Causation and Its Discontents

Part of the The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis book series (PSDE, volume 23)

It is impossible to escape the impression that population scientists commonly use false standards in adducing causation – that they seek to make claims about the power of their research in elucidating cause and effect and admire similar claims in others, and that they mis-estimate the true values of important causal parameters. And yet, in making any general judgment of this sort, we are in danger of forgetting how variegated the human population and the mental constructs associated with its apprehension are.


Migration Smoke Posit Paral Lost 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allison, P.D. (2005). Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS ®. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Angrist, J.D., G.W. Imbens and D.B. Rubin (1996). Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(434): 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachrach, C. and G. McNicoll (2003). Introduction [to Causal Analysis in the Population Sciences: A Symposium. Population and Development Review 29(3): 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk, R.A., K.J. Lenihan and P.H. Rossi (1980). Crime and Poverty: Some Experimental Evidence from Ex-Offenders. American Sociological Review 45(5): 766–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berk, R.A. (2004). Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Caldwell, J.C. (1996). Demography and Social Science. Population Studies 50(3): 305–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caldwell, J.C., P.H. Reddy and P. Caldwell (1988). The Causes of Demographic Change: Experimental Research in South India. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, D.T. and J.C. Stanley (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  9. Coale, A. and J. Trussell (1996). The Development and Use of Demographic Models. Population Studies 50(3): 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coser, L.A. (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crimmins, E.M. (1993). Demography: The Past Thirty Years, the Present, and the Future. Demography 30(4): 579–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan, O.D. (1975). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, O.D., D.L. Feathernan and B. Duncan (1972). Socioeconomic Background and Achievement. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  14. Frangakis, C.E. (2004). Principal Stratification. In: Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives: An Essential Journey with Donald Rubin’s Statistical Family, eds. Andrew Gelman and Xiao-Li Meng. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Frangakis, C.E. and Donald B. Rubin (2002). Principal Stratification in Causal Inference. Biometrics 58(1): 21–29.Google Scholar
  16. Freedman, D. (1987). As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics12(2): 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freud, S. (1961). Civilization and Its Discontents. Translated and edited by James Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Gelman, A. and X.-L. Meng (eds.) (2004). Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives: An Essential Journey with Donald Rubin’s Statistical Family. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Gennetian, L.A., P.A. Morris, J.M. Bos and H.S. Bloom (2005). Constructing Instrumental Variables from Experimental Data to Explore How Treatments Produce Effects. In: Learning More from Social Experiments, ed. Howard S. Bloom. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Gieryn, T.F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heckman, J.J. (2001). Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture. Journal of Political Economy 109(4): 673–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckman, J.J. (2005a). The Scientific Model of Causality. In: Sociological Methodology 2005, ed. Ross M. Stolzenberg. Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Heckman, J.J. (2005b). Rejoinder: Response to Sobel. In: Sociological Methodology 2005, ed. Ross M. Stolzenberg. Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Holland, P.W. (1986). Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81(396): 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahn, J.R. and W.M. Mason. (1987). Political Alienation, Cohort Size, and the Easterlin Hypothesis. American Sociological Review 52(1): 155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keyfitz, N. (1977). What Difference Would It Make if Cancer Were Eradicated? An Examination of the Taeuber Paradox. Demography 14(4): 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keyfitz, N. and G.S. Littman (1979). Mortality in a Heterogeneous Population. Population Studies 33(2): 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kish, L. (1987). Statistical Design for Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manton, K.G. and S.S. Poss (1979). Effects of Dependency Among Causes of Death for Cause Elimination Life Table Strategies. Demography 16(2): 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marx, K. and F. Engels (1976) [1888, 1848]. Manifesto of the Communist Party, pp. 476–519 in their Collected Works, Volume 6, translated by Samuel Moore. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Mason, K.O., W.M. Mason, H.H. Winsborough and W.K. Poole (1973). Some Methodological Issues in Cohort Analysis of Archival Data. American Sociological Review 38(2): 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moffitt, R. (2003). Causal Analysis in Population Research: An Economist’s Perspective. Population and Development Review 29(3): 448–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moffitt, R. (2005). Remarks on the Analysis of Causal Relationships in Population Research. Demography 42(1): 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moffitt, R. (2009). Issues in the Estimation of Causal Effects in Population Research, with an Application to the Effects of Teenage Childbearing. In: Causal Analysis in Population Studies: Concepts, Methods, Applications, eds. H. Engelhardt, A. Prskawetz and H.-P. Kohler. Ort: Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Morgan, S.P. and S.M. Lynch (2001). Success and Future of Demography: The Role of Data and Methods. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 954: 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morgan, S.L. and C. Winship (2007). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Namboodiri, K. (1991). Demographic Analysis: A Stochastic Approach. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  38. NìBhrolcháin, M. and T. Dyson (2007). On Causation in Demography: Issues and Illustrations. Population and Development Review 33(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Preston, S.H. (1993). The Contours of Demography: Estimates and Projections. Demography 30(4): 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Preston, S.H., P. Heuveline and M. Guillot (2001). Demography: Measuring and Modeling Popuiation Processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Rossi, P.H., R.A. Berk and K.J. Lenihan (1980). Money, Work, and Crime: Experimental Evidence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rossi, P.H., R.A. Berk and K.J. Lenihan (1982). Saying It Wrong with Figures: A Comment on Zeisel. American Journal of Sociology 88(2): 390–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rubin, D.B. (1974). Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 66(5): 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubin, D.B. (1990). Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies. Statistical Science 5(4): 472–480.Google Scholar
  46. Rubin, D.B. (2004). Direct and Indirect Causal Effects via Potential Outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 31(2): 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, H.L. (1990). Specification Problems in Experimental and Nonexperimental Social Research. In: Sociological Methodology 1990, ed. Clifford C. Clogg. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, H.L. (1997). Matching with Multiple Controls to Estimate Treatment Effects in Observational Studies. In: Sociological Methodology 1997, ed. Adrian E. Raftery. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, H.L. (2003). Some Thoughts on Causation as It Relates to Demography and Population Studies. Population and Development Review 29(3): 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, H.L. (2005). Introducing New Contraceptives in Rural China: A Field Experiment. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 599: 246–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, H.L. (2008). Advances in Age-Period-Cohort Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research 36(3): 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sobel, M.E. (2005). Discussion: ‘The Scientific Model of Causality’. In: Sociological Methodology 2005, ed. R.M. Stolzenberg. Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Vaupel, J.W., K.G. Manton and E. Stallard (1979). The Impact of Heterogeneity in Individual Frailty on the Dynamics of Mortality. Demography 16(3): 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Webster, R. (1995). Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  55. Winship, C. and D.J. Harding (2008). A Mechanism-Based Approach to the Identification of Age–Period–Cohort Models. Sociological Methods & Research 36(3): 362–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winship, C. and S.L. Morgan (1999). The Estimation of Causal Effects from Observational Data. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 659–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Winship, C. and M. Sobel (2004). Causal Inference in Sociological Studies. In: Handbook of Data Analysis, eds. M.A. Hardy and A. Bryman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  58. Zeisel, H. (1982a). Disagreement over the Evaluation of a Controlled Experiment. American Journal of Sociology 88(2): 378–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zeisel, H. (1982b). Hans Zeisel Concludes the Debate. American Journal of Sociology 88(2): 394–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Population Studies Center, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations