Skip to main content

Assessment of Flow Control Devices for Transonic Cavity Flows Using DES and LES

  • Conference paper
IUTAM Symposium on Unsteady Separated Flows and their Control

Part of the book series: IUTAM Bookseries ((IUTAMBOOK,volume 14))

Abstract

Since the implementation of internal carriage of stores on military aircraft, transonic flows in cavities were put forward as a model problem for validation of CFD methods before design studies of weapon bays can be undertaken. Depending on the free-stream Mach number and the cavity dimensions, the flow inside the cavity can become very unsteady. Below a critical length-to-depth ratio (L/D), the flow has enough energy to span across the cavity opening and a shear layer develops. When the shear layer impacts the downstream cavity corner, acoustical disturbances are generated and propagated upstream, which in turn causes further instabilities at the cavity front and a feedback loop is maintained. The acoustic environment in the cavity is so harsh in these circumstances that the noise level at the cavity rear has been found to approach 170 dB and frequencies near 1 kHz are created. The effect of this unsteady environment on the structural integrity of the contents of the cavity (e.g. stores, avionics, etc.) can be serious. Above the critical L/D ratio, the shear layer no longer has enough energy to span across the cavity and dips into it. Although this does not produce as high noise levels and frequencies as shorter cavities, the differential pressure along the cavity produces large pitching moments making store release difficult. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of cavity flows, based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier—Stokes equations was only able to capture some of the flow physics present. On the other hand, results obtained with Large-Eddy Simulation or Detached-Eddy Simulation methods fared much better and for the cases computed, quantitative and qualitative agreement with experimental data has been obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J.A. Ross and J.W. Peto. Internal Stores Carriage Research at RAE. Technical Report 2233, Royal Aircraft Establishment, January 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.A. Ross. Cavity Acoustic Measurements at High Speeds. Technical Report DERA/MSS/ MSFC2/TR000173, QinetiQ, March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.B. Tracy, E.B. Plentovich and J. Chu. Measurements of Fluctuating Pressure in a Rectangular Cavity in Transonic Flow at High Reynolds Numbers. Technical Report 4363, NASA, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.A. Ross and J.W. Peto. The Effect of Cavity Shaping, Front Spoilers and Ceiling Bleed on Loads Acting on Stores, and on the Unsteady Environment Within Weapon Bays. Technical report, QinetiQ, March 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Heller and J. Delfs. Cavity Pressure Oscillations: The Generating Mechanism Visualized. AIAA, 33(8):1404–1411, August 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.A. Kegerise, E.F Spina and L.N. Cattafesta. An Experimental Investigation of Flow-Induced Cavity Oscillations. In 30th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. AIAA, June/July 1999. AIAA Paper 99–3705.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S.A. Ritchie, N.J. Lawson and K. Knowles. An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of an Open Transonic Cavity. In 21st Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida, June 23–26 2003. AIAA Paper 2003–4221.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.J. Esteve, P. Reulet and P. Millan. Flow Field Characterisation within a Rectangular Cavity. In 10th International Symposium Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, July 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. Baysal and S. Srinivasan. Navier—Stokes Calculations of Transonic Flows Past Cavities. Technical report, NASA, 1989. Contractor Report 4210.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.D. Orkwis and P.J. Disimile. Transient Shear Layer Dynamics of Two- and Three-Dimensional Open Cavities. Technical Report ADA 298030, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.-J. Tam, P.D. Orkwis and P.J. Disimile. Algebraic Turbulence Model Simulations of Supersonic Open-Cavity Flow Physics. AIAA, 34(11):2255–2260, November 1996.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D.P. Rizzetta. Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Flow Over a Three-Dimensional Cavity. AIAA, 26(7):799–807, July 1988.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S.H. Shih, A. Hamed and J.J. Yeuan. Unsteady Supersonic Cavity Flow Simulations Using Coupled k—ε and Navier—Stokes Equations. AIAA, 32(10):2015–2021, October 1994.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. X. Zhang. Compressible Cavity Flow Oscillation due to Shear Layer Instabilities and Pressure Feedback. AIAA, 33(8):1404–1411, August 1995.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Lawrie. Investigation of Cavity Flows at Low and High Reynolds Numbers Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.E. Rossiter. Wind Tunnel Experiments on the Flow over Rectangular Cavities at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds. Technical Report 64037, Royal Aircraft Establishment, October 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L.N. Cattafesta, D. Williams, C. Rowley and F Alvi. Review of Active Control of Flow-Induced Cavity Resonance. In 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. AIAA, June 2003. AIAA Paper 2003–3567.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.J. de C. Henshaw. M219 Cavity Case. Technical Report RTO-TR-26, Research and Technology Organization, October 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Nayyar and G. Barakos. A Summary of Turbulence Modelling Approaches in CFD. Technical report, University of Glasgow, 2002. Aerospace Engineering Report 0206.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Nayyar, G Barakos and K. Badcock. Numerical Simulation of Transonic Cavity Flows using LES andDES. The Aeronautical Journal, 111(1117):153–164, March 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements The financial support of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council through grant EP/C533380/1 is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to extend their gratitude to John Ross and Graham Foster of QinetiQ (Bedford) and Trevor Birch of DSTL for providing the experimental data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barakos, G.N., Lawson, S.J., Steijl, R., Nayyar, P. (2009). Assessment of Flow Control Devices for Transonic Cavity Flows Using DES and LES. In: Braza, M., Hourigan, K. (eds) IUTAM Symposium on Unsteady Separated Flows and their Control. IUTAM Bookseries, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9898-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics