Skip to main content

Abstract

Critical theory instituted a continuous demand to retheorise from the ground up. In Sexual Dissidence (1991) Jonathan Dollimore rethinks the traditional social and religious condemnation — and often brutal persecution — of homosexuality and, particular in Dollimore’s concern, male same-sex activity, as what he terms ‘the perverse dynamic’ (the equation between homosexuality and perversion is his). I will have to ask later what this new theorisation can do which we could not do already. For the basic effect of the perverse dynamic is already familiar as the psychoanalytic mechanism of projection and displacement. Dollimore quotes James Baldwin as saying, ‘Straight cats invent faggots so they can sleep with them without becoming faggots themselves’ (cited 1991: 219). Desire denied in one subject is projected onto another object, who can then be held responsible for its origin, promotion and very existence. Unconsciously, of course, this would not take place unless the straight cats were not as straight as they thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Catherine Belsey

Copyright information

© 2002 Diane Easthope and Catherine Belsey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belsey, C. (2002). Dollimore. In: Belsey, C. (eds) Privileging Difference. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-0704-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4039-0704-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-78629-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4039-0704-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics