Advertisement

Applications of Positron Emission Tomography in Liver Imaging: An Overview

  • Amir H. Khandani
Chapter
  • 1.7k Downloads
Part of the Methods of Cancer Diagnosis, Therapy and Prognosis book series (HAYAT, volume 5)

While positron emission tomography (PET) has been used for several decades in the research setting, its clinical use has grown substantially in the past decade. This is a quantitative physiological imaging modality utilizing positron emitters such as Fluorine-18, Oxygen-15, Nitrogen-13 and Carbon-11. The fact that several of these nuclides are components of common biological molecules makes PET particularly suitable to visually capture different biologic pathways; however, the short physical half-life of Oxygen-15 (2 min), Nitrogen-13 (10 min), and Carbon-11 (20 min) limits their utilization to the centers with an on-site cyclotron. Fluorine-18 has a physical half-life of 110 min and can be synthesized in commercially operating cyclotrons and transported to remote PET facilities. The most commonly used radiotracer is 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG).

Tumor imaging with FDG is based on the principle of increased glucose metabolism of cancer cells. Like glucose, FDG is taken up by the cancer cells through facilitative glucose transporters (Glut). These transporters are glycoproteins, and so far, 12 isoforms have been identified in different organs. Normal hepatocytes express Glut2, Glut9, and Glut10 (Joost and Thorens, 2001). Expression of Gluts, predominantly Glut1 and Glut3, is significantly increased in most malignancies.

Keywords

Positron Emission Tomography Positron Emission Tomography Image Hepatic Metastasis Gallbladder Carcinoma Ultra Sound 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, C.D., Rice, M.H., Pinson, C.W., Chapman, W.C., Chari, R.S., and Delbeke, D. 2004. Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 8: 90–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delbeke, D., Martin, W.H., Sandler, M.P., Chapman, W.C., Wright, J.K. Jr., and Pinson, C.W. 1998. Evaluation of benign vs malignant hepatic lesions with positron emission tomography. Arch. Surg. 133: 510–515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ho, C.L., Yu, S.C., and Yeung, D.W. 2003. 11C-acetate PET imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma and other liver masses. J. Nucl. Med. 44: 213–221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hustinx, R., Paulus, P., Jacquet, N., Jerusalem, G., Bury, T., and Rigo, P. 1998. Clinical evaluation of whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of liver metastases. Ann. Oncol. 9: 397–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Joost, H.G., and Thorens, B. 2001. The extended GLUT-family of sugar/polyol transport facilitators: nomenclature, sequence characteristics, and potential function of its novel members. Mol. Membr. Biol. 18: 247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kato, T., Tsukamoto, E., Kuge, Y., Katoh, C., Nambu, T., Nobuta, A., Kondo, S., Asaka, M., and Tamaki, N. 2002. Clinical role of (18) F-FDG PET for initial staging of patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 29: 1047–1054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim, Y.J., Yun, M., Lee, W.J., Kim, K.S., and Lee, J.D. 2003. Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 30: 1467–1472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim, Y.W., Park, Y.K., Yoon, T.Y., and Lee, S.M. 2002. Expression of the GLUT1 glucose transporter in gallbladder carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 49: 907–911.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kinkel, K., Lu, Y., Both, M., Warren, R.S., and Thoeni, R.F. 2002. Detection of hepatic metas-tases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 224: 748–756.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koh, T., Taniguchi, H., Yamaguchi, A., Kunishima, S., and Yamagishi, H. 2003. Differential diagnosis of gallbladder cancer using positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-labeled fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET). J. Surg. Oncol. 84: 74–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, J.D., Yun, M., Lee, J.M., Choi, Y., Choi, Y.H., Kim, J.S., Kim, S.J., Kim, K.S., Yang, W.I., Park, Y.N., Han, K.H., Lee, W.J., Yoo, N., Lim, S.M., and Park, J.H. 2004. Analysis of gene expression profiles of hepatocellular carcinomas with regard to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake pattern on positron emission tomography. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 3: 1621–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marom, E.M., McAdams, H.P., Erasmus, J.J., Goodman, P.C., Culhane, D.K., Coleman, R.E., Herndon, J.E., and Patz, E.F. Jr. 1999. Staging non-small cell lung cancer with whole-body PET. Radiology 212: 803–809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Roh, M.S., Jeong, J.S., Kim, Y.H., Kim, M.C., and Hong, S.H. 2004. Diagnostic utility of GLUT1 in the differential diagnosis of liver carcinomas. Hepatogastroenterology 5: 1315–1318.Google Scholar
  14. Rydberg, J., Khandani, A.H., Ivanovic, M., and McCartney, W.H. 2005. Comparison of Liver, Mediastinum, and Muscle as References for Background Activity in 18-F FDG PET-CT Imaging. RSNA Annual Meeting: Abstract # LPL 15-04-P.Google Scholar
  15. Torizuka, T., Tamaki, N., Inokuma, T., Magata, Y., Sasayama, S., Yonekura, Y., Tanaka, A., Yamaoka, Y., Yamamoto, K., and Konishi, J. 1995. In vivo assessment of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma with FDG-PET. J. Nucl. Med. 36: 1811–1817.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Trojan, J., Schroeder, O., Raedle, J., Baum, R.P., Herrmann, G., Jacobi, V., and Zeuzem, S. 1999. Fluorine-18 FDG positron emission tomography for imaging of Hepatocellular carcinoma. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 94: 3314–3319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsuda, M., Rikimaru, H., Majima, K., Yamada, T., Saito, H., Ishibashi, T., Takahashi, S., Miyachi, H., Endoh, M., and Yamada, S. 2003. Time-related changes of radiofrequency ablation lesion in the normal rabbit liver: findings of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology. Invest. Radiol. 38: 525–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yang, M., Martin, D.R., Karabulut, N., and Frick, M.P. 2003. Comparison of MR and PET imaging for the evaluation of liver metastases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17: 343–349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zimmerman, R.L., Burke, M., Young, N.A., Solomides, C.C., and Bibbo, M. 2002a. Diagnostic utility of Glut-1 and CA 15-3 in discriminating adenocarcinoma from hepatocel-lular carcinoma in liver tumors biopsied by fine-needle aspiration. Cancer 96: 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zimmerman, R.L., Fogt, F., Burke, M., and Murakata, L.A. 2002b. Assessment of Glut1 expression in cholangiocarcinoma, benign biliary lesions and hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 9: 689–692.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir H. Khandani
    • 1
  1. 1.Director, Nuclear Medicine Residency and Fellowship Director, PET Services Department of RadiologyUNC School of MedicineChapel Hill

Personalised recommendations