Skip to main content

Convergence and Divergence in Societal Modernization: Global trends, Regional Variations, and Some Implications for Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The New Middle Classes

Abstract

Taking the debate about convergent versus divergent crystallations of modernity as its point of departure, the chapter argues that the question as to whether modernization results in similar forms of societal organization anywhere or instead manifests itself in rather heterogeneous social systems cannot be answered by purely empirical means, because the weight accorded particular kinds of diversity depends on the vantage point from which they are viewed. Viewed from the vantage point of a differentiation theoretical conception of modernity, the differences highlighted by the multiple modernities school, while doubtless real, appear relatively unimportant. At the same time, equally real differences that are highly relevant from a differentiation theoretical perspective, are largely ignored in the multiple modernities literature. Reconstructing global modernization effects during the past half century, a comparison between East Asian and Western modernity, the currently most advanced exemplars of modernity, yields little noteworthy difference. The chapter ends with e few speculative remarks about the implications of ongoing global modernization for sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The next most developed countries in (South-)East Asia are Brunei Darussalam and Malaysia, followed by Thailand and, increasingly China. Other countries that might qualify as candidates for full modernity already or that appear to be making steady progress toward reaching it soon would be Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and Costa Rica in Latin America, the United Arab Emirates and several of its neighbours in the gulf region of the Middle East, South Africa and Botwana in sub-Saharan Africa, perhaps Russia, and various other countries elsewhere in the world.

References

  • Allardt, E. (2005). Europe’s multiple modernity. In E. Ben-Rafael, & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Comparing modernities: Pluralism versus homogeneity (pp. 483–499). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. (1977). Nation-building & citizenship: Studies of our changing order. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitch, N. (1999). From motherhood to citizenship: Women’s rights and international organizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (1993). The Asian fertility revolution: Its implications for transition theories. In R. Leete, & I. Alam (Eds.), The revolution in Asian fertility (pp. 299–316). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, P. (1989). Pre-industrial societies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1949). The division of labour in society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2000). The worldwide standard of living since 1800. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2006). Foresight 2020. Economy, Industry and Corporate Trends. http://graphics.eiu.com/files/ad_pdfs/eiuForesight2020_WP.pdf.

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000a). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000b). Die Vielfalt der Moderne. Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (2005). Collective identity and the constructive and destructive forces of modernity. In E. Ben-Rafael, & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Comparing modernities: Pluralism versus homogeneity (pp. 635–653). Brill: Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, G. (2003). The new geography of global inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, I., & Homi, K. (2007). An East Asian renaissance: Ideas for economic growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1994). The age of extremes: A history of the world, 1914–1991. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1971). The change to change: Modernization, development, and politics. Comparative Politics, 3, 283–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2006). Highlights of Current Labour Market Trends. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/strat/kilm/trends.htm.

  • Kaufmann, D., Kray, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Governance matters VI: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2006. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4280, July 2007. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (1999). Modernization and Industrialization. In M. Waters (Ed.), Modernity. critical concepts, volume 1: Modernization (pp. 72–104). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutznets, S. (1973). Modern economic growth: Findings and reflections. American Economic Review, 63, 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D. (1968). Modernization. In D. L. Sills, & R. K. Merton (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 386–395). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2000). Answering the question: What is modernity? An interview with niklas luhmann. In W. Rasch (Ed.), Niklas Luhmann’s modernity: The paradoxes of differentiation (pp. 195–221). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the world economy 1820–1992. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, K. (2008). The New Asian hemisphere: The irresistible shift of global power to the East. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicoll, G. (1991). Changing patterns and fertility policies in the third world. Working Papers in Demography No. 32, Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., & Soysal, Y. N. (1992). World expansion of mass education, 1870–1980. Sociology of Education, 65, 128–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazir, S. (2005). Challenging inequality. Obstacles and opportunities towards women’s rights in the middle East and North Africa. In S. Nazir, & L. Tomppert (Eds.), Women’s rights in the middle East and North Africa: Citizenship and justice (pp. 1–14). New York: Freedom House.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Education at a glance 2007. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1987). The utopia of the zero option: Modernity and modernization as normative political criteria. Praxis International, 7, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1964). Evolutionary universals in society. American Sociological Review, 29, 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. H. (2008a). Limits to growth? China’s rise and its implications for europe. In K. Siegbert Rehberg (Ed.), Die Natur der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. H. (2008b). Convergence with a twist: East Asian welfare capitalism in comparative perspective. In L. K. Fee & T. C. Kiong (Eds.), Social policy in post-industrial Singapore (pp. 309–331). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, G., Harsh M., Sukhadeo T., Satish D., & Baviskar, A. (2006). Untouchability in rural India. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University. (2007). Academic Ranking of World Universities – 2007. http://www.arwu.org/rank/2007/ranking2007.htm.

  • Smelser, N. J. (1968). Toward a theory of modernization. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Essays in sociological explanation (pp 125–146). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (2003). Entangled modernities. European Journal of Social Theory, 6, 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, R. M. (1966). Essays on the welfare state. London: Unwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W. (2000). Implications of the rise of ‘Confucian’ East Asia. Daedalus, 129, 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2006). Human development report 2006: Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2006). The state of the world’s children 2007: Women and children. The double dividend of gender equality. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world system I. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Gesammelte Aufsaetze zur Religionssoziologie. Volume 1 (7th ed.). Tuebingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1984). Die protestantische Ethik I. Eine Aufsatzsammlung (7th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, B. (2000). Modernity: One, none, or many? European origins and modernity as a global condition. Daedalus, 129, 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, B. (2005). Cultural crystallization and civilizational change: Axiality and modernity. In E. Ben-Rafael, & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Comparing modernities: pluralism versus homogeneity (pp. 83–123). Brill: Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2007). The global competitiveness report 2007–2008. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2000). World health report 2000: Health systems: Improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2007). World trade report 2007: Six decades of multilateral trade cooperation: What have we learned? Geneva: World Trade Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute. (2004). State of the world 2004: Progress towards a sustainable society. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker H. Schmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmidt, V.H. (2009). Convergence and Divergence in Societal Modernization: Global trends, Regional Variations, and Some Implications for Sustainability. In: Meier, L., Lange, H. (eds) The New Middle Classes. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9938-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics