Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics pp 221-243 | Cite as

# Is the Quantum World Composed of Propensitons?

## Abstract

In this paper I outline my propensiton version of quantum theory (PQT). PQT is a fully micro-realistic version of quantum theory that provides us with a very natural possible solution to the fundamental wave/particle problem, and is free of the severe defects of orthodox quantum theory (OQT) as a result. PQT makes sense of the quantum world. PQT recovers all the empirical success of OQT and is, furthermore, empirically testable (although not as yet tested). I argue that Einstein almost put forward this version of quantum theory in 1916/1917 in his papers on spontaneous and induced radiative transitions, but retreated from doing so because he disliked the probabilistic character of the idea. Subsequently, the idea was overlooked because debates about quantum theory polarised into the Bohr/Heisenberg camp, which argued for the abandonment of realism and determinism, and the Einstein/Schrödinger camp, which argued for the retention of realism and determinism, no one, as a result, pursuing the most obvious option of retaining realism but abandoning determinism. It is this third, overlooked option that leads to PQT. PQT has implications for quantum field theory, the standard model, string theory, and cosmology. The really important point, however, is that it is experimentally testable. I indicate two experiments in principle capable of deciding between PQT and OQT.

## Keywords

Quantum Theory Quantum System Physical Space Classical Physic Probabilistic Character## References

- Albert, D. Z. (1996), Elementary quantum metaphysics, In J. Cushing, Fine, A., and Goldstein S. (eds.),
*Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory*. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 277–284.Google Scholar - Bell, J. S. (1987),
*Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Bohr, N. (1949), Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics, In P. A. Schilpp, (ed.),
*Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist*. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 199–241.Google Scholar - Born, M. (1927),
*Nature*119, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Born, M. (1971),
*The Born-Einstein Letters*. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Einstein, A. (1950), Letter to Schrödinger, In K. Przibram (ed.),
*Letters on Wave Mechanics.*Philosophical Library: New York, NY, pp. 39–40.Google Scholar - Fleming, G. (1989), Lorentz-Invariant state reduction and localization. In A. Fine and Forbes, M. (eds.),
*Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988*. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2.Google Scholar - Fonda, L., Ghirardi, G. C., and Rimini, A. (1978), Decay theory of unstable systems,
*Reports on Progress in Physics*41, 587–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ghirardi, G. C. (2002), Collapse theories, in stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, available online at http://plato.stanford.edu/achives/ spr2002/ entries/qm-collapse. Accessed 18 Sept 2010.
- Ghirardi, G. C., Rimini, A., and Weber, T. (1986), Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems,
*Physical Review D,*34*,*470–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jammer, M. (1966)
*The Conceptual Development of Quantum Theory*, New York : McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar - Margenau, H. (1958), Philosophical problems concerning the meaning of measurement in physics.
*Philosophy of Science*25, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Margenau, H. (1963), Measurements and quantum states: Part I.
*Philosophy of Science*30, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1968), Can there be Necessary Connections between Successive Events?,
*British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*19, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1972), A new look at the quantum mechanical problem of measurement,
*American Journal of Physics*40, 1431–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1973a), Alpha particle emission and the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics,
*Physics Letters*43A, 29–30.Google Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1973b), The problem of measurement – real or imaginary?
*American Journal of Physics*41, 1022–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1976), Towards a micro realistic version of quantum mechanics, Parts I and II,
*Foundations of Physics*6, 275–292 and 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1982), Instead of particles and fields,
*Foundations of Physics*12, 607–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1985), Are probabilism and special relativity incompatible?
*Philosophy of Science,*52, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1988), Quantum propensiton theory: A testable resolution of the wave/particle dilemma,
*British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*39, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1993a), Induction and scientific realism: Einstein, aim-oriented empiricism and the discovery of special and general relativity,
*The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science*44, 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1993b), Beyond Fapp: Three approaches to improving orthodox quantum theory and an experimental test, In A. van der Merwe, Selleri, F., and Tarozzi, G. (ed.),
*Bell’s Theorem and the Foundations of Modern Physics*, Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 362–70.Google Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1994), Particle creation as the quantum condition for probabilistic events to occur
*, Physics Letters A*187, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1995), A philosopher struggles to understand quantum theory: Particle creation and wavepacket reduction, In M. Ferrero and van der Merwe, A. (ed.),
*Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics*, London: Kluwer Academic, pp. 205–214.Google Scholar - Maxwell, N. (1998),
*The Comprehensibility of the Universe: A New Conception of Science*, Oxford: Oxford University Press, (paperback 2003).Google Scholar - Maxwell, N. (2004), Does probabilism solve the great quantum mystery?
*Theoria*19/3(*51*), 321–336.Google Scholar - Maxwell, N. (2006), Special relativity, time, probabilism and ultimate reality, In D. Dieks (ed.),
*The Ontology of Spacetime*, Amsterdam: Elsevier, B.V., pp. 229–245.Google Scholar - Maxwell, N. 2011, Popper’s paradoxical pursuit of natural philosophy, In J. Shearmur, and G. Stokes (eds.),
*Cambridge Companion to Popper*, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Pais, A. (1982),
*Subtle is the Lord…*, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Pais, A. (1986),
*Inward Bound*, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Penrose, R. (1986), Gravity and state reduction, In R. Penrose and Isham, C. J.(eds.),
*Quantum Concepts of Space and Time*, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–146.Google Scholar - R. Penrose (2004),
*The Road to Reality*, London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar - Popper, K. (1957), The propensity interpretation of the calculus of probability and the quantum theory, In S. Körner (ed.),
*Observation and Interpretation*, London: Butterworth, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar - Popper, K. (1959),
*The Logic of Scientific Discovery*. London: Hutchinson (first published in 1934).Google Scholar - Popper, K. (1967), Quantum Mechanics without “The Observer”, In M. Bunge (ed.),
*Quantum Theory and Reality*, Berlin: Springer, pp. 7–44.Google Scholar - Popper, K. (1982),
*Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics*, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar - Wallace, D. (2008), The philosophy of quantum theory, In D. Rickles (ed.),
*Ashgate Companion to the New Philosophy of Physics*, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar