Skip to main content
  • 648 Accesses

Abstract

Identity has been a major arena in which oppressive relationships have been elaborated. This is because identity is intricately bound up with people’s sense of who they are and who others are in relation to themselves. Connected to this is what they look like. Identity formation uses difference to mark one individual or group off from another. These differences can emanate from a number of sources including the physical, psychological and sociological terrains. However, identity differentiation picks up on these differences to distinguish one person or group from the others in an evaluative sense which usually sets one in a binary opposition to another. This allows one trait to be identified as superior or more desirable than another. Thus, differences become politicised by being used to differentiate between people on the basis of a superior-inferior polarity, creating borderlands that can be policed by those on both sides of the binary divide that is established between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Jo Campling

Copyright information

© 2002 Lena Dominelli

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dominelli, L., Campling, J. (2002). Oppression, Social Divisions and Identity. In: Campling, J. (eds) Anti-Oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-1400-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics