Abstract
Dickens’s career as a novelist and journalist took another turn with the collapse of his marriage in 1858, when he severed his long-standing connection with Bradbury and Evans. This firm had printed all of Dickens’s books from Pickwick onwards, and had published all of his novels from the mid-1840s. They were also the publishers of his periodical Household Words. The break came when Bradbury and Evans refused to reprint in Punch (another of their periodical titles) the extraordinary public announcement of his innocence of marital wrongdoing which Dickens had issued in Household Words on 12 June 1858, in an attempt to silence harmful rumours about his personal circumstances, including suggestions that he had left his wife for his sister-in-law, Georgina Hogarth. All the Year Round was launched as the successor to Household Words in April 1859, carrying much the same weekly mix of entertainment, instruction and topical journalism as before. The announcement of the new periodical affirmed its editor’s continuing commitment to ‘that fusion of the graces of the imagination with the realities of life, which is vital to the welfare of any community’.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. M Rignall, ‘Dickens and the Catastrophic Continuum of History in A Tale of Two Cities’, English Literary History, 51 (1984), 575–87
Cates Baldridge, ‘Alternatives to Bourgeois Individualism in A Tale of Two Cities’, Studies in English Literature 30 (1990), 633–54. My own discussion of the novel is particularly indebted to these last two essays.
G. Robert Stange, ‘Expectations Well Lost: Dickens’ Fable for his Time’, College English 16 (1954), 9–17, at p. 10.
Robin Gilmour, The Idea of the Gentleman in the Victorian Novel (London: Arnold, 1981), at p. 135.
Robert Garis, The Dickens Theatre: a Reassessment of the Novels (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965), p. 201.
Hilary Schor, Dickens and the Daughter of the House (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 159.
Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism (London: Chatto and Windus, 1993), p. 52.
Carolyn Brown, ‘Great Expectations: Masculinity and Modernity’, Essays and Studies 40 (1987), 60–74, p. 71.
Mary Poovey, ‘Speculation and Virtue in Our Mutual Friend’, in Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation, 1830–1864 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), pp. 154–81.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985), p. 165.
G. K. Chesterton (ed.), Edwin Drood (London: Dent, 1915), pp. vii-viii.
Laurence Frank, Charles Dickens and the Romantic Self (Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press, 1984), p. 236.
Edmund Wilson, ‘Dickens: the Two Scrooges’, in The Wound and the Bow: Seven Studies in Literature (London: Methuen, 1961 [19411), p. 104.
Angus Wilson, The World of Charles Dickens (London: Secker and Warburg, 1970), p. 291.
Copyright information
© 2002 Lyn Pykett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pykett, L. (2002). These Times of Ours, 1858–70. In: Charles Dickens. Critical Issues. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1919-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1919-9_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-72803-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1919-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)