Smart Wireless Image Sensors for Video Surveillance

  • Massimo Conti
  • Simone Orcioni
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 38)


This chapter presents an analysis of image processing performance analysis of wireless image sensors networks for video surveillance. The dependence of image quality, network throughput and channel noise sensitivity with image enhancement algorithms, image compression and wireless protocols have been investigated. The objective of the work is to give useful guidelines in the design of image wireless networks over low cost, low power, low rate Bluetooth and Zigbee wireless protocols.


Image processing Video surveillance Wireless network Bluetooth Zigbee 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L.-W. Lai, C.-H. Lai, Y.-C. King, “A Novel Logarithmic Response CMOS Image Sensor with High Output Voltage Swing and In-Pixel Fixed-Pattern Noise Reduction”, IEEE Sensors Journal, 4(1), 122–126, Feb. 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, E. Capirci, “Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey”, Computer Networks 38, 393–422, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.-Y. Chong; S.P. Kumar, “Sensor networks: evolution, opportunities, and challenges”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(8), Aug. 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.P. Chandrakasan, R. Min, M. Bhardwaj, S.H. Cho, A. Wang, Power Aware Wireless Microsensor Systems, keynote Paper ESSCIRC, Florence, Italy, September 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Sohrabi, J. Gao, V. Ailawadhi, G.J. Pottie, Protocols for Self-Organization of a Wireless Sensor Network, IEEE Personal Communications, Vol. 7, No. 5, Oct. 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Ye, J. Heidemann, D. Estrin, An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks, In Proceedings of the 21st International Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2002), New York, NY, USA, June, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Hampapur, J. Brown, A. Connell, N. Ekin, M. Haas, H. Lu, S. Merkl, S. Pankanti, “Smart Video Surveillance: Exploring the Concept of Multiscale Spatiotemporal Tracking,” IEEE Signal Processing Mag., 22(2), 38–51, Mar. 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.L. Foresti, C. Micheloni, L. Snidaro, P. Remagnino, T. Ellis, “Active Video-Based Surveillance System: The Low-Level Image and Video Processing Techniques Needed for Implementation,” IEEE Signal Processing Mag., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 25–37, Mar. 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Kleihorst, A. Abbo, V. Choudhary, B. Schueler, “Design Challenges for Power Consumption in Mobile Smart Cameras,” in Proc. COGnitive Systems with Interactive Sensors (COGIS 2006), Mar. 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Rahimi, R. Baer, O.I. Iroezi, J.C. Garcia, J. Warrior, D. Estrin, M. Srivastava, “Cyclops: In Situ Image Sensing and Interpretation in Wireless Sensor Networks,” in Proc. 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2005), Nov. 2005, pp. 192–204.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Dias Real de Oliveira, P. Chalimbaud, F. Berry, J. Serot, F. Marmoiton, "Embedded Early Vision Systems: Implementation Proposal and Hardware Architecture," in Proc. COGnitive systems with Interactive Sensors (COGIS 2006), Mar. 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Downes, L. Baghaei Rad, H. Aghajan, “Development of a Mote for Wireless Image Sensor Networks,” in Proc. COGnitive Systems with Interactive Sensors (COGIS 2006), Mar. 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z.-Y. Cao, Z.-Z. Ji, M.-Z. Hu, “An Image Sensor Node for Wireless Sensor Networks,” in Proc. International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC 2005), 2, 740–745, Apr. 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Kleihorst, B. Schueler, A. Danilin, M. Heijligers, “Smart Camera Mote with High Performance Vision System,” ACM SenSys 2006 Workshop on Distributed Smart Cameras (DSC 2006), Oct. 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Bramberger, A. Doblander, A. Maier, B. Rinner, H. Schwabach, “Distributed Embedded Smart Cameras for Surveillance Applications,” in IEEE Computer Mag., 39(2), 68–75, Feb. 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Hengstler and H. Aghajan, “WiSNAP: A Wireless Image Sensor Network Application Platform”, 2nd Int. Conf. on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities (TridentCom), March 2006.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Hengstler, D. Prashanth, S. Fong, H. Aghajan, “MeshEye: A Hybrid-Resolution Smart Camera Mote for Applications in Distributed Intelligent Surveillance”, Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN-SPOTS), April 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Brown, J. Connell, A. Hampapur, M. Lu, A. Senior, C.-F. Shu, Y. Tian, “IBM Smart Surveillance System (S3): A Open And Extensible Framework For Event BasedSurveillance”, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Advanced Video- and Signal-based Surveillance September 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E.H. Land, “Recent Advances in Retinex Theory”, Vision Research, 26(1), 7–21, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Balercia, A. Zitti, H. Francesconi, S. Orcioni, M. Conti, “FPGA implementations of a simplified Retinex image processing algorithm”, Proc. of IEEE ICECS ’06 Int. Conf. on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, Nice, France, pp.176–9, December 10–13 2006.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Pekhteryev, Z. Sahinoglu,P. Orlik, G. Bhatti, “Image transmission over IEEE 802.15.4 and ZigBee Networks”, Proc. of IEEE ISCAS 2005, Kobe, Japan. pp.3539– 3542.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bluetooth SIG, “Specification of the Bluetooth system version 1.1,” Feb 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    “ZigBee White Paper” and “ZigBee Specifications” in
  24. 24.
    IEEE 802.15.4TMStd.– 2003 – Wireless Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications for Low-Rate Personal Area Networks (WPANs).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    IEEE 802.15.4TM Std.–2006– Revision of IEEE 802.15.4TM Std. – 2003.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Caldari, M. Conti, P. Crippa, G. Marozzi, F. Di Gennaro, S. Orcioni, C. Turchetti, “SystemC Modeling of a Bluetooth Transceiver: Dynamic Management of Packet Type in a Noisy Channel” Proc of DATE 2003, Munchen, pp.214–219.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Conti, D. Moretti, “System Level Analysis of the Bluetooth Standard”, Proc of DATE 2005, München, 3, 118–123.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. Mignogna, M. Conti, M. D’Angelo, M. Baleani, A. Ferrari, “Transaction Level Modeling and Performance Analysis in SystemC of IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Standard” DSD’2008, Proc. of Euromicro Conf. on Digital System Design, 3–5 September, 2008, Parma, Italy.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T.Y. Chui, F. Thaler, W.G. Scanlon, “A Novel Channel Modeling Technique for Performance Analysis of Bluetooth Baseband Packets”, ICC 2002. IEEE International Conf. on Communications 2002, 1, 308–312, 28 April-2 May 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Conti
    • 1
  • Simone Orcioni
    • 1
  1. 1.DIBET, Università Politecnica delle MarcheItaly

Personalised recommendations