition (Berkeley, 1990).
Victor Perez-Diaz, The Return of Civil Society: The Emergence of Democratic Spain (Cambridge, Mass, 1993).
For classic discussion, see Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1833, 1994, edJ.P. Mayer).
For recent discussions, see, amongst many others: Ernest Gellner, Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and its Rivals (1994)
John Kean (ed), Civil Society and the State (1988)
Charles Taylor, ‘Modes of Civil Society’, Public Culture, 3, 1 1990, 95–118
Adam B. Seligman, The Idea of Civil Society (Oxford, 1992)
Edward Shils, ‘The Virtue of Civil Society’, Government and Opposition;, R. D. Putnam, Making Democracy Work:Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, 1993)
Michael Waltzer, ‘The Idea of Civil Society’, Dissent Spring 1991, 293–304
C. G. A Bryant, ‘Citizenship, National Identity and the Accommodation of Difference: Reflections on Contemporary European Examples’, Unpublished paper at European Sociology Association, 1995.
Keith Middlemas, Politics of Industrial Society: The Experience of the British System Since 1911 (1979).
Frank O’ Gorman, Voters, Patrons and Parties: The Unreformed Electorate of Hanoverian England, 1734–1832 (Oxford, 1990).
Quoted Mark Hovell, The Chartist Movement (Manchester, 1918), 69.
Edmund Burke, Works (Bohn’s Standard Library, 1887), vol. 1, 447.
T. H. Marshall, Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays (Cambridge, 1950), 28.
Copyright information
© 2002 John Garrard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garrard, J. (2002). Introduction. In: Democratisation in Britain. British Studies Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1938-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1938-0_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-64640-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1938-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)