Abstracts
The analysis of dispositions is used to consider cases where the effect of one disposition operating is the existence of another disposition. This may arise from rearrangements within aggregated structures of dispositional parts, or, it is argued, also as what I will call stages of ‘derivative dispositions’ within a set of ‘multiple generative levels’. Inspection of examples in both classical and quantum physics suggests a more general way of looking at these phenomena, as if there is a universal principle of ‘conditional forward causation’: that dispositions act between the levels in a way conditional on certain circumstances or occasions already existing at the ‘later’ levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Armstrong, D. M. (1969), Dispositions are causes, Analysis 30, 23–26.
Bird, A. J. (2004), The dispositionalist conception of laws, Foundations of Science 152, 1–18.
Brightwell, G Dowker, F., García, R. S., Henson, J., and Sorkin, R. D. (2003), Observables in causal set cosmology, Physical Review D 67, 084031.
Broad, C. D. (1925), Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Chakravartty, A. (2003), The dispositional essentialist view of properties and law, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11, 393–413.
Davidson, D. (1967), Causal relations, Journal of Philosophy 64, 691–703.
Elder, C. L. (1994), Laws, natures, and contingent necessities, Philosphy and Phenomenological Research 54, 649–67.
Ellis, B. (2000), Causal laws and singular causation, Philosphy and Phenomenological Research 61, 329–351.
Ellis, B. (2001), Scientific Essentialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, B. and Lierse, C. (1994). Dispositional essentialism, Australian Journal of Philosophy 72, 27–45.
Emmet, D. (1984), The Effectiveness of Causes, New York: State University of New York Press.
Fetzer. J. H. (1977), A world of dispositions, Synthese 34, 397–421.
Katzav, J. (2004), Dispositions and the principle of least action, Analysis 64, 206–214.
Krause, D. (2005), Separability and Non-Individuality: Is it possible to conciliate (at least a form of) Einstein’s realism with quantum mechanics? PhilSci-Archive, URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002431/. Accessed 5 Jan 2007.
Harre, R. and Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lange, M. (2005), How can instantaneous velocity fulfill its causal role? Philosophical Review 114, 433–468.
McKitrick, J. (2003), The bare metaphysical possibility of bare dispositions, Philosphy and Phenomenological Research 66, 349–369.
Meschini, D., Lehto, M., Piilonen, J. (2005). Geometry, pregeometry and beyond, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36, 435–464.
Molnar, G. (2004), Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mumford, S. (1995), Ellis and Lierse on dispositional essentialism, Australian Journal of Philosophy 73, 606–12.
Mumford, S. (1998), Dispositions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mumford, S. (2005), Laws and Lawlessness, Synthese 144, 397–413.
Penrose, R. (1987), Spinors and Space-Time: Volume 1, Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Psillos, S. (2006), What do Powers do when they are not Manifested? Philosphy and Phenomenological Research 72, 137–156.
Rovelli, C. (1998), Loop Quantum Gravity, Living Reviews of Relativity 1: 1. URL: http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-1.
Ryle, G. (1949), The Concept of Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shoemaker, S. (1984), Identity, Cause, and Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2nd ed., 2003).
Stachel, J. (2005), Structure, individuality and quantum gravity, In D. P. Rickles, French, S. R. D., and Saatsi, J (eds.) Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 53–82.
Steiner, M. (1986), Events and Causality, Journal of Philosophy 83, 249–264.
Swoyer, C. (1982), The Nature of Natural Laws, Australian Journal of Philosophy 60, 203–223.
Thompson, I. J. (1988), Real dispositions in the physical world, British Journal Philosophical Science 39, 67–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, I.J. (2011). Derivative Dispositions and Multiple Generative Levels. In: Suárez, M. (eds) Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics. Synthese Library, vol 347. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9904-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9904-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9903-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9904-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)