Skip to main content

Models of Competence and Opportunities to Learn in Schools

  • Chapter
Linking Competence to Opportunities to Learn

Part of the book series: Innovations in Science Education and Technology ((ISET,volume 17))

  • 547 Accesses

The NAEP survey collects information on a wide range of variables pertaining to schools. These variables represent opportunities to learn due to such school aspects as student grouping (by ability, math, reading, etc.), school curriculum emphasis and priority (science, art, etc.), frequencies of science instruction, computer availability, curricula, frequency of field trips, library staffing, parent participation, student behavior, teacher morale, and so on. Table 5.1 presents sample questions from the NAEP school background questionnaire and variables created based on them; a complete list of the variables is available in Appendix C.

When students are in schools, they are placed in individual classrooms. However, individual classrooms exist within a school context. A school as a unit has its own culture that affords various opportunities to learn. This varying effect of school culture on student learning has been called hidden curricula or implicit curricula as compared to explicitly stated curricula implemented in classrooms (Cornbleth, 1984). “In school, students seem to learn much that is not publicly set forth in official statements of school philosophy or purpose or in course guides and syllabi. … Implicit curricula consist of the messages imparted by the classroom and school environment” (Cornbleth, 1984, p. 29). Implicit curricula in schools convey a variety of messages, sometimes contradictory to each other. It is up to individual students to make sense of them. Besides school curricula that may be formal, informal, or hidden, schools impact students through their organization (staffing plans, physical organization, etc.) and curriculum orientations (traditional, constructivist, and personal relevance) (Barbour & Barbour, 1997). Schools can differ greatly in terms of their educational policies, and such between-school differences are particularly evident in the United States in which education is overall decentralized in terms of governance, curriculum, and testing (Burstein et al., 1980).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Models of Competence and Opportunities to Learn in Schools. In: Liu, X. (eds) Linking Competence to Opportunities to Learn. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9911-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics