Abstract
Taking the debate about convergent versus divergent crystallations of modernity as its point of departure, the chapter argues that the question as to whether modernization results in similar forms of societal organization anywhere or instead manifests itself in rather heterogeneous social systems cannot be answered by purely empirical means, because the weight accorded particular kinds of diversity depends on the vantage point from which they are viewed. Viewed from the vantage point of a differentiation theoretical conception of modernity, the differences highlighted by the multiple modernities school, while doubtless real, appear relatively unimportant. At the same time, equally real differences that are highly relevant from a differentiation theoretical perspective, are largely ignored in the multiple modernities literature. Reconstructing global modernization effects during the past half century, a comparison between East Asian and Western modernity, the currently most advanced exemplars of modernity, yields little noteworthy difference. The chapter ends with e few speculative remarks about the implications of ongoing global modernization for sustainability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The next most developed countries in (South-)East Asia are Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia, followed by Thailand and, increasingly China. Other countries that might qualify as candidates for full modernity already or that appear to be making steady progress toward reaching it soon would be Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and Costa Rica in Latin America, the United Arab Emirates and several of its neighbours in the gulf region of the Middle East, South Africa and Botwana in sub-Saharan Africa, perhaps Russia, and various other countries elsewhere in the world.
References
Allardt, E. (2005). Europe’s multiple modernity. In E. Ben-Rafael, & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Comparing modernities: Pluralism versus homogeneity (pp. 483–499). Leiden: Brill.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bendix, R. (1977). Nation-building & citizenship: Studies of our changing order. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Berkovitch, N. (1999). From motherhood to citizenship: Women’s rights and international organizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Caldwell, J. C. (1993). The Asian fertility revolution: Its implications for transition theories. In R. Leete, & I. Alam (Eds.), The revolution in Asian fertility (pp. 299–316). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Crone, P. (1989). Pre-industrial societies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Durkheim, E. (1949). The division of labour in society. New York: Free Press.
Easterlin, R. A. (2000). The worldwide standard of living since 1800. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 7–26.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2006). Foresight 2020. Economy, Industry and Corporate Trends. http://graphics.eiu.com/files/ad_pdfs/eiuForesight2020_WP.pdf.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000a). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129, 1–29.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000b). Die Vielfalt der Moderne. Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2005). Collective identity and the constructive and destructive forces of modernity. In E. Ben-Rafael, & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Comparing modernities: Pluralism versus homogeneity (pp. 635–653). Brill: Leiden.
Firebaugh, G. (2003). The new geography of global inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gill, I., & Homi, K. (2007). An East Asian renaissance: Ideas for economic growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Hobsbawm, E. (1994). The age of extremes: A history of the world, 1914–1991. New York: Vintage.
Huntington, S. P. (1971). The change to change: Modernization, development, and politics. Comparative Politics, 3, 283–322.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ILO. (2006). Highlights of Current Labour Market Trends. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/strat/kilm/trends.htm.
Kaufmann, D., Kray, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Governance matters VI: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2006. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4280, July 2007. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Kumar, K. (1999). Modernization and Industrialization. In M. Waters (Ed.), Modernity. critical concepts, volume 1: Modernization (pp. 72–104). London: Routledge.
Kutznets, S. (1973). Modern economic growth: Findings and reflections. American Economic Review, 63, 247–258.
Landes, D. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations. New York: Norton.
Lerner, D. (1968). Modernization. In D. L. Sills, & R. K. Merton (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 386–395). New York: Macmillan.
Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (2000). Answering the question: What is modernity? An interview with niklas luhmann. In W. Rasch (Ed.), Niklas Luhmann’s modernity: The paradoxes of differentiation (pp. 195–221). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the world economy 1820–1992. Paris: OECD.
Mahbubani, K. (2008). The New Asian hemisphere: The irresistible shift of global power to the East. New York: Public Affairs.
McNicoll, G. (1991). Changing patterns and fertility policies in the third world. Working Papers in Demography No. 32, Canberra: Australian National University.
Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Soysal, Y. N. (1992). World expansion of mass education, 1870–1980. Sociology of Education, 65, 128–149.
Nazir, S. (2005). Challenging inequality. Obstacles and opportunities towards women’s rights in the middle East and North Africa. In S. Nazir, & L. Tomppert (Eds.), Women’s rights in the middle East and North Africa: Citizenship and justice (pp. 1–14). New York: Freedom House.
OECD. (2007). Education at a glance 2007. Paris: OECD.
Offe, C. (1987). The utopia of the zero option: Modernity and modernization as normative political criteria. Praxis International, 7, 1–24.
Parsons, T. (1964). Evolutionary universals in society. American Sociological Review, 29, 339–357.
Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Schmidt, V. H. (2008a). Limits to growth? China’s rise and its implications for europe. In K. Siegbert Rehberg (Ed.), Die Natur der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Campus.
Schmidt, V. H. (2008b). Convergence with a twist: East Asian welfare capitalism in comparative perspective. In L. K. Fee & T. C. Kiong (Eds.), Social policy in post-industrial Singapore (pp. 309–331). Leiden: Brill.
Shah, G., Harsh M., Sukhadeo T., Satish D., & Baviskar, A. (2006). Untouchability in rural India. New Delhi: Sage.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University. (2007). Academic Ranking of World Universities – 2007. http://www.arwu.org/rank/2007/ranking2007.htm.
Smelser, N. J. (1968). Toward a theory of modernization. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Essays in sociological explanation (pp 125–146). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Therborn, G. (2003). Entangled modernities. European Journal of Social Theory, 6, 293–305.
Titmuss, R. M. (1966). Essays on the welfare state. London: Unwin Press.
Tu, W. (2000). Implications of the rise of ‘Confucian’ East Asia. Daedalus, 129, 195–218.
UNDP. (2006). Human development report 2006: Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
UNICEF. (2006). The state of the world’s children 2007: Women and children. The double dividend of gender equality. New York: UNICEF.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world system I. New York: Academic Press.
Weber, M. (1978). Gesammelte Aufsaetze zur Religionssoziologie. Volume 1 (7th ed.). Tuebingen: Mohr.
Weber, M. (1984). Die protestantische Ethik I. Eine Aufsatzsammlung (7th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.
Wittrock, B. (2000). Modernity: One, none, or many? European origins and modernity as a global condition. Daedalus, 129, 31–60.
Wittrock, B. (2005). Cultural crystallization and civilizational change: Axiality and modernity. In E. Ben-Rafael, & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Comparing modernities: pluralism versus homogeneity (pp. 83–123). Brill: Leiden
World Economic Forum. (2007). The global competitiveness report 2007–2008. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
World Health Organization. (2000). World health report 2000: Health systems: Improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Trade Organization. (2007). World trade report 2007: Six decades of multilateral trade cooperation: What have we learned? Geneva: World Trade Organization.
Worldwatch Institute. (2004). State of the world 2004: Progress towards a sustainable society. London: Earthscan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmidt, V.H. (2009). Convergence and Divergence in Societal Modernization: Global trends, Regional Variations, and Some Implications for Sustainability. In: Meier, L., Lange, H. (eds) The New Middle Classes. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9938-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9938-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9937-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9938-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)