Abstract
There is without doubt some justice in the counter-arguments. Lacan has been accused of undue systematicity and a nostalgia for the truth of full speech. Stephen Heath might have difficulty in integrating the unconscious fully into his account of ideology’s production of an imaginary position for the subject. But this need not be the end of the story.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2002 Diane Easthope and Catherine Belsey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Belsey, C. (2002). Conclusion. In: Belsey, C. (eds) Privileging Difference. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-0704-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-0704-2_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-78629-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-0704-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)