Southern Africa: Evolving Regional Water Law and Politics

  • Pieter van der Zaag

This chapter considers the governance of transboundary water resources in southern Africa. The emerging regional water law as well as trends in water sector reforms are described, illustrating the interplay of persisting customary practices, the inherited colonial law, and post-colonial legal reforms. The establishment of the Southern African Development Community is a landmark development that created an enabling environment for transboundary water cooperation to flourish. The development of regional water law in the Community's Protocol on Shared Watercourses is described in some detail. Experiments with basin-wide and catchment-specific institutional innovations are assessed, whereby national water sector reforms are linked to the establishment of river basin organizations. The chapter ends with a discussion on key aspects of transboundary river basin management, namely the interplay between institutions and hydraulic infrastructure, stakeholder involvement, environmental flows, interbasin transfers, and the monitoring of agreements.

Keywords

Conflict cooperationnvironmental flows interbasin transfers river basin organization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashton, P. (2000). Southern African water conflicts: Are they inevitable or preventable?. In Green Cross International, Water for peace in the Middle East and Southern Africa (pp. 86–106). Geneva: Green Cross International.Google Scholar
  2. Böge, V. (2006). Water governance in Southern Africa—cooperation and conflict prevention in transboundary river basins. Bonn: Bonn International Center for Conversion (Brief 33).Google Scholar
  3. Carmo Vaz, Á., & Lopes Pereira, A. (2000). The Incomati and Limpopo international river basins: A view from downstream. Water Policy, 2, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmo Vaz, Á., & van der Zaag, P. (2003). Sharing the Incomati waters: Cooperation and competition in the balance. IHP Technical Documents in Hydrology— PCCP series No. 14. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  5. Cleaver, F., & Franks, T. (2005). How institutions elude design: River basin management and sustainable livelihoods. Bradford, UK: University of Bradford.Google Scholar
  6. Coward, W. E., Jr. (1986). Direct or indirect alternatives for irrigation investment and the creation of property. In K. W. Easter (Ed.), Irrigation investment, technology and management strategies for development (pp. 225–244). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cory, H. (1953). Sukuma law and custom. London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cory, H., & Hartnoll, M. M. (1945). Customary law of the Haya tribe, Tanganyika territory. London, UK: International African Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Eberhardt, R. (2003). Review of national water policies; synthesis report, final: 30 June 2003. SADC water sector regional strategic action plan projects 9 and 10. Gaborone, Botswana: Southern African Development Community.Google Scholar
  10. Food and Agriculture Organisation (2008). FAOLEX. Available at http://faolex.fao.org/faolex/.
  11. Gumbo, B., & van der Zaag, P. (2002). Water losses and the political constraints to demand management: The case of the city of Mutare, Zimbabwe. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27, 805–813.Google Scholar
  12. Gupta, J., & van der Zaag, P. (2008). Interbasin water transfers and integrated water resources management: Where engineering, science and politics interlock. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, 28–40.Google Scholar
  13. Heyns, P. (2003). Water-resources management in Southern Africa. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), International waters in Southern Africa (pp. 5–37). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  14. International Law Association (1966). Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers. Approved at the 52nd conference, Helsinki, 20th August 1966.Google Scholar
  15. Magaia, E. M., & van der Zaag, P. (2006). Remote Sensing and GIS for Reservoir Water Assessment in the Incomati Basin. Paper presented at the 7th WaterNet/WARFSA/GWP-SA Symposium on Mainstreaming IWRM in the Development Process, Lilongwe, Malawi, 1–3 November.Google Scholar
  16. Manzungu, E. (2002). More than a headcount: Towards stakeholder representation in catchment management in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27, 927–933.Google Scholar
  17. Manzungu, E. (2004). Water for all: Improving water resource governance in Southern Africa. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development (Gatekeeper Series no. 113).Google Scholar
  18. McIlwaine, K. C. (1936). Notes on the water law of Southern Rhodesia. Rhodesia Agricultural Journal, 33, 788–801.Google Scholar
  19. Nakayama, M. (1999). The politics behind the Zambezi Action Plan. Water Policy, 1, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ohlsson, L. (1995). Water and security in southern Africa. Stockholm: Department of Natural Resources and the Environment (Publications on water resources no. 1).Google Scholar
  21. Pallett, J. (Ed.). (1997). Sharing water in southern Africa. Windhoek: Desert Research Foundation of Namibia.Google Scholar
  22. Ramazzotti, M. (1996). FA O legislative study no. 58: Readings in African customary water law. Rome, IT: Food and Agriculture Organisation.Google Scholar
  23. Salman, S. M. A. (2004). Shared watercourses in the southern African development community: Challenges and opportunities. Water Policy, 6, 5–38.Google Scholar
  24. Savenije, H. H. G., & Van der Zaag, P. (2000). Conceptual framework for the management of shared river basins with special reference to the SADC and EU. Water Policy, 2, 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schapera, I. (1943). Native land tenure in the Bechuanaland protectorate. Capetown: The Lovedale Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sokile, C. S., & van Koppen, B. (2004). Local water rights and local water user entities: The unsung heroines of water resource management in Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 1349–1356.Google Scholar
  27. Southern African Development Community (2008). History of SADC. Available at http://www.sadc.int/english/about/history/index.php.
  28. Swatuk, L. A. (2002). The new water architecture in southern Africa: Reflections on current trends in the light of Rio +10. International Affairs, 78, 507–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swatuk, L. A. (2005). Political challenges to sustainable river basin governance in southern Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30, 872–880.Google Scholar
  30. Swatuk, L. A., & Vale, P. (1999). Why democracy is not enough: Southern Africa and human security in the twenty-first century. Alternatives, 24, 361–389.Google Scholar
  31. Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (2008) [Oregon State University]. Available at http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu.
  32. United Nations (1997). Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. UN Doc. No. A/51/869.Google Scholar
  33. Van der Zaag, P. (1999). Water allocation principles in catchment areas: Some notes on constraints and opportunities. In E. Manzungu, A. Senzanje, & P. van der Zaag (Eds.), Water for agriculture in Zimbabwe: Policy and management options for the smallholder sector (pp. 168–178). Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Van der Zaag, P. (2005a). Integrated water resources management: Relevant concept of irrelevant buzzword? A capacity building and research agenda for Southern Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30, 867–871.Google Scholar
  35. Van der Zaag, P. (2005b). Water's vulnerable value in Africa. In International Hydrological Programme-Hydrology and Water Resources Programme, The value of water—different approaches in transboundary water management: Proceedings of the international workshop, Koblenz, 10–11 March 2005 (pp. 19–29). Kobenz: IHP-HWRP Sekretariat.Google Scholar
  36. Van der Zaag, P. (2007). Asymmetry and equity in water resources management: Critical governance issues for southern Africa. Water Resources Management, 21, 1993–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Zaag, P., & Carmo Vaz, Á. (2003). Sharing the Incomati waters: Cooperation and competition in the balance. Water Policy, 5, 349–368.Google Scholar
  38. Waalewijn, P., Wester, P., & Van Straaten, K. (2005). Transforming river basin management in South Africa: Lessons from the lower Komati river. Water International, 30, 184–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5, 29–60.Google Scholar

Cases

  1. International Court of Justice (1999). Kasikidi/Sedudu Island Case (Botswana v. Namibia), ICJ Reports 1999:1045–1109.Google Scholar

Other Government Materials

  1. National Water Act (1998) (South Africa).Google Scholar
  2. Southern African Development Community (1995). Protocol on Shared Watercourse Systems in the Southern African Development Community Region.Google Scholar
  3. Southern African Development Community (2000). Protocol on Shared Watercourses in the Southern African Development Community.Google Scholar
  4. Tripartite Interim Agreement (2002). Tripartite Interim Agreement between Mozambique, South Africa and Swaziland for Co-Operation on the Protection and Sustainable Utilisation of the Water Resources of the Incomati and Maputo Watercourses.Google Scholar
  5. Water Act (1998) (Zimbabwe).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter van der Zaag
    • 1
  1. 1.UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water EducationDelft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations