Sartre’s Phenomenology of History: Community, Agency and Comprehension

  • William D. Melaney
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 99)


The paper argues that Sartre’s work as both a literary critic and social philosopher is deeply indebted to his early commitment to phenomenology. The first part of the paper examines the nature of reading and writing in the account of literary meaning that is presented in the transitional text, Qu’est-ce que la littérature? While acknowledging the political turn that occurs in Sartre’s work, we then discuss how the theme of history emerges in the later essay, Questions de méthode, as one that opens up a “double reading” of human motivation. Our conclusion maintains that the Marxist phase of Sartre’s work is based on the hermeneutical notion of comprehension, which provides an anthropological grounding for his existential philosophy.


Literary Work Double Reading Aesthetic Response Marxist Tradition Pure Phenomenology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnes, Hazel E. Sartre and Flaubert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. Frank, Manfred. “Archäologie des Individuums. Zur Hermeneutik von Sartres Flaubert.” Das Sagbare und das Unsagbare. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1993. pp. 256–333.Google Scholar
  3. Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art.” Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Albert Hofstadler. New York: HarperCollins, 2001. pp. 15–86.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, Edmund. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Trans. F. Kersten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982.Google Scholar
  5. Husserl, Edmund. The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Trans. David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. London and Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. Jameson, Fredric. “Sartre and History.” Marxism and Form. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971. pp. 206–305.Google Scholar
  8. Kaelin, Eugene F. An Existentialist Aesthetic: The Theories of Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1962.Google Scholar
  9. LaCapra, Dominick. A Preface to Sartre. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. Ricoeur, Paul. Lectures on Ideology and Utopia. Ed. George H. Taylor. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  12. Sartre, Jean-Paul. “Kierkegaard: The Singular Universal” and “A Plea for Intellectuals.” Between Existentialism and Marxism. Trans. John Mathews. New York: Pantheon Books, 1974. pp. 141–69, 228–85.Google Scholar
  13. Sartre, Jean-Paul. The Family Idiot, I: Gustave Flaubert 1821–1857. Trans. Carol Cosman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. Sartre, Jean-Paul. Search for a Method. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967.Google Scholar
  15. Sartre, Jean-Paul. What is Literature? Trans. Bernard Frechtman. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • William D. Melaney

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations