Abstract
Postmodern welfare values diversity but, in eschewing meta-narratives, it fragments and individualises society to produce atomised persons, each of whom looks after him or herself. Postmodern theorists argue that it is no longer possible to change society in substantial ways, if doing so relies on having a grand vision that requires meta-level analyses, changing macro-level structures or asking people to organise collectively to undertake change in these arenas. Consequently, providing welfare on an individual basis is inappropriate in an interdependent world, regardless of the tenets of neo-liberalism. In my view, postmodern welfare can be appropriated easily for profit-making by unaccountable entrepreneurs and the vagaries of the market. Postmodern critics of modern welfare states have engendered a sense of despair in people’s capacity to alter their environment, if it is based on dreams that seek to encompass everyone or encourage them to work in solidarity with each other.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2002 Lena Dominelli
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dominelli, L., Campling, J. (2002). Beyond Postmodern Welfare. In: Campling, J. (eds) Anti-Oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1400-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1400-2_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-77155-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-1400-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)