Advertisement

Derivative Dispositions and Multiple Generative Levels

  • Ian J. ThompsonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 347)

Abstracts

The analysis of dispositions is used to consider cases where the effect of one disposition operating is the existence of another disposition. This may arise from rearrangements within aggregated structures of dispositional parts, or, it is argued, also as what I will call stages of ‘derivative dispositions’ within a set of ‘multiple generative levels’. Inspection of examples in both classical and quantum physics suggests a more general way of looking at these phenomena, as if there is a universal principle of ‘conditional forward causation’: that dispositions act between the levels in a way conditional on certain circumstances or occasions already existing at the ‘later’ levels.

Keywords

Wave Function Causal Power Hamiltonian Operator Dispositional Property Simple Disposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1969), Dispositions are causes, Analysis 30, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird, A. J. (2004), The dispositionalist conception of laws, Foundations of Science 152, 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Brightwell, G Dowker, F., García, R. S., Henson, J., and Sorkin, R. D. (2003), Observables in causal set cosmology, Physical Review D 67, 084031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broad, C. D. (1925), Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakravartty, A. (2003), The dispositional essentialist view of properties and law, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11, 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, D. (1967), Causal relations, Journal of Philosophy 64, 691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elder, C. L. (1994), Laws, natures, and contingent necessities, Philosphy and Phenomenological Research 54, 649–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis, B. (2000), Causal laws and singular causation, Philosphy and Phenomenological Research 61, 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis, B. (2001), Scientific Essentialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, B. and Lierse, C. (1994). Dispositional essentialism, Australian Journal of Philosophy 72, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emmet, D. (1984), The Effectiveness of Causes, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fetzer. J. H. (1977), A world of dispositions, Synthese 34, 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katzav, J. (2004), Dispositions and the principle of least action, Analysis 64, 206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krause, D. (2005), Separability and Non-Individuality: Is it possible to conciliate (at least a form of) Einstein’s realism with quantum mechanics? PhilSci-Archive, URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002431/. Accessed 5 Jan 2007.
  16. Harre, R. and Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lange, M. (2005), How can instantaneous velocity fulfill its causal role? Philosophical Review 114, 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKitrick, J. (2003), The bare metaphysical possibility of bare dispositions, Philosphy and Phenomenological Research 66, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meschini, D., Lehto, M., Piilonen, J. (2005). Geometry, pregeometry and beyond, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36, 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Molnar, G. (2004), Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mumford, S. (1995), Ellis and Lierse on dispositional essentialism, Australian Journal of Philosophy 73, 606–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mumford, S. (1998), Dispositions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mumford, S. (2005), Laws and Lawlessness, Synthese 144, 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Penrose, R. (1987), Spinors and Space-Time: Volume 1, Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Psillos, S. (2006), What do Powers do when they are not Manifested? Philosphy and Phenomenological Research 72, 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rovelli, C. (1998), Loop Quantum Gravity, Living Reviews of Relativity 1: 1. URL: http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-1.
  27. Ryle, G. (1949), The Concept of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Shoemaker, S. (1984), Identity, Cause, and Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2nd ed., 2003).Google Scholar
  29. Stachel, J. (2005), Structure, individuality and quantum gravity, In D. P. Rickles, French, S. R. D., and Saatsi, J (eds.) Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–82.Google Scholar
  30. Steiner, M. (1986), Events and Causality, Journal of Philosophy 83, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Swoyer, C. (1982), The Nature of Natural Laws, Australian Journal of Philosophy 60, 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson, I. J. (1988), Real dispositions in the physical world, British Journal Philosophical Science 39, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lawrence Livermore LaboratoryLivermoreUSA

Personalised recommendations