Abstract
The compulsively repeated writing out of an inexpressible private trauma, or a sustained, ‘graphic and eloquent’ engagement with the social, political and moral realities of his day? These are just two of the myriad ways of reading the formidable literary production of Charles Dickens. To many of his contemporaries Dickens was ‘emphatically the novelist of his age’, in whose novels ‘posterity will read, more clearly than in any contemporary records, the character of our nineteenth century life’.1 At the same time he was also ‘the great magician of our time’, whose ‘wand is a book’.2 By the early twentieth century, Virginia Woolf, who sought in her own modernist experimentation to escape from what she saw as the yoke of the form of the novel created by Dickens and his contemporaries, could take Dickens for granted, as ‘everybody’s writer and no one’s in particular’, an ‘institution, a monument, a public thoroughfare trodden dusty by a million feet’.3 Woolf’s contemporary, John Middleton Murry, on the other hand, found Dickens a challengingly ‘baffling figure’, whose ‘chief purpose in writing’ sometimes appears to be ‘to put a spoke in the wheel of our literary aesthetics’, but one whose work has a ‘curious trick of immortality’ despite the fact that it cannot be contained within accepted canons of value.4 One of Dickens’s most recent re-readers has delighted in the challenge that this author’s work poses to our turn-of-the-twenty-first-century aesthetics, and to the ways in which we usually subdivide the cultural field, and understand the human subject and fictional character, and even the processes of history.5
No words can express the secret agony of my soul as I … felt my early hopes of growing up to be a learned and distinguished man crushed in my breast. The deep remembrance … of the misery it was to my young heart to believe that, day by day, what I had learned and thought, and delighted in, and raised my fancy and emulation up by, was passing away from me … cannot be written.
(Charles Dickens, on his experience of being put to work in Warren’s Blacking Factory at the age of twelve, in ‘Autobiographical Fragment’, Life, I: 22)
[Dickens’s] graphic and eloquent pages have issued to the world more political and social truths than have been uttered by all the professional politicians, publicists, and moralists put together.
(Karl Marx to Friedrich Engels, quoted in Peter Demetz, Marx, Engels and the Poets (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967), p. 45
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Middleton Murry, Pencillings: Little Essays on Literature (London: Collins, 1923), pp. 40–1.
See John Bowen, Other Dickens: Pickwick to Chuzzlewit (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Alexander Welsh, From Copyright to Copperfield (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987), p. 7.
Edward Fitzgerald, Letters of Edward Fitzgerald, ed. J. M. Cohen (London: Centaur Press, 1960), p. 232.
F. R. Leavis and Q. D. Leavis, Dickens the Novelist (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972 [1970]), p. 2.
Wilkie Collins, Rambles beyond Railways (London: Richard Bentley, 1851), included in CH, p. 16.
See Steven Connor (ed.), Charles Dickens (London: Longman, 1996), p. 30. See also Michael Slater, ‘1920–1940: “Superior Folk” and Scandalmongers’, The Dickensian 66 (1970), 121–42.
See Philip Collins, ‘1940–1960: Enter the Professionals’, The Dickensian, 66 (1970), 143–82.
Dorothy Van Ghent, The English Novel: Form and Function (New York: Rhinehart and Winston, 1953), p. 128.
Leslie Stephen, Dictionary of National Biography (London: Smith, Elder, 1883).
F. R. Leavis, The Great Tradition (London: Chatto and Windus, 1948), p. 29.
Edmund Wilson, ‘Dickens: the Two Scrooges’, The Wound and the Bow: Seven Studies in Literature (London: Methuen, 1961 [1941]), p. 45.
Barbara Johnson, The Critical Difference: Essays in the Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980), p. 5.
Raymond Williams, Writing in Society (London: Verso, 1983), p. 203.
Terry Eagleton, Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory (London: Verso, 1976), p. 103.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985), p. 177.
Deirdre David, Rule Britannia: Women, Empire and Victorian Writing (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1995), p. xiii.
See also Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities (London: Verso, 1983)
Homi Bhabha (ed.), Nation and Narration (London: Routledge, 1990).
Charles Baudelaire, The Painter of Modern Life and other Essays trans. and ed. Jonathan Mayne (London: Phaidon, 1964), p. 9. Baudelaire’s essay was written in 1859–60 and published in French in 1863.
Copyright information
© 2002 Lyn Pykett
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pykett, L. (2002). Introduction: the Dickens Phenomenon and the Dickens Industry. In: Charles Dickens. Critical Issues. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1919-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1919-9_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-72803-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1919-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)